9/11: The Smoking Gun

[bknight]

I must have missed where you explained how the jet wing managed to cut the steel behind the aluminum sheeting but didn't cut the sheeting that covered the steel, and in fact, pushed it out in the opposite direction than the wing was traveling. That's one magic loogie!

Funny, where in my post did I describe/reference the damage you described?
In your "belief" cruise missiles of some sort created the damage not an airline. For this to happen I ask how a cruise missile would not do the same damage that you show? Talking out of both sides of your mouth and yet both are wrong.

ETA: Any flying vehicle would do the same damage that you describe incorrectly.

 

[Stellafane]

My God, 20+ years later, and there's still some sorting through the blurry pixels in search of relevance.

 

[Gamolon]

I must have missed where you explained how the jet wing managed to cut the steel behind the aluminum sheeting but didn't cut the sheeting that covered the steel, and in fact, pushed it out in the opposite direction than the wing was traveling. That's one magic loogie!

See image below.

Are you saying the warhead/missile impacted the perimeter columns where the red arrow points, ripped the steel plate in the blue oval away, and separated the aluminum cladding from the column pushing it in the direction of the yellow arrows?




How did the missile/warhead's wings not cut the aluminum cladding like it did the steel plates? How did it just push it aside?

That's one magic missile!!!

 

[smartcooky]

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/WTC2_5th_column_from_left_center_right_with_circle.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/WTC2_5th_column_from_left_cladding_with_hole-1024x768.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/South-Tower-Close-up-with-notations-1024x640.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Warhead-gouged-through-columns-but-passed-behind-the-cladding-2.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/wing-burst.png

https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Wing-hits-column-1.png

Six examples of the adage "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing", as yankee451 demonstrates his complete lack of understanding as regards aircraft impact damage.
.
.

 

[yankee451]

See image below.

Are you saying the warhead/missile impacted the perimeter columns where the red arrow points, ripped the steel plate in the blue oval away, and separated the aluminum cladding from the column pushing it in the direction of the yellow arrows?


[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_13409632b3a7c51938.png[/qimg]

How did the missile/warhead's wings not cut the aluminum cladding like it did the steel plates? How did it just push it aside?


That's one magic missile!!!

A missile wing is not the same as its warhead, right? Have you even watched the video?

 

[yankee451]

My God, 20+ years later, and there's still some sorting through the blurry pixels in search of relevance.

21 years ago, those same blurry pixels were enough to justify the invasion, looting, and occupation of several nations. Destruction of these sovereign nations resulted in tens of thousands of refugees moving to Europe, where a clash of cultures is occurring. 9/11 impacts all of our lives, all the time. It is important.

 

[Axxman300]

21 years ago, those same blurry pixels were enough to justify the invasion, looting, and occupation of several nations. Destruction of these sovereign nations resulted in tens of thousands of refugees moving to Europe, where a clash of cultures is occurring. 9/11 impacts all of our lives, all the time. It is important.

Several nations?

Name them.

What did we take?

 

[Stellafane]

21 years ago, those same blurry pixels were enough to justify the invasion, looting, and occupation of several nations. Destruction of these sovereign nations resulted in tens of thousands of refugees moving to Europe, where a clash of cultures is occurring. 9/11 impacts all of our lives, all the time. It is important.

It wasn't the pixels that convinced the U.S.A. to take action, but rather the galaxy of other evidence so compelling and overwhelming that no rational and informed person could come up with any other conclusion.

 

[yankee451]

Several nations?

Name them.

What did we take?

"We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

Why don't you just explain how the jet wing could cut three sides of the steel, but missed the aluminum sheeting that covered the steel?

 

[Gamolon]

A missile wing is not the same as its warhead, right? Have you even watched the video?

Yeah, I watched your video. Here's what you said in the screenshot below in the circled text box:

This cladding is cut on two sides, but still attached to the face. It was pushed out from within by the passage of the warhead between it and the column it was once attached to

Then there's this part of your video the wing pointed at by the red arrow:



So my question to you is, how did the missile/warhead pass between the box column AND the aluminum cladding without the wing shown in the second screenshot ripping the cladding away? Furthermore, how did that cladding get a dent/mark on the OUTSIDE face if the missile warhead passed between the column and the INSIDE face of the cladding?

 

[threadworm]

I must have missed where you explained how the jet wing managed to cut the steel behind the aluminum sheeting but didn't cut the sheeting that covered the steel, and in fact, pushed it out in the opposite direction than the wing was traveling. That's one magic loogie!

I must have missed the bit where you provided anything remotely resembling any kind of hint of a proof for your ridiculous, nonsensical fabrication.

 

[Axxman300]

"We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

Why don't you just explain how the jet wing could cut three sides of the steel, but missed the aluminum sheeting that covered the steel?

You said we invaded, "Several countries". Name them.

You said countries were "looted". What did we take?

Why don't you explain where this missile came from. I ask because the missile you claim was used was not operational.
If a missile was used, what was its serial number?
Where was it stored?
Who signed it out?
What did the December, 2001, and April, 2002 inventories of those USAF storage facilities reveal, and were any other missiles missing?
What kind of aircraft launched the missiles?
Why didn't this aircraft show up on radar?
Why didn't the ground crew for this aircraft notice a pair of armed, secret cruise missiles did not return with the plane?
How is that none of the ground crew, pilots, aircontrol tower personnel, or the munitions crews have ever come forward?

Then there's the obvious question: How did they get thousands of gallons of jet fuel into both towers of the WTC without anyone noticing the four+ tanker trucks parked on the street, with hoses running into the building?
When were those storage tanks built inside WTC1 & WTC2 to disguise the fuel bladders, and why didn't anyone notice, nor report this?
What kind of reinforcement was made to WTC1 & WTC2 to hold the structural load of 20,000 gallons of jet fuel, and the support structure for the fuel bladders?

I mean, you must have answers for this part of your theory, right? Those missiles you claim were used had nowhere near the fuel to cause the fires. So how'd they do it?

 

[Axxman300]

Wouldn't the smarter conspiracy be one where the attacks were staged, and the Twin Towers are, in fact, still standing, but hidden by Israeli-designed holograms?

If you're going off the deep end with phantom missiles, why not at least go completely bonkers?

 

[smartcooky]

Wouldn't the smarter conspiracy be one where the attacks were staged, and the Twin Towers are, in fact, still standing, but hidden by Israeli-designed holograms?

If you're going off the deep end with phantom missiles, why not at least go completely bonkers?

Nope, the Twin Towers definitely fell - burned to the ground by Jewish Space Lasers!

 

[SpitfireIX]

Nope, the Twin Towers definitely fell - burned to the ground by Jewish Space Lasers!

Which were powered by Hurricane Erin.

 

[Gamolon]

A missile wing is not the same as its warhead, right? Have you even watched the video?

Different pieces of your supposed analysis aren't even matching! See below:



In your edited photo (screenshot image at the bottom, which I snipped and turned upside down), you claim the first two columns were hit by the wing, which dented the aluminum cladding (red arrows matching these two columns in each screenshot).

For the next column (blue arrow), you say the fuselage of the missile hit the column yet in the top screenshot the fuselage will completely miss it.

The next column after that (yellow arrow), you say the warhead hit the column yet in the top screenshot, it misses that column.

In the screenshot below, explain why you show no damage whatsoever to the column I circled when you clearly show the wing impacting it?


What happened to the rest of the missile including the right wing?


Where's the right wing of the missile that would have ripped that cladding off?


You clearly don't care about your different pieces of evidence corroborating/matching each other. All in the name of fitting a square peg into a round hole.

Very sloppy work indeed!

 

[Gamolon]

A missile wing is not the same as its warhead, right? Have you even watched the video?

Where's the missile's left wing damage for the first two columns (in the red oval) in the screenshot below?


You really didn't think this through did you?

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Where's the missile's left wing damage for the first two columns (in the red oval) in the screenshot below?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_13409632c50884400e.png[/qimg]

You really didn't think this through did you?

I have pointed out to yankee451 that, according to his own figures, the missiles would have been too wide to pass between the columns without impacting them.
I have yet to see him reassess his claims in the light of this fact.

 

[yankee451]

Which were powered by Hurricane Erin.

Nyuck, Nyuck. Because all "no planers" are associated with JudyWoodtards.

 

[bknight]

21 years ago, those same blurry pixels were enough to justify the invasion, looting, and occupation of several nations. Destruction of these sovereign nations resulted in tens of thousands of refugees moving to Europe, where a clash of cultures is occurring. 9/11 impacts all of our lives, all the time. It is important.

The only blurry aspect is your total lack of evidence, lack of knowledge of strength of materials and obvious overlooking evidence that destroys your pathetic belief.
please describe in detail "pushed it out in the opposite direction than the wing was traveling"