• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault

Manger Douse said:
The police actively sought you for a statement in a safe house for a crime they already believe had happened, rather than you reporting a sexual assault to them in a police station. Your situation seems so vastly different to an adverage rape case I really don't understand why you've attempted to defend the police by bringing it up at all
Click to expand...

Someone else who was in prison at the time made the complaint and recalled my name.
The police; when I guess they didn't have to as it happened years ago, did follow it up and contacted me. I corroborated the complaint and remembered lots of names and addresses so then the investigation continued.
I brought it up as they could have decided to not bother to pursue it, or dismissed what I was saying, etc. But they didn't.
I'm not defending the police, I was just saying that they must have changed a lot since 2001'ish.
 
Lothian said:
Clear cut? They ask if he gets money from producing content and whether they intend following youtube in stopping payments. They do not ask them to stop paying him. I think you are missing a clear cut instruction or threat which forces a breach of contract.
Click to expand...

Reactionaries are really into the idea that "tortious interference" is the perfect defense to the reputational harm caused by being a far right wing crank, but I'm not aware of this being successfully deployed as a means to prevent criticism like that leveled against Brand.

Pointing out that people like Brand are human dumpster fires and that reputable companies continuing to associate with them is brand suicide is not tortious interference.
 
Last edited:
p0lka said:
Someone else who was in prison at the time made the complaint and recalled my name.
The police; when I guess they didn't have to as it happened years ago, did follow it up and contacted me. I corroborated the complaint and remembered lots of names and addresses so then the investigation continued.
I brought it up as they could have decided to not bother to pursue it, or dismissed what I was saying, etc. But they didn't.
I'm not defending the police, I was just saying that they must have changed a lot since 2001'ish.
Click to expand...

Your situation seems so vastly different to an adverage rape case I really don't understand why you've attempted to defend the police by bringing it up at all
 
TurkeysGhost said:
Reactionaries are really into the idea that "tortious interference" is the perfect defense to the reputational harm caused by being a far right wing crank, but I'm not aware of this being successfully deployed as a means to prevent criticism like that leveled against Brand.

Pointing out that people like Brand are human dumpster fires and that reputable companies continuing to associate with them is brand suicide is not tortious interference.
Click to expand...
Ok, it did seem strange. I was confused how someone could know the term but be clueless on it's application.
 
Lothian said:
Clear cut? They ask if he gets money from producing content and whether they intend following youtube in stopping payments. They do not ask them to stop paying him. I think you are missing a clear cut instruction or threat which forces a breach of contract.
Click to expand...

The letters refer to "victims", presumably of Brand (who else's could she be talking about?), when there are only 'accusers' at present, by legal and literal definition.
 
IsThisTheLife said:
The letters refer to "victims", presumably of Brand (who else's could she be talking about?), when there are only 'accusers' at present, by legal and literal definition.
Click to expand...

Reading or at least understanding what you read doesn't appear to be your strong point.

The letter does not say what you think. Stop presuming and find a child to explain it to you.
 
I would expect, in a sane and healthy society with commensurate government 'of the people and for the people', that a substantial number of MP's would be demanding an enquiry into the Dame's conduct, or simply her resignation, but all we have now in our governments are careerist slime-balls, so that won't happen.
 
Y'all might want to look in to the 77th Brigade (of the British Army) and its role (hint; information warfare).

Funnily enough Dame Whatsherface's husband was its commander for several years from its formation in 2015.

Well I never.
 
IsThisTheLife said:
Y'all might want to look in to the 77th Brigade (of the British Army) and its role (hint; information warfare).

Funnily enough Dame Whatsherface's husband was its commander for several years from its formation in 2015.

Well I never.
Click to expand...

Did the deep state travel back in time and make Brand send those tweets about orgasms and 13+ year olds?
 
Manger Douse said:
Did the deep state travel back in time and make Brand send those tweets about orgasms and 13+ year olds?
Click to expand...

It looks to be the typically vulgar, if not downright disgusting "humour" Brand indulged in at that time as a priapic, drugged-up mess.

If you want to take it as a literal manifesto, well, you can't be very bright.
 
Last edited:
IsThisTheLife said:
It looks to be the typically vulgar, if not downright disgusting "humour" Brand indulged in at that time as a priapic, drugged-up mess.

If you want to take it as a literal manifesto, well, you can't be very bright.
Click to expand...

I don't take it as a manifesto but I'm glad we agree that Brand was a priapic, drugged-up mess around the time these sexual assault allegations stem from
 
I have to say, I'm somewhat in awe of the number of adult females Brand had rogered by c. 2012, I gather it's well into four figures. You go dude!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom