• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Transwomen are not women - X (XY?)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Elaedith said:
Interesting thread from MurrayBlackburnMackenzie on the response to an freedom of information request to the Scottish prison service asking for details of the equality impact assessment undertaken on their trans prisoner policy. This request was necessary because they do not list the EQIA for this on their website, despite all other EQIAs being listed.

The response to the the FOI showed:

The final policy document was authored by the manager of the Scottish trans alliance
'The Scottish Trans Alliance and Stonewall Scotland were consulted but no women’s groups were consulted.'
Reports from trans activist organisations GIRES and Gendered Intelligence were cited, although they made no reference to prisons
The Yogyakarta Principles were cited
Sex was not identified as one of the protected characteristics for those affected by the policy.
The EQIA focuses almost entirely on how trans prisoners would be affected

Of course we know this can't be true because we have it on good authority that all these policies are thoroughly researched, based on expert opinion, and consider the rights of all parties. It is shocking that the SPS would lie in this way in their response to an FOI. /s
Click to expand...

That policy document attached to the response to the FOI request looks like it was put together by a work experience student. Typos and grammar errors everywhere and sentences like this:

“Transgender people potential could come to prison and the SPS policy or guidance to support
or manage a transgender person if they come into prison.”

If this is SOP for the SPS and FOI staff Scotland is truely ******.
 
LondonJohn said:
LOL One article by an anti-transgender-identity activist (you should maybe check out his Twitter page....).

And by the way (and entirely relevantly), most of the good old general public of England & Wales were against the decriminalisation of consensual private gay sex when that took place in 1967. Shockingly, gay sex wasn't decriminalised in Scotland until 1980, at which point only a small majority of the Scottish public didn't regard it as a legitimate criminal offence.

Oh, and a sizeable majority of the general public in most of the Southern US states were not in favour of granting civil rights to black people in the 50s/60s.

"A turning of the tide" hehehehe. I guess when one delights in mocking and denying transgender identity, wishful thinking must come in very handy.
Click to expand...

This “argument” of yours has failed each and every time you have made it. Do you think that boredom will lead to people to agree with this faulty and irrelevant analogy?
 
LondonJohn said:
* Of course I don't wonder if it's occurred to them: zealous evangelical cults are not known for their objectivity and self-awareness/self-criticism when it comes to their particular "religion".
Click to expand...

This is a perfect description of Stonewall and Mermaids. Thanks for the insight.
 
lionking said:
That policy document attached to the response to the FOI request looks like it was put together by a work experience student. Typos and grammar errors everywhere and sentences like this:

“Transgender people potential could come to prison and the SPS policy or guidance to support
or manage a transgender person if they come into prison.”

If this is SOP for the SPS and FOI staff Scotland is truely ******.
Click to expand...

Or this one which was pointed out in the thread: 'SPS could be at risk of corporate discrimination if they miss manage [sic] a transgender person.'

They also substitute gender for sex and gender identity for gender reassignment in the list of protected characteristics (although only the latter was identified as one affected). This reflects the influence of lobby groups who want to replace sex with gender and gender reassignment with gender identity in the UK Equality Act. The strategy is to 'get ahead of the legislation' by convincing orgs to use these terms for equality monitoring although they are not actually protected characteristics.
 
Last edited:
It's kind of depressing that the best data we have on the advisability of self-ID is coming from actually trying it out in womens' prisons, rather than from any unfettered attempt to study the problem scientifically in an ethical way. Even LJ has no idea if self-ID is a good way to treat gender dysphoria.
 
Last edited:
lionking said:
That policy document attached to the response to the FOI request looks like it was put together by a work experience student. Typos and grammar errors everywhere and sentences like this:

“Transgender people potential could come to prison and the SPS policy or guidance to support
or manage a transgender person if they come into prison.”

If this is SOP for the SPS and FOI staff Scotland is truely ******.
Click to expand...

This is the only (possible) mention I can find of impact on anyone other than the trans prisoner:

'There are vulnerable people in prison when faced by a trans person (pre operation) might induce fear to that person' [sic]

I'm not even sure if it is about impact on anyone else because it isn't clear who 'that person' refers to.
 
I could write better English than that when I was ten.

That's the rigorous safeguarding protocol LJ keeps banging on about.
 
If all you've got is "Look at what you just posted, that's vile!" and "experts (uncited) agree with me!" and "right side of history!", you're struggling.
 
Here is another (composite) clip of Rhona Hotchkiss speaking to a public meeting - not one that I attended, as I haven't been to a meeting since covid struck and this one was 2021.

https://twitter.com/treesey/status/1619753439835340805

I hadn't heard all of that before. It's unconscionable what's being done to incarcerated women by this inhuman policy, and I'd think slightly better of John if he would address this issue rather than just rocking up with his hateful ad hominems every day or two.
 
'This Policy will provided [sic] a clear and transparent pathway for Tran’s [sic] people entering prison, it will take massive steps in eliminating discrimination towards trans people by treating trans people with respect in the SPS. By providing staff with information of the correct steps to support the transition of a person enter [sic] or in prison.'

What do you think they mean by 'transition' here?
 
Last edited:
Your midnight check-in on the petition reports 77,003 signatures, so 325 new signatures today. A relatively quiet day considering the continuing fuss, but still comfortably ahead of target.

The new magic number is 283.9.
 
I'm curious about "correct steps" myself. Obviously, "correct" can simply mean those are the steps you must take to be correct according to the official policy guidelines. But I wonder if there's any attempt to find the correct steps according to some sort of medical or ethical standard beyond recursion to the text of the policy itself.
 
Last edited:
WHO did you consult with?

Trans people in prison and in the community
SPS Mangers and Officers ( including E& D Managers)
Trade Union
Government Agencies (including Scottish Government and English Prison Service)
SPS Legal Branch
Scottish Transgender Alliance
Capability Scotland
Stonewall Scotland
 
LondonJohn said:
LOL One article by an anti-transgender-identity activist (you should maybe check out his Twitter page....).
Click to expand...

In case you wanted to do just that, here it is (LondonJohn seems to have forgotten to link to it, no doubt an oversight on his behalf):

https://twitter.com/CalumA_Steele

It describes him as General Secretary @ICPRA (International Council of Police Representative Associations), Past President @Euro_Cop (eurocop.org), General Secretary @Scotspolfed (Scottish Police Federation).

Weirdly there's no mention of his work as an "anti-transgender-identity activist".
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom