Cont: The Biden Presidency (3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The US Presidency is a beauty contest, and has always been. There is no tradition to prepare a successor, the assumption being that most Presidents get a second term, at which point the Party holding the White House will change.

I wish that the same people who say Biden is to old and should set away from power would use the same level of energy to tell McConnell, Feinstein, Pelosi, SCJ Thomas, Alito and everyone else above 70.
 
The US Presidency is a beauty contest, and has always been. There is no tradition to prepare a successor, the assumption being that most Presidents get a second term, at which point the Party holding the White House will change.

I wish that the same people who say Biden is to old and should set away from power would use the same level of energy to tell McConnell, Feinstein, Pelosi, SCJ Thomas, Alito and everyone else above 70.
 
The US Presidency is a beauty contest, and has always been. There is no tradition to prepare a successor, the assumption being that most Presidents get a second term, at which point the Party holding the White House will change.

I wish that the same people who say Biden is to old and should set away from power would use the same level of energy to tell McConnell, Feinstein, Pelosi, SCJ Thomas, Alito and everyone else above 70.
So that's trump out of the running too LOL

(he's 77, born in June, 1946)

Mind you- he's only a 'little' bit younger than Joe Biden (Nov,1942) and in considerably poorer physical health...
(no he isn't 6'3" and 215 pounds lol)
And mentally- well, yeah, his mental health has been in question for a long time....

(Biden's BMI is 24.1, while trump is (according to his self proclaimed figures) 30.4, but in reality- he's exaggerated his height, and reduced his weight (considerably) which likely means his BMI is far higher....)
 
Trump cannot win a general election against Biden.
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove reference to forum management issue


Anyway, 1 with at least the beginnings of a reason to actually believe it would be better... like this:

Republicans have won ONE popular vote for President in the last 35 years.
(I think you mean one who wasn't an incumbent, right?)

Unfortunately, that doesn't cut it.

For one thing, the rural party doesn't need the popular vote to win the Presidency over the urban party.

Second, 1 proves that it is possible, and the claim that started this was that it's impossible (and 1 out of the last 8 or 9 elections, or less than that if we're only counting non-incumbents, isn't even particularly tiny odds).

Third, a Biden popular-vote loss is what the surveys show us heading for, whether it would be the first time in whatever number of years or not. (They've wavered between a popular-vote loss and a toss-up, which averages out to a small loss... in an election where he needs to not just win but win by a certain minimum margin, not just any majority.)

And fourth, acting like it's already over and a Trump win is an absurd notion that could never really happen is an exact duplication of what many Democrats were doing when Trump actually won, except that the surveys now are slightly better for Trump than they were back then.

Bonus problem: the "the surveys can be wrong; just look at how wrong they were when Trump won" response is multiple types of failure combined; the surveys got it right that a Trump win was substantially likely, the pretense today that the surveys must be wrong in exactly the way we need is another exact duplication of the pretense back then that they were wrong in the exact way we need, to the small extent that any survey bias existed it was toward making things appear worse for Trump in the survey than they are in reality which is the opposite kind of survey bias from the one the argument would need, and if you do acknowledge the reality of the situation but your response is just to whine & scold people for not already having fallen in line then that's just how to make things worse for your own side not better.

Bonus bonus problem: one might want to counter the Trump/Biden surveys with the election results in recent special elections, which have swung in Democrats' favor by an average of 11 points compared to historical trends, but those are other Democrats versus other Republicans, not Biden versus Trump. So that comparison only means Biden should be up over Trump by about that much, which he isn't, so it only emphasizes that the Democrats are once again putting their weakest candidate up for the biggest position.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom