• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Supernatural Part II

Hello
"We" years before you study the Chinese Tang Empire. we have read And we have had a political analysis for it. Of course, this topic was done by an expert and doctorate in religions and history from Sorbonne University. who is one of our proud compatriots. And I have researched and investigated by studying his works about 32 years ago.
"We" use the collective pronoun with full power when our studies and researches have a collective and complete aspect. I have mentioned this before. Unfortunately, you entered our discussion late or you forgot.
to see
This way of evaluating and checking someone's words is a waste of time. And you do not reach a conclusion. This is an example of muddy water fishing. You will not get fish.

Name and email address of this claimed authority, please.
 
Hello
We accept your scientific models for proving scientific facts. But our speech is not a proof of scientific truth. pay attention. Rather, we say that in the Quran, this subject of modern science was claimed 14 centuries ago. .


There is no such thing as "scientific facts" ... there are simply some things that most people in the world regard as "facts" ... that's not a scientific fact or a religious fact or an adults fact or a childrens fact or a Nigerian fact ... a "fact" is something that is true everywhere for everyone.

However, you need to understand this - science does not claim to find or establish "facts". And that's because science has discovered that no matter how certain and "factual" anything might appear to be, still there must always remain some uncertainty, however small, unless & until we can produce a literal 100% certain "proof" ... and what we have found from Quantum Theory is that a literal absolute "proof" is probably not possible for anything in this universe … we can determine things scientifically as being probably 99.999999999% likley, but we cannot ever determine them as 100% certain.

On your second point of claiming that modern science was revealed in the 7th century Quran - as everyone here has repeatedly told you - you have not actually found even one verse in the Quran that describes modern science ... and current-day top-level published science agrees with that, ie science finds no evidence of any modern science in the Quran ...

... what you have is simply a religiously driven belief that you can see science in the words of the Quran. But as I said to you before - unsurprisingly Muslims (like yourself) are just like Christian theists when they claim to see evidence of God and evidence of intelligent design in absolutely everything around us everywhere in this entire universe ... they see everything as confirming evidence of God ... though of course, the real truth is that none of things they see are actually designed at all, and science has been explaining that & confirming that lack of design for at least the last 150 years - there is no intelligent purposeful design for anything in this universe.
 
Last edited:
Hello
How do you understand the truth? What is your definition of truth? And how do you know that I am distorting the truth according to your definition?!!??



One more thing about those of us who have accused you of lying and dishonesty here (in my case I am saying that your extreme beliefs in Islam are leading you into constantly lying in order to support that religious belief) -

- much earlier in this thread, on 3 separate occasions I made an offer to you saying I am willing to put aside all my doubts and criticisms of Islam or any such religion, and have an entirely neutral conversation with you about what we can establish, what the world & science has established about religion and holy books such as the bible or the Quran, if you are willing to do the same and put aside for the sake discussion & learning, your beliefs about God and the Quran ... so we have a entirely objective neutral discussion of what can really be ascertained about religion and the Quran ...

... but each time your response to that was to ignore it completely and refuse any reply. That is, by your omission, a refusal by you to have any such genuine open objective neutral discussion.

And that really is a demonstration as clear as can be, that you are only prepared here to preach your religious beliefs and to insist that you are an expert in your beliefs who cannot be wrong and who must never be questioned or doubted or opposed at all ... and that is absolutely NOT an honest way for you to engage in any interaction on this Forum at all. That is a thoroughly dishonest approach from you.
 
Hello
We accept your scientific models for proving scientific facts. But our speech is not a proof of scientific truth. pay attention. Rather, we say that in the Quran, this subject of modern science was claimed 14 centuries ago. And it has been proven in the 20th century. Therefore, the words of the Qur'an and the claims of God are only correct and true in the Qur'an.


And here’s your problem: science doesn’t deal in “truth”. It deals in hypotheses. A hypothesis that has so far resisted disproof, and is well-supported by the evidence, is described as a theory, but even theories can be disproved by further evidence. The current science that you claim is revealed by the Quran is almost certainly not completely correct. It just provides models of the way the universe behaves. The scientific theories that you claim have been divinely revealed will, at some point, be revealed to be defective.

If you had been writing 150 years ago, you would have been claiming that Newton’s theory of gravitation had been revealed in the Quran. If you had been writing 250 years ago you would have been claiming that the Quran had revealed the existence of phlogiston. Your “interpretations” of the Quran are not of an eternal truth, they are just a shoehorning of the Quran into a snapshot of current scientific knowledge.

This is why I have been asking you for testable predictions about future scientific discoveries. Because if you can only predict stuff we already know (even if you get it right, which you don’t) your “predictions” prove nothing.

Show us that the Quran reveals how current science is wrong.
 
Last edited:
2- Interpretation of the Qur'an requires relatively complete knowledge of various sciences. And we have how about you? But apparently you don't have it.

Your understanding of science has been shown by your own postings on the subject is nowhere near complete.

Your "understanding" of almost all of the science you have offered an opinion on could best be described as little to none.
 
Heydarian, can you use your scholarly and scientific expertise to address my question about hell?

You have stated that the temperature of hell is 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 degrees Celsius. Any corporeal being or any corporeal part of a being would be instantly annihilated at such temperatures, leaving (at most) a cloud of formless energy expanding across space at the speed of light.

Let me emphasize that point. 10^22 °C is not a temperature that would cause painful burns to flesh and blood. It would be more like being inside the fireball of a nuclear bomb, except another ten trillion times hotter. The body would be reduced to subatomic energy quanta a million times faster than the nervous system could convey (let alone consciously experience) any pain.

On the other hand, any non-corporeal being, such as a soul or spirit, has no reason to care about what the temperature is at all. Temperature is a statistical description of the frequencies of photons and the movements of particles of matter. There's no reason to think a non-corporeal soul or spirit, not made of photons or any other particle of matter, would be affected by any temperature.

So why do you cite the temperature of hell as a reason to fear? Why should anyone care how hot or cold hell is?
 
Once it’s destroyed the nerve endings it’ll stop hurting.


...which at that temperature would happen at the speed of light, far faster than any nerve impulses could be conducted, as I mentioned.

Tell me that hell is a constant 45°C which would somehow affect my afterlife self in the same way that same temperature would affect my present self, just barely survivable yet eternally miserably uncomfortable, and it's a comprehensible threat, at least if I believe it. But telling me that hell is ten billion trillion degrees just sounds like empty childish rhetoric. Unless Heydarian can answer my questions regarding why it would matter.
 
That is your hypothesis, yes, that knowledge can appear in books centuries before it was discovered. That is an hypothesis about how the world works. That hypothesis requires the same standard of evidence as any other hypothesis to be seriously considered. The process to find that evidence is the first one I gave, not the second one, which is the one you are using. You can provide no objective evidence to support your hypothesis, therefore it is dismissed.

The Qu'ran contains the knowledge and understanding of modern science we would expect it to contain, i.e. none whatever. Your attempts to show otherwise fail abysmally, so your hypothesis is not supported. It seems the world doesn't work like that.
Hello
See the Koran hypothesis that was claimed in the previous 14 centuries. It has been proven by scientists in the 20th century with objective evidence and its details. Therefore, the hypothesis of the Qur'an and the supplication of God alone have been correct. And it is true. In the Qur'an, the details of the findings of each claim are left to humans. And it does not express the details and tests in itself. This management is self-confidence and creating motivation for people, which is completely accepted and superior in management science. God only refers to the realities of the universe that exist in the Qur'an. He leaves the details of discovery to humans. And this management is completely correct. And it is undeniable.
The philosophy of the Qur'an is the philosophy of the originality of existence. That is, it introduces and expresses what exists in the universe. But he leaves discovery, details and experiments to man. Because the Qur'an is a divine book from God only for human creation. And this approach is completely correct and acceptable and valuable. And it is undeniable.
 
Hello
See the Koran hypothesis that was claimed in the previous 14 centuries. It has been proven by scientists in the 20th century with objective evidence and its details. Therefore, the hypothesis of the Qur'an and the supplication of God alone have been correct. And it is true. In the Qur'an, the details of the findings of each claim are left to humans. And it does not express the details and tests in itself. This management is self-confidence and creating motivation for people, which is completely accepted and superior in management science. God only refers to the realities of the universe that exist in the Qur'an. He leaves the details of discovery to humans. And this management is completely correct. And it is undeniable.
The philosophy of the Qur'an is the philosophy of the originality of existence. That is, it introduces and expresses what exists in the universe. But he leaves discovery, details and experiments to man. Because the Qur'an is a divine book from God only for human creation. And this approach is completely correct and acceptable and valuable. And it is undeniable.


I think you mean “unfalsifiable”.
 
Hello
See the Koran hypothesis that was claimed in the previous 14 centuries. It has been proven by scientists in the 20th century with objective evidence and its details. Therefore, the hypothesis of the Qur'an and the supplication of God alone have been correct. And it is true. In the Qur'an, the details of the findings of each claim are left to humans. And it does not express the details and tests in itself. This management is self-confidence and creating motivation for people, which is completely accepted and superior in management science. God only refers to the realities of the universe that exist in the Qur'an. He leaves the details of discovery to humans. And this management is completely correct. And it is undeniable.
The philosophy of the Qur'an is the philosophy of the originality of existence. That is, it introduces and expresses what exists in the universe. But he leaves discovery, details and experiments to man. Because the Qur'an is a divine book from God only for human creation. And this approach is completely correct and acceptable and valuable. And it is undeniable.

Your post has been rejected.
 
Hello
See the Koran hypothesis that was claimed in the previous 14 centuries. It has been proven by scientists in the 20th century with objective evidence and its details. Therefore, the hypothesis of the Qur'an and the supplication of God alone have been correct. And it is true. In the Qur'an, the details of the findings of each claim are left to humans. And it does not express the details and tests in itself. This management is self-confidence and creating motivation for people, which is completely accepted and superior in management science. God only refers to the realities of the universe that exist in the Qur'an. He leaves the details of discovery to humans. And this management is completely correct. And it is undeniable.
The philosophy of the Qur'an is the philosophy of the originality of existence. That is, it introduces and expresses what exists in the universe. But he leaves discovery, details and experiments to man. Because the Qur'an is a divine book from God only for human creation. And this approach is completely correct and acceptable and valuable. And it is undeniable.

Everything in this post is entirely deniable, and rightly denied, because you do not have a shred of objective evidence for any of it. All you have is stubborn, completely unsupported, belief and delusion level wishful thinking.

You must realise by now that you are wasting your time here. None of us have the combination of ignorance and desperate need to believe necessary to buy a word of what you are selling. Why do you persist?
 
Hello
See the Koran hypothesis that was claimed in the previous 14 centuries. It has been proven by scientists in the 20th century with objective evidence and its details. Therefore, the hypothesis of the Qur'an and the supplication of God alone have been correct. And it is true.



Where is the Koran hypothesis of science from 1400 years ago? You never predicted any science from the Koran!

You keep claiming you have science in the Koran. You've been making that claim here for over a year. But you have never been able to produce even one verse with any description of modern science.

Please produce any verse with a description of modern science! You cannot. You do not have it. It's not in any Koran.
 
[...]

You must realise by now that you are wasting your time here. None of us have the combination of ignorance and desperate need to believe necessary to buy a word of what you are selling. Why do you persist?

Heydarian Said,

You have been struggling for many months to convince ISF members that the Qur'an is the correct and holy word of God.

With compassion and kindness toward you, I ask that you turn your attention away from ISF to avoid harm to your own peace and happiness.
 
Last edited:
Once it’s destroyed the nerve endings it’ll stop hurting.

Not according to the following verse from the Quran.


Quran surah 4.56 Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for God is Exalted in Power, Wise.
 
Heydarian, can you use your scholarly and scientific expertise to address my question about hell?

You have stated that the temperature of hell is 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 degrees Celsius. Any corporeal being or any corporeal part of a being would be instantly annihilated at such temperatures, leaving (at most) a cloud of formless energy expanding across space at the speed of light.

Let me emphasize that point. 10^22 °C is not a temperature that would cause painful burns to flesh and blood. It would be more like being inside the fireball of a nuclear bomb, except another ten trillion times hotter. The body would be reduced to subatomic energy quanta a million times faster than the nervous system could convey (let alone consciously experience) any pain.

On the other hand, any non-corporeal being, such as a soul or spirit, has no reason to care about what the temperature is at all. Temperature is a statistical description of the frequencies of photons and the movements of particles of matter. There's no reason to think a non-corporeal soul or spirit, not made of photons or any other particle of matter, would be affected by any temperature.

So why do you cite the temperature of hell as a reason to fear? Why should anyone care how hot or cold hell is?

I have listed some of the horrible verse of hellfire before, and Heydarian has said somewhere that he does not believe in them. In spite of the fact he claims the Quran is the words of God. As for the soul not being affected by temperature, this is what I believe. But Muslims think we are resurrected in our physical bodies in the afterlife.
 

Back
Top Bottom