MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
Absolute nonsense in respect of a winchman working in a four-man iirc team of many and arriving some three hours late (according to the JAIC) to a standard civilian rescue effort, of which dozens of rescuers were already there, is NOT equivalent to the Gold Medal with Sword in combat or war-like situations. It was Sweden's highest military honour, equivalent to the Victoria Cross. My close relatives received Liberty Crosses with Swords AND Oak Leaves and they actually were on the front line face-to-face with the enemy over a period of time.
It is quite clear the the Estonia incident was not perceived as a civilian accident by the Swedish Military. What Ensign Ken Svensson really did heroically is classified information, as one would expect in conditions deemed a war. In this case the dying embers of the USSR. It is in plain sight. Whilst the early newspaper reports are censored and the JAIC do not mention it, make no mistake that medal was awarded for a genuine military reason.
In addition, whilst the Swedish rescuers were delayed arriving due to poor communications, their pilots also were unable to land their helicopters in the ships' decks because they didn't have the skills that Finns had, who were able to land. This will be due to the type of training beforehand and not a reflection on their abilities or heroism.
Whether or not you agree with the description of the Estonia incident as being sufficiently "war like" to merit the award of the medal is immaterial. You claimed it was a medal ONLY awarded for actions in combat. You were wrong. Do you admit that?