9/11: The Smoking Gun

Fonebone said:
Correct-

The contents of the link pithed* me off and made me angry !

Samuel Johnson's Dictionary


*pith- 4. Energy; cogency; fulness of sentiment; closeness and vigour of thought and stile.

https://www.definitions.net/definition/PITH
Click to expand...

So...Actual engineering discussions using physical evidence, applied physics, and quality research offends you?

Why should anyone take you seriously on any level?

I ask based on the body of your posts on this forum which lack any basis in reality, and demonstrate a vast lack of fundamental knowledge of the most basic, and easily researchable facts of how things work.

I readily admit most the majority of the two NIST reports are over my head, intellectually, and educationally. But I can read the "Conclusion" chapters just fine, and it is there the "Truth" jumps off the page. I have no problem letting smarter people figure things out, and I'm certainly not so stupid as to question their findings based on two years of college with a major in Marine Geology.

Choosing ignorance is nothing to be proud of.
 
After years away from here, I popped in on a nostalgic whim. Some things really never change...wow.

Steve, get a new hobby, mate.

"True believers can't get past the television show"

Proceeds to bang on about a movie.

Exquisite, Sir...thanks for the laugh and maybe you shouldn't watch too many movies, it's bad for you 😉
 
School of Hard Knocks presents fantasy from steve

yankee451 said:
Dropping by to check out the comments. As usual, the true believers can't get past the television show. So, for those of you who are critical thinking-challenged:

Have you ever seen the movie of the bank heist where the criminals put a photo of the bank vault in front of the security camera to dupe the guards into thinking the vault is okay, while it’s being robbed? The wily criminals simply hide their vault-cracking activities behind a photograph of a pristine vault. It works every time (at least in Hollywood). Shows like Hudson Hawk, Speed, and Mission Impossible, old and new, have used this camera-spoofing technique.
https://911crashtest.org/pulling-the-wool-over-the-eyes-of-the-world/
Click to expand...

The old School of Hard Knocks left out physics.

The evidence free missile delusion... a most insane claim.

Don't try to join reality, it sucks - (do your grandkids know you posts insane claims about 9/11, mocking the murder of thousands? )

How did the evil government fake what people saw? Radar data? How many evil government people are in your delusional version of 9/11 to fake the whole event?

How many families have you contacted in person to tell them their loved ones did not die, but were faked out of life? Why are you spreading the dumbest lies about 9/11?
 
yankee451 said:
Dropping by to check out the comments. As usual, the true believers can't get past the television show. So, for those of you who are critical thinking-challenged:

Have you ever seen the movie of the bank heist where the criminals put a photo of the bank vault in front of the security camera to dupe the guards into thinking the vault is okay, while it’s being robbed? The wily criminals simply hide their vault-cracking activities behind a photograph of a pristine vault. It works every time (at least in Hollywood). Shows like Hudson Hawk, Speed, and Mission Impossible, old and new, have used this camera-spoofing technique.
https://911crashtest.org/pulling-the-wool-over-the-eyes-of-the-world/
Click to expand...


Your reference correctly mentions why the fake photo in front of a camera will most likely not work. However, when it drools over the supposed reliability of a proposed "slice and dice" scenario, it fails miserably, just as YOUR critical thinking has in its assessment. The inserted CGI miraculously matches the EXACT spots and destruction pattern where the planes hit, including the blowout from the portions of the building away from the impact site. Even the best simulations cannot predict the precise shapes and configurations of these well-documented after-effects. Your amateurish pretense of a credible scenario is NOT a critical evaluation, nor a plausible method for deception. It is a comic-book narrative for a childish fantasy with no basis in reality.
 
Bump :Addressed to Yankee451
Greetings Yankee - Fonebone here.
Your "smoking Gun " thread is one year and a few days old and the views are approaching twenty five thousand. Time for an update if you have uncovered
additional evidence. Thanks -Fonebone
 
Fonebone said:
Evidence in addition to the evidence submitted in the thread OP
video.
https://vimeo.com/741646536
Click to expand...

As an example of poor image analysis, in the video of U 175 crashing into the south tower. IIRC the wing has "entered into the tower, or words to that effect, but where is the hole/damage? When the video was stopped the wing completely cover the damage/hole. What nonsense to say there was no damage. The wings beginning to break open as the video from Purdue shows of AA 11 and the inferno begins, no mystery here and no phantom missile, just jet fuel combusting.
 
bknight said:
As an example of poor image analysis, in the video of U 175 crashing into the south tower. IIRC the wing has "entered into the tower, or words to that effect, but where is the hole/damage? When the video was stopped the wing completely cover the damage/hole. What nonsense to say there was no damage. The wings beginning to break open as the video from Purdue shows of AA 11 and the inferno begins, no mystery here and no phantom missile, just jet fuel combusting.
Click to expand...

Continuing with the above example after a second or two the pane disappears into the building and lo and behold a hole in the building, how curious a plane with a lot of momentum has created a hole in a building. The momentum was sufficient to destroy building I beams made of steel. It's all physics, not rocket science nor dilutional beliefs of missiles.
 
Fonebone said:
Bump :Addressed to Yankee451
Greetings Yankee - Fonebone here.
Your "smoking Gun " thread is one year and a few days old and the views are approaching twenty five thousand. Time for an update if you have uncovered
additional evidence. Thanks -Fonebone
Click to expand...

It's been almost 22 years but you believe that some manner of newly discovered evidence of a vast and incredibly complex and complicated conspiracy will magically appear.
That is textbook dusional thinking.

Oh and Yankee....love the use of fictional stories as some sort of proof of concept. Next up, a Scooby-Doo reference? Maybe Thor himself will appear, or perhaps Micheal Keaton in his Batman suit....but the 1989 Batman cut it was da bomb.
 
Re: the cloaked missile that hits the building. If it passes THROUGH the structure and is visible exiting it on the other side, then the missile did not explode inside the building.
 
Guys... there's something to be said for dealing with 'low-hanging fruit'... Steve is best ignored.
 
jaydeehess said:
Re: the cloaked missile that hits the building. If it passes THROUGH the structure and is visible exiting it on the other side, then the missile did not explode inside the building.
Click to expand...


This is a cameo of the AGM86D missile.









Fonebone said:
Image of the alleged missile:



Another image of the same missile
AGM-86D


One of the many munition payloads of this delivery systems is a FAE thermobaric Napalm and Napalm2 incendiary warhead.
F.A.E. = Fuel Air Explosive.
Napalm is a FAE is a Naphthalene & palm oil that creates a Fireball with a petroleum thick black mushroom smoke cloud. Naphalm2 is a
chemical exothermic payload replacement for Napalm and produces a whitish tan-gray smoke mushroom cloud
Click to expand...


This is the missile suspect...
An AGM-86D cruise missile.
 
jaydeehess said:
Re: the cloaked missile that hits the building. If it passes THROUGH the structure and is visible exiting it on the other side, then the missile did not explode inside the building.
Click to expand...


--And--
this post outlines the missile path thru the WTC2 south wall and
the missile nose as it exits the North wall at the North-East bevel.
NOSE IN -
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=7443177#post7443177




NOSE OUT -

Note the nose shaped shadow cast horizontally on the partially sun-lit north wall as the missile nose exits.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom