Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
It is true that, like Wildy correctly said, I oppose Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine, [...]
No, that isn't true at all. You say you oppose it, then speak in support of it.
Dave
It is true that, like Wildy correctly said, I oppose Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine, [...]
There should be no reward for illegal aggression
Just to save you some time if you aren't algorithmically given the tweet, but our friend here decided to tweet his "peace plan" directly to the First Lady of Ukraine.
Not really, because these places were already under Russian or pro-Russian control before February 24....except Luhansk, Donetsk and the Crimea, right?
Dave
Because I found that it works better that way (I get more replies).I wonder why he bothered tweeting when he believes everybody in the world can read his mind.
Dave
Because I found that it works better that way (I get more replies).
It is easier for the U.S. to send rocket launchers and tanks to Ukraine than to win hearts and minds in Crimea.Tell yourself whatever you like. Your silly little peace idea is going nowhere.
Want proof? Watch the news. We're sending Ukraine more HIMARS and planning to transition them to American and other NATO tanks. Soon, all of Crimea will be under Ukrainian fires and the few people you got your idea out to will have pretended you never existed. You'll complain but the bombs and missiles will keep landing until Russia gets out of all of Ukraine and returns to their 2014 borders.
It is easier for the U.S. to send rocket launchers and tanks to Ukraine than to win hearts and minds in Crimea.
The US has certainly a history and a potential to create trouble around the world through incompetent meddling.
We still remember their disastrous adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq.
HIMARS cannot defeat Russia's most dangerous weapons.
It is easier for the U.S. to send rocket launchers and tanks to Ukraine than to win hearts and minds in Crimea.
The US has certainly a history and a potential to create trouble around the world through incompetent meddling.
We still remember their disastrous adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq.
HIMARS cannot defeat Russia's most dangerous weapons.
If you want to talk disastrous interventions in Afghanistan, a previous venture by what was essentially Russia brought down regimes from Moscow to East Berlin!It is easier for the U.S. to send rocket launchers and tanks to Ukraine than to win hearts and minds in Crimea.
The US has certainly a history and a potential to create trouble around the world through incompetent meddling.
We still remember their disastrous adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq.
HIMARS cannot defeat Russia's most dangerous weapons.
Just to save you some time if you aren't algorithmically given the tweet, but our friend here decided to tweet his "peace plan" directly to the First Lady of Ukraine.
How about this for a peace plan:
Russia withdraws to its pre-2014 borders, ceases meddling in the affairs of other countries, Donbas and Crimea are returned to Ukraine, Russia pays reparations to Ukraine for the infrastructure that they destroyed during the war, and turns over all war criminals for trial in the Hague?
Perfect plan for complete peace in the region.
Come on, Green Bird, telling Russia it has to leave isn't rewarding Russia.
These things have to be assessed in context, Green Bird.Yes it is, Russian Propagandist, when there is no penalty for them for causing the bloody invasion in the first place, and when you also leave them with Crimea, allow them to keep extra territory they have stolen in the Donbas, stop Ukraine from joining Nato, and remove the sanctions.
In what way are they punished for their invasion? How are they held accountable for all the damage they have caused? All the people they killed, including non-combatants, women and children? All the rapes? All the theft? All the war crimes?
Your peace plan gives them everything they wanted in the first place, and effectively says, oh, well, nice try, didn't work this time, never mind.
But that's because you are a Russian propagandist, and actually support their fascist invasion.
As I said, you disgust me.
He got a few replies, but this one sums it up nicely...
https://twitter.com/ItsMe74855380/status/1567516013016522752
The First Lady was far more polite than he deserved...
https://twitter.com/ZelenskaUA/status/1567182927703728129
I would add in giving Ukraine back their nukes. Russia violated the agreement that ukraine gave them up, so russia should give them back.
Besides, when your house is on fire, the first duty is to stop the fire, not to try to argue about who is responsible and must pay compensations. People must take care of the essential aspects first.
These things have to be assessed in context, Green Bird.
Did the US compensate Afghanistan and Iraq after its illegal invasion of these countries, in 2001 and 2003 (and they did not invade just 20% of these countries)?
No, I don't think so.
Did NATO compensate Yugoslavia after its illegal, 3 months long, bombing campaign in 1999?
No, I don't think so.
Did the US (Israel's main supporter) compensate Palestine for its more than 50 years long illegal occupation?
No.
Did Ukraine and NATO countries compensate Russia after their unfair and illegal economic sanctions since 2014, which have cost a lot of money to the Russian economy? Of course not.
There was no genocide in Kosovo. The president of Kosovo Ibrahim Rugova was himself against the (illegal) bombing conducted by NATO (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_the_Radio_Television_of_Serbia_headquarters). I suspect Clinton wanted a kind of revenge after the Lewinsky scandal, in 1998.Whataboutism, as I would expect from a Russian propagandist. Irrelevant to the current discussion. Still, since you want to go there, Nato bombing to stop the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Albanians would have got UN approval it was not vetoed by, you guessed it, Russia.
I am unsurprised to see you on the side of genocide and ethnic cleansing. After all, its what you are.