Who is Mister X?

Crazy Chainsaw said:
1 Fission Fussion Fission Thermonuclear warheads are 1950 techniques.
Click to expand...
Fussion?

2 any attack on one Nato Member is an attack on all and may Nato members have Nukes like TURKEY.
Click to expand...
Turkey does not have nuclear weapons.

The US president cannot command the use of nukes by other NATO members, not even the NATO members that actually have nukes.

3 AND I want to keep his as far as possible from any Launch Button.
Click to expand...
Why? He's been responsible with it in the past.

But I guess if you think that Turkey has nukes, and that the US president can command the launch of tens of thousands of nukes...
 
Last edited:
theprestige said:
Fussion?

(You said there is No such thing as an F3 a Plutonium core, a d
Hydrogen outer core, a U238 outer shell.)

Turkey does not have nuclear weapons.

(TURKEY HAS 50 USA Nukes right now on it's territory.)

The US president cannot command the use of nukes by other NATO members, not even the NATO members that actually have nukes.
(STILL an attack on one member might trigger a launch by all.)

Why? He's been responsible with it in the past.
(Past behavior doesn't predict Future Behaviors of a Lunatic.

But I guess if you think that Turkey has nukes, and that the US president can command the launch of tens of thousands of nukes...
Click to expand...

There are over 13000 Nukes currently in the would I don't want to see any of them used.
 
AFAIK, most of the nuclear weapons in the present US inventory use fission-fusion-fission, at least if they are set for full yield.
 
Last edited:
BazBear said:
AFAIK, most of the nuclear weapons in the present US inventory use fission-fusion-fission, at least if they are set for full yield.
Click to expand...

Yep Planet killers, nuclear winter life enders, hopefully the Cockroaches will remember and laugh at us for our stupidity.
Now you know that I am not the only crazy one.
 
Last edited:
Crazy Chainsaw said:
There are over 13000 Nukes currently in the would I don't want to see any of them used.
Click to expand...

You said the US president had control over tens of thousands of nukes. He doesn't. There aren't even tens of thousands of nukes currently in the world. Let alone under the control of the US president.

And Trump was no more likely to use them than any other president.
 
theprestige said:
You said the US president had control over tens of thousands of nukes. He doesn't. There aren't even tens of thousands of nukes currently in the world. Let alone under the control of the US president.

And Trump was no more likely to use them than any other president.
Click to expand...

Over 13,000 Nuclear weapons world wide and that's just those that are know not hidden.
 
theprestige said:
Turkey doesn't have any of them.

The US president doesn't control tens of thousands.

There aren't even tens of thousands in the world.
Click to expand...

13.000 is in the tens of thousands range.

Are you Trying to get us too tell you how to build Thermonuclear devices, you know spreading that information is Illegal right?
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
13.000 is in the tens of thousands range.
Click to expand...
Thirteen isn't even a plural amount of tens. You need at least two tens to be in the "tens" range. Thirteen thousand is in the thousands range.

You said the US president had control of tens of thousands of nukes. There aren't even tens of thousands of nukes in the entire world. The US president only controls about four thousand nukes - nowhere near the tens of thousands range.

You said Turkey has nukes. Turkey does not have nukes.

Are you Trying to get us too tell you how to build Thermonuclear devices, you know spreading that information is Illegal right?
Click to expand...
Wikipedia tells me all I care to know about the design and manufacture of nuclear weapons.

There's plenty of good, fact-based reasons to not want Trump (back) in office. Why go so far out of your way to pull an obviously wrong reason from your ass? Tens of thousands of nukes? Really? Don't you have enough real things to be worried about, without inventing obviously unreal things as well?
 
theprestige said:
Thirteen isn't even a plural amount of tens. You need at least two tens to be in the "tens" range. Thirteen thousand is in the thousands range.

You said the US president had control of tens of thousands of nukes. There aren't even tens of thousands of nukes in the entire world. The US president only controls about four thousand nukes - nowhere near the tens of thousands range.

You said Turkey has nukes. Turkey does not have nukes.


Wikipedia tells me all I care to know about the design and manufacture of nuclear weapons.

There's plenty of good, fact-based reasons to not want Trump (back) in office. Why go so far out of your way to pull an obviously wrong reason from your ass? Tens of thousands of nukes? Really? Don't you have enough real things to be worried about, without inventing obviously unreal things as well?
Click to expand...

First I don't think having an Idiot Conspiracy Theorist in charge of Nuclear weapons no matter what the Number is.
Secondly your assuming I invented a false narrative instead of making an honest mistake the article I read said tens of thousands of Megatons of Nuclear weapons were in the United States arsenal, the article also I believe got that wrong, it should have been Kilotons not Megatons.
People make unintentional mistakes, as you did saying F3 Thermonuclear devices didn't exist. F 3 is a term Physicist use to describe high yield devices. The Information I have on Nuclear weapons didn't come from Wikipedia.
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
First I don't think having an Idiot Conspiracy Theorist in charge of Nuclear weapons no matter what the Number is.
Click to expand...
It would be nice if you got the number close to right, though.

Secondly your assuming I invented a false narrative instead of making an honest mistake the article I read said tens of thousands of Megatons of Nuclear weapons were in the United States arsenal, the article also I believe got that wrong, it should have been Kilotons not Megatons.
Click to expand...
You've been talking about numbers of weapons, not tonnage.

People make unintentional mistakes, as you did saying F3 Thermonuclear devices didn't exist. F 3 is a term Physicist use to describe high yield devices.
Click to expand...
Agreed. My mistake. I thought you were referring (incorrectly) to the nomenclature of weapon versions in the US arsenal.

The Information I have on Nuclear weapons didn't come from Wikipedia.
Click to expand...
Clearly. If it had, it would be more correct than what you've been saying so far.
 
I tried to find other protests that BLM showed up to counter-protest and I couldn't easily find any. A lot of counter-protesters show up at BLM protests but does BLM ever stage counter-protests?

Maybe they didn't show up because they never show up specifically to counter-protest.


ETA: Here's one where all of 2 BLM supporters showed up at a Drumpf rally:

Newsweek: Trump's Nevada Rally Crowd Chants 'All Lives Matter' at BLM Protesters
Footage from inside the Xtreme Manufacturing facility in Henderson, Nevada, appeared to show at least two demonstrators holding up a flag reading "Black Lives Matter" while raising their fists.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Skeptic Ginger said:
I tried to find other protests that BLM showed up to counter-protest and I couldn't easily find any. A lot of counter-protesters show up at BLM protests but does BLM ever stage counter-protests?

Maybe they didn't show up because they never show up specifically to counter-protest.


ETA: Here's one where all of 2 BLM supporters showed up at a Drumpf rally:

Newsweek: Trump's Nevada Rally Crowd Chants 'All Lives Matter' at BLM Protesters
Click to expand...

Antifa though does show up to counter protest, the Proud Boys but none showed up in Washington.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I tried to find other protests that BLM showed up to counter-protest and I couldn't easily find any. A lot of counter-protesters show up at BLM protests but does BLM ever stage counter-protests?

Maybe they didn't show up because they never show up specifically to counter-protest.


ETA: Here's one where all of 2 BLM supporters showed up at a Drumpf rally:

Newsweek: Trump's Nevada Rally Crowd Chants 'All Lives Matter' at BLM Protesters
Click to expand...

Also BLM tends too target cities where Shootings happen, not just random political Rallies, or the Counter protest police Force events, not political Rallies. The fires were stoked on the 6th though as many BLM antifa supporters thought they couldn't trust the Republicans wouldn't steal the Election for Trump.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/27/utah-militia-armed-group-police-black-lives-matter-protests
 
Craig4 said:
Dude, seriously, you're worried about the wrong thing. There is no hidden hand and there aren't people secretly controlling everything. What you should be worried about is that there's no one in charge.
Click to expand...

A couple of psychologist have stated one reason people buy into conspiracy theories is that the notion that some evil group is behind everything is in many way more comforting then facing the reality that chaos often determins what happenes.
Easier to think there is an evil group in control, and, if we can elimnate them, everything will be just great, then face the unpleasent reality there is no easy quick fix for our problems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom