• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: The sinking of MS Estonia: Case Reopened Part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mojo said:
Remember, in Vixen's universe she had "a bird's eye view" of 10 Downing Street's back yard from Old Queen Street, and "it was a very good view".
Click to expand...

Ah yes. That was, er, 'fun' ?
 
Vixen said:
Even if the MV Estonia was pierced on its side by a rocky outcrop - despite landing face down - why didn't the JAIC mention it?
Click to expand...

How does a ship land "face down"?

They land rightside-up, upside down, on their starboard, or port side.

This is the latest animation showing the damage:

https://vimeo.com/866624581?share=copy

The fact you ignored this recent post suggests other motives to continue this thread, because the facts are not with you. There is no damage below the waterline of MS Estonia, meaning no collision, and no explosion.

You have wasted your time.
 
Vixen said:
It was not GPS.

She-eesh.

The point is, someone tampered with them to ensure the ship would sink before rescue arrived. And it did.
Click to expand...
So it wasn't a Swedish sub accidentally colliding with the ferry? Great. We'll cross that off the list and never have to discuss it again.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
phiwum said:
So it wasn't a Swedish sub accidentally colliding with the ferry? Great. We'll cross that off the list and never have to discuss it again.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


No possibility hypothosis theory idea bat **** crazy conspiracy theory is off the table. Except the explanation put forward by actual experts who investigated the disaster.
 
P.J. Denyer said:
No possibility hypothosis theory idea bat **** crazy conspiracy theory is off the table. Except the explanation put forward by actual experts who investigated the disaster.
Click to expand...


Yeah, when your intellectual goal is “anything but what everyone else thinks is right,” you get to run off in a zillion incompatible directions at once.
 
JayUtah said:
Yeah, when your intellectual goal is “anything but what everyone else thinks is right,” you get to run off in a zillion incompatible directions at once.
Click to expand...

It must be hard to live in a world where literally every single other person is wrong on every subject. Even reality refuses to accept that they're right!
 
JayUtah said:
Yeah, when your intellectual goal is “anything but what everyone else thinks is right,” you get to run off in a zillion incompatible directions at once.
Click to expand...

You only have to look at "alternative medicine" where the crystal healers, homeopaths, reiki, acupunturists, faith healers, chiropractors etc all support each other despite having completely contradictory models of what causes disease.
 
Jack by the hedge said:
Of course it isn't. You weren't there. We have accounts from people who were there, claiming there were definitely zero, one, two, three and four military trucks on board.
Click to expand...

The common consensus is that there were two.

As you know, see a few posts back, the SHK told Sara Hedrenius, survivor, that they were not interested in that aspect.

Given that the cargo likely holds the key to the entire 'accident' that is rather a glaring omission.
 
JayUtah said:
Literally because there was no way for anyone to have seen it at the time. Learn how eyeballs work.
Click to expand...

Especially as 'the rocky outcrop' is likely to be the gravel and macadam that was tossed onto the stricken vessel in order to bury it in concrete. If the 'rocky outcrop' came after the sinking then it cannot be the cause of it. In any case, if the ship missed it, it cannot be the cause of it either.
 
Axxman300 said:
How does a ship land "face down"?

They land rightside-up, upside down, on their starboard, or port side.

This is the latest animation showing the damage:

https://vimeo.com/866624581?share=copy

The fact you ignored this recent post suggests other motives to continue this thread, because the facts are not with you. There is no damage below the waterline of MS Estonia, meaning no collision, and no explosion.

You have wasted your time.
Click to expand...

Who is responsible for the VIMEO graphics? Anyone can do a computer simulation of anything they wish.

There is a vertical tear as well as a horizontal one.

breach by Username Vixen, on Flickr
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom