No, Guede was not 'playing the race card'. He concurs that it might have been his own internal narrative. It is only YOUR conjecture that he was 'playing the race card'.
As previously shown to you already, but which you choose to ignore because it doesn't suit your agenda, is this little tidbit from Judge Michelli:
[252] The presumed attacker’s behaviour, and in particular the words which he had addressed to no one knows who (to AMANDA, it must be presumed, remaining in the shadows in the house but reappearing
on the lane in the contest of her running away), and then in his turn unreasonable: given the mismatch in force between the knife and the chair, and of the strangeness that to then run away was the one holding the first rather than the second, to say something like “black man found, here’s the guilty party” makes no sense. The only person who could have seen any meaning in that phrase was, by sheer coincidence, RUDY himself, because it served him for justifying his reluctant behaviour in calling for help,not to mention his subsequent decamping: in his account, which at this point must be considered convenient, that phrase lingers on the pen nib, because – and in somewhat moving terms – it can be of worth in describing and explaining his state of mind and his behaviour subsequent to the fact, but from the point of view of the one who said it, it was an incomprehensible nonsense.
You tell me, Vix:
what was the motivation for Guede to claim "“black man found, here’s the guilty party” other than to set up a scenario where he'll be blamed because he's black? Go on...give it try.
I wonder why you delight in using that phrase.
I wonder why you delight in trying to (unsuccessfully) convince us that Guede must have been convicted because he was black and not for the overwhelming evidence that he killed Kercher?
As for the Italian racism you highlight, it is not generational or systemic in the way the US prosecutor you cited was (bribing a witness to put two Black guys in jail knowing it would be extremely difficult for them to prove innocence).
You do insist on misrepresenting this. It's tiresome. You keep attempting to restrict Italian systemic and generational racism to the examples I gave for how prosecutors can be dishonest.
Italians can be as racist as anyone, especially as they are given permission from their far right governments. However, it is nonsense to say that Mignini prosecuting Knox and Sollecito is a parallel with your US prosecutor. Inverse racism? Really.
Really, Vix...do you think people here can't read what was actually said versus your continual spin? I have never said any such thing. Your habit of repeating a lie does not make it so; please stop doing it.
As for the phone logs, it is a legal finding of fact* that the phone logs prove Knox was not home with her boyfriend all night. Do read Marasca-Bruno.
Exactly how did the phone logs prove she wasn't home that night? She neither made nor received any call after noon on Nov. 1 and around noon on Nov. 2 other than the two Lumumba related texts.
Court testimony showed both were handled by cell towers (the non-rotating kind!) that served Raffaele's apartment:
Lumumba to Knox text at 20:18:12
Via dell'Aquila,n. 5-Torre dell'Acquedotto, Sett 3
FROM MASSEI’S REPORT PAGE 318:
“1. The area around the defendant’s [Raffaele] home was reached by a very strong signal radiated from the Via Berardi sector 7 cell, indicated as being the‚ best server cell‛ with regard to Sollecito’s house;
furthermore the signals of other cells are also powerful, respectively that with a pylon in Piazza Lupattelli sector 8 and that with a pylon
in Via dell’Acquilla -Torre dell’Acquedotto sectors 3 and 9.”
MASSEI REPORT PAGE 323:
“-12.08.44 (lasted 68 seconds) Amanda calls Romanelli Filomena on number 347-1073006; the mobile phone connects to the Via dell’Aquila 5-Torre dell’Acquedotto sector 3 cell (which covers Sollecito’s house)
“− 12:11:02 (3 seconds) the Vodafone number 348-4673711 belonging to Meredith (this is the one [i.e. SIM card] registered to Romanelli Filomena) is called and its answering service is activated (
cell used: Via dell’Aquila 5-Torre dell’Acquedotto sector 3 “
“− 12:11:54 (4 seconds): another call is made towards Meredith’s English mobile phone number (the cell used is the one in
Via dell’Aquila 5-Torre dell’Acquedotto sector 3, thus compatible with Sollecito’s house)”
“− 12:12:35 (lasting 36 seconds) Romanelli Filomena calls Amanda Knox (No. 348-4673590);
Amanda receives the call connecting to the cell on Via dell’Aquila 5-Torre dell’Acquedotto sector 3 (still at Raffaele’s house)”
Knox to Lumumba text at 20:35:48
Via T. Berardi, Sett. 7
FROM MASSEI’S REPORT PAGE 318:
“1. The area around the defendant’s [Raffaele] home was reached by a very strong signal radiated from the Via Berardi sector 7 cell, indicated as being the‚ best server cell‛ with regard to Sollecito’s house; furthermore the signals of other cells are also powerful, respectively that with a pylon in Piazza Lupattelli sector 8 and that with a pylon in Via dell’Acquilla -Torre dell’Acquedotto sectors 3 and 9."
As for the location of the apparatus [the phone], the call made at 20:42:56 on 1.11.07
used the Via Beradi sector 7 cell, which serves the houses located along Corso Garibaldi.
Massei pg 317
At 06:02:59 on 2.11.07 (first contact of the day), the mobile phone received an SMS sent from the mobile phone of the father, Dr Francesco Sollecito, using the reception, in this case also, of the same base transceiver station on
Via Beradi sector 7
*As well as objective scientific evidence.
Proof from your cherished Massei "merits court"
based on the technical experts' testimony, that phones logs do NOT prove that Knox was away from RS's apartment that night.
What else ya got?
