9/11: The Smoking Gun

Fonebone said:
--And--
this post outlines the missile path thru the WTC2 south wall and
the missile nose as it exits the North wall at the North-East bevel.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=7443177#post7443177
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814c9c36a3c2530.jpg[/qimg]


Note the nose shaped shadow cast horizontally on the partially sun-lit north wall as the missile nose exits.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814cf7347f0da62.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

You do know the entire attack is on video from multiple angles, right? And how does a sane person ignore the 767?

Why don't you explain to us heathens how a 767 loaded with jet fuel, flying over 400mph is different than a cruise missile.
 
Fonebone said:
...This is the missile suspect...
An AGM-86D cruise missile.
Click to expand...

With a Napalm FAE warhead, you said?

Steve d'Eak's theory is that the missiles (plural) flew in on a path almost parallel to the South face of the South tower, so each missile would hit, and break or bend, multiple columns.

Do you DISAGREE with that theory?

Because it doesn't seem to make much sense - when would any warhead explode in a scenario where one missle does the same damage to multiple columns?

Don't discuss this with me, by the way. Fight your differences with Steve out with Steve.
I am sure you can both see very clearly how the other is obviously wrong, lying, a part of controlled opposition.
 
Fonebone said:
--And--
this post outlines the missile path thru the WTC2 south wall and
the missile nose as it exits the North wall at the North-East bevel.
NOSE IN -
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=7443177#post7443177
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814c9c36a3c2530.jpg[/qimg]



NOSE OUT -

Note the nose shaped shadow cast horizontally on the partially sun-lit north wall as the missile nose exits.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814cf7347f0da62.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...


Can you explain why the "NOSE OUT" in that image, and its shadow, are two orders of magnitude larger than the nose of the AGM86D missile shown in the photo in your previous post?
 
Myriad said:
Can you explain why the "NOSE OUT" in that image, and its shadow, are two orders of magnitude larger than the nose of the AGM86D missile shown in the photo in your previous post?
Click to expand...

There are several explanations:

  1. The missile grew while it was inside the building.
  2. Actually more missiles were shot, including a huge cruise missile, but with a tiny warhead that did very little damage, but it had to be huge just because.
  3. The huge missile was actually shot from inside the building in that direction as the other one penetrated.
  4. There was no missile, it was a plane and that is not the nose. No, no, forget I said that, that's not possible.
 
Wow, I can't believe it's been a year.

(*Looks in forum*)

Wow, I can't believe someone's still trying to pitch cruise missiles. At least it's back to the Twin Towers instead of "cruise missile at the Pentagon", but still...
 
Oystein said:
With a Napalm FAE warhead, you said?
Click to expand...
Correction... I stated the AGM-86D was capable of carrying any
of multiple flavors of warheads, including incendiary payloads
such as Napalm and Napalm2. The evidence proves the incendiaries
deployed on both WTC missiles were Napalm2 warheads.


Steve d'Eak's theory is that the missiles (plural) flew in on a path almost parallel to the South face of the South tower, so each missile would hit, and break or bend, multiple columns.
Click to expand...
Steve De'ak's video clearly outlines his theories on the two cruise missiles
striking the two WTC towers.
https://911crashtest.org/what-cut-the-plane-shaped-hole-take-2/


Do you DISAGREE with that theory?
Click to expand...
My theories are delineated in this post
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=13974952#post13974952


Because it doesn't seem to make much sense - when would any warhead explode in a scenario where one missle does the same damage to multiple columns?
Click to expand...
Ask Steve...


Don't discuss this with me, by the way. Fight your differences with Steve out with Steve.
Click to expand...
Steve is MIA-... how about you and I discuss the evidence I post.

I am sure you can both see very clearly how the other is obviously wrong, lying, a part of controlled opposition.
Click to expand...

If Steve joins the thread he can participate. Meanwhile, I discuss with you and others.

Edited by jimbob: 
the quote tags had been messed up, I believe it was inadvertent, so have edited them
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Steve said:
Here I am. And I think your opinions on this topic are stark raving bonkers.
Click to expand...


Dick Oliver---WNYW reporter New York City

Live on the CNN television speaking with Jim Ryan on the morning of 9/11/2001. 9:03 EDT

Youtube keeps deleting the Clip but truth-seekers keep re-posting it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDT7RHDeX64
[excerpt]
Some people said that "they thought they saw a missile....." [/excerpt]
 
Last edited:
Fonebone said:
Dick Oliver---WNYW reporter New York City

Live on the CNN television speaking with Jim Ryan on the morning of 9/11/2001. 9:03 EDT

Youtube keeps deleting the Clip but truth-seekers keep re-posting it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDT7RHDeX64
[excerpt]
Some people said that "they thought they saw a missile....." [/excerpt]
Click to expand...

The fact that other some persons also have opinions that are stark raving bonkers does not change my position one jot.
 
Fonebone said:
Dick Oliver---WNYW reporter New York City

Live on the CNN television speaking with Jim Ryan on the morning of 9/11/2001. 9:03 EDT

Youtube keeps deleting the Clip but truth-seekers keep re-posting it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDT7RHDeX64
[excerpt]
Some people said that "they thought they saw a missile....." [/excerpt]
Click to expand...

Is that the selfsame Dick Oliver who was with a camera man and a rolling video cam next to City Hall which recorded the sound of an approaching PLANE and a single crash sound and they sait it sounded like a plane, and seconds later they filmed the plane-shaped hole? That Dick Oliver? Urr, yes. Indeed. That Dick Oliver.
 
Fonebone said:
--And--

This is the exit hole created in the North-East bevel wall by
the missile as it exited.

[qimg]https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j394/xfonebonex1/wtc2Noseexithole.jpg?width=960&height=720&fit=bounds[/qimg]">
Click to expand...

Let's see: An airplane shape heads toward the building and then a missile pokes its nose out??? When viewing the video, it looks like a bunch of compressed air being forced out of the building, not a plane nor a missile. And you have never commented on the plane entering the building was CGId onto the video with no hole or damage being visible. That is because the plane is in front of the hole/damage, moments later when the plane clears the face of the building, the damage appears shaped more or less like a plane, not a missile.
 
jaydeehess said:
No, just no. If the missile exploded inside the building then the "nosecone" did not exit . Besides I thought this missile was cloaked by a Klingon cloaking device.
Click to expand...

The Missle would have also have to have had the same Aluminum steel frame work and mass as the Planes wings, remember the wing tips do not Contain any Fuel so are Built lighter and have less Impacting mass than the interior of the wings.
Simple explanation is the wing tips being lighter built with much less mass collapsed and the interior structure was dragged along the outer wall, of perimeter Columns.
This is as much a Smoking Gun as the Flyash Microspheres used in the Flux Coating of welding rods used to weld the Columns together, or the LeClade paint used to paint the buildings it's another Nothing Burger a total misunderstanding of the physics of the Planes impact.
 
JSanderO said:
Heard a radio talking head claim the collapse was caused by crappy insulation associated with a Gotti family contractor.
Click to expand...


Does that "radio talking-head" have a name? That statement is a blatent antisamnitic slur and
this "talking-head should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. You
practice your craft in New York City i believe. Name the radio station's call letters as well.
You should be ashamed to post this garbage statement to
a public forum with no evidence to back the "talking dimwit's" asinine tripe.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom