Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
Yes, it really is. So please start.Isn't it time that; Think logically and wisely and make correct judgments?
Yes, it really is. So please start.Isn't it time that; Think logically and wisely and make correct judgments?
The oldest originals we have of the Quran lack both the vowels and, in places, the dots for the consonants. Dot below= b. Dot above= n. 2 dots above= t, for example.
Then there's the only copy of part of the Quran that was eaten by a goat. Rather careless of Allah, that one.![]()
That is rich, coming from somebody who has demonstrated no expertise whatsoever!You have little expertise even in the field of modern sciences that I wrote in the Quran.
So far you have not demonstrated that the Qur’an has any knowledge more recent than the 7th century, despite your repeated claims.. "The Qur'an has up-to-date content for every time. And that's why it is always eternal. And it never gets old."
Hello
There is no mistake in the Quran.
Hello
There is no mistake in the Quran. The big problem of you and other members in this thread is that; None of you have any expertise in the field of Arabic language and Quranic literature.
And Leda, you judge in vain. You have little expertise even in the field of modern sciences that I wrote in the Quran. I'm really sorry.
Hello
There is no mistake in the Quran. The big problem of you and other members in this thread is that; None of you have any expertise in the field of Arabic language and Quranic literature.
You have little expertise even in the field of modern sciences that I wrote in the Quran.
Hi
Being loud and even punctuating it for the Arab people during the time of Muhammad when the Quran was revealed by God. It has not been mentioned. Because the Quran is in Arabic. And Arab does not need to have vowels and punctuate Arabic words. Therefore, the Qur'an was not punctuated until two centuries after its revelation, as you say. But after two centuries, for the understanding of other people who do not speak Arabic, the Quran was voiced and punctuated by Arab scholars and under the supervision of our Shia Imam. Currently, the most authentic Quran has the sound and punctuation of the Quran written by "Hafs bin Asim". which is available to all nations of the world.
I hope I have answered for you this evening. And that is the answer.
Thank you for your question.
Hello
Of course, there is no more expectation from you to understand Quranic content. You are not in a position to say the updated translation of the Quran or to comment on this matter. You are familiar with the 7th century translation. It is better to stay 14 centuries ago.
Good luck
The Qur'an has up-to-date content for every time. And that's why it is always eternal. And it never gets old."
Currently, the most authentic Quran has the sound and punctuation of the Quran written by "Hafs bin Asim". which is available to all nations of the world.
That is rich, coming from somebody who has demonstrated no expertise whatsoever!
So far you have not demonstrated that the Qur’an has any knowledge more recent than the 7th century, despite your repeated claims.
So, use the up-to-date translation provided by Heydarian and his Ijaz sect.
So, the Quran is always up-to-date, and doesn't need modern translations.
Hafs lived from 706-796CE. So, use an 8th century translation, not the one Heydarian and the Ijaz sect use, and not the original either.
Am I alone is noticing the self-serving contradictions here?
Heydarian Saeed, are you following the readings of Hafs when you say the Quran mentions DNA etc?
Hi
First, I do not speak concisely. And my approach is not to follow brevity at all. Rather, it is innovation, innovation and updating of the translation of Quranic verses according to the principles of meanings and concepts of its words and phrases. Secondly, Hafs bin Asim has worked on the Arabicization, voicing, punctuation and punctuation of the Qur'an. And of course a very admirable thing. Because it has made reading the Quran easy and understandable for other languages of nations. But the first translation of the Quran was by "Ibn Abbas". And he had a skill in the 7th century for translating the Qur'an. And it still is. But unfortunately it is not up to date. And it is old.Please be more careful in the messages and contents you say or quote.
Thanks
I expect that your problem is due to the fact that you are incredibly ignorant as to the topic that you are discussing.
In this case, ...
If your God is actually a God who has all sorts of great powers, and
If what your God has to say is actually so terribly important to us mere humans,
Then, your God should have been considerate enough to have said these important things in several different languages in several different eras so that everyone in the world could benefit from what your God has to say as opposed to your God limiting his discourse to just one narrow slice of the world many centuries ago.
The fact that your God has so terribly limited the dissemination of his own information clearly shows that your God is just another one of the many stupid, worthless, god myths that humans have created over many, many thousands of years.
ِAnd in less than half a century, the Arab people of Arabia conquered and defeated both superpowers of the world.
Hello, dear philosopher
All the contents of modern science of the 20th century that are mentioned in the Qur'an. I only told some of them. And it is completely in the Qur'an and it has been proven. I recommend you and other dear fellow members to increase your knowledge about Arabic language and Quranic literature to understand this issue. To fully understand this issue. Until you have knowledge of the Arabic language and the language and literature of the Qur'an, this issue is not digestible for you. And your objections are based on the Qur'an. I have a question for you: If you want to comment on the content of an article or article, shouldn't your knowledge about the content of that article or article be complete? Otherwise, if you don't know about it, how can you correctly comment on the contents of that article?!
Therefore, if you do not have the knowledge (the knowledge of the Arabic language and the language and literature of the Qur'an and complete familiarity with the multiple meanings of the words of the verses of the Qur'an), your opinion is rejected. And it is in vain. I recommend that you first find a complete knowledge of the Arabic language and the Qur'an and then comment on the content of the verses of the Qur'an.
Thanks
We all understand it perfectly well. And it is uneducated insulting arrogance from you to presume to tell us otherwise.
As far as anyone not understanding Arabic is concerned – any of us here might just as well tell you (as I have done many times) that because you do not understand English language well enough, everything that you have tried to say here in English is in fact wrong, simply because your English is so weak.
Apart from which you are actually talking here always about modern science, and by your own repeated admissions, you are relatively uneducated and ignorant in modern science … whilst many others replying to you here have degree's and doctorates and more, in precisely all of that science that you struggle to understand for even the first baby steps.
So far you have not produced even one single word of any modern science from the Quran. And the reason you do not realise that is because you are not educated in science and not educated in English language.
ِHello
. It is apparently true. But I recommend you read the history of the 7th century to understand how the world was. I'm just pointing out; Two pagan superpowers only existed in the world in the seventh century. One Persian and one Roman.