• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault

Yet you made the claim in this thread.

Yes I did. What I didn't do was claim it had any relevance. I also never argued that my claim was correct and your counter claim was wrong.

This seems awfully important to you. Where is this concern about my simple, utterly irrelevant aside being wrong coming from?
 
Have we reached the point that ruining the lives of unknowable numbers of innocent men is "a price worth paying" in setting a bar for evidence for sexual assault allegations by women lower than for literally any and all other crimes?
So much straw....
:rolleyes:
 
My question wasn't really rhetorical, or even a question, but a statement of fact.

If you ask a question that is actually a statement of (what you consider to be) fact, its a rhetorical question.

Have we reached a point where a misogynistic, unfunny, attention whore of an ******* must be given a platform, or must he be on our TV screens?

Were you outraged when he was fired from MTV for wearing an Osama Bin Laden costume on 9/12/01? HOW DARE THEY INFRINGE ON HIS 1A RIGHTS!
 
Last edited:
To be fair, he's hilarious every time he opens his mouth and says a little tiny thing in an enormous amout of words to obfuscate and sound clever.

But that's laughing at him and not with him, the annoying **** that he is.

Yeah that was what I originally thought to be his schtick, when actually its just his personality.
 
In my defence I'm not relying on my own perceptions of Brand for anything at all. This Brand affair and this thread is an interesting aside and no more. I'm enjoying reading the many posts claiming prescience on this sceptics site.

I don't know if he's guilty or not. My knee jerk reaction, if you put a gun to my head, would only go as far as, "there's plenty smoke here and you know what the old saying says". I prefer to wait and see if charges are brought. If not then I'm pointing the finger at a malicious MSM.

Have you read the Times article?
 
If you ask a question that is actually a statement of (what you consider to be) fact, its a rhetorical question.

Have we reached a point where a misogynistic, unfunny, attention whore of an ******* must be given a platform, or must he be on our TV screens?

Were you outraged when he was fired from MTV for wearing an Osama Bin Laden costume on 9/12/01? HOW DARE THEY INFRINGE ON HIS 1A RIGHTS!

Does this make him guilty a priori with you?
 
Yes, why do you ask?

Just wondering if you'd based your judgement on more than the posts in here, as it sounded like.

While I've got you here, you said, "I don't know if he's guilty or not. My knee jerk reaction, if you put a gun to my head, would only go as far as, "there's plenty smoke here and you know what the old saying says". I prefer to wait and see if charges are brought."

How does the saying go? I don't know what you mean.

And do we know if charges can be brought? What is the statute of limitations?
 
Just wondering if you'd based your judgement on more than the posts in here, as it sounded like.

While I've got you here, you said, "I don't know if he's guilty or not. My knee jerk reaction, if you put a gun to my head, would only go as far as, "there's plenty smoke here and you know what the old saying says". I prefer to wait and see if charges are brought."

How does the saying go? I don't know what you mean.

With a gun to my head remember. There is no smoke without fire.

We are all, at this point in time, reading reports of reports of allegations. These allegations are stacking up against Brand but we must bear in mind that no charges have been made

And do we know if charges can be brought? What is the statute of limitations?

Under the current law in England and Wales, there is no statute of limitations for rape and other serious sexual offences, meaning that charges can be brought at any time, regardless of how long ago the alleged offence took place.
 
Does this make him guilty a priori with you?

No, where have I said he should be criminally guilty and given a custodial sentence? The **** he's said and done is enough for me to be glad he's "cancelled". ETA: I dont mean the recent allegations I mean the stuff he's publicly said and done in the past.

How the ************ got work at all in the USA after his Osama Bin Laden "joke" is beyond me. I guess it just didn't really got well publicized?
 
Last edited:
No, where have I said he should be criminally guilty and given a custodial sentence? The **** he's said and done is enough for me to be glad he's "cancelled". ETA: I dont mean the recent allegations I mean the stuff he's publicly said and done in the past.

What's silly about all this, is that his promiscuity and behavior have been well known for a long time. But when he was in the lefty camp, it was all good. Now that he spouts opinions lefties don't like, he's going down.
 
What's silly about all this, is that his promiscuity and behavior have been well known for a long time. But when he was in the lefty camp, it was all good. Now that he spouts opinions lefties don't like, he's going down.

No, not really. There's a difference between being a slimeball and being a sex offender, even alleged.

Also a large number of people didn't like him even when he was a "lefty".
 
What's silly about all this, is that his promiscuity and behavior have been well known for a long time. But when he was in the lefty camp, it was all good. Now that he spouts opinions lefties don't like, he's going down.

This says more about conservatives than it does about lefties.
 

Back
Top Bottom