Cont: Today's Mass Shooting (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
In case you're wondering what lessons cops have learned in the aftermath of the Uvalde mass shooting:

A Seattle school went into lockdown after a deranged man hopped the fence and started chasing students around. Teachers and other school officials managed to deal with the erratically behaving man and direct him away from students. When the cops finally showed up, they initially refused to get out their car and confront the intruder, and tried to claim they couldn't detain, much less arrest, a school intruder unless the principal pointed out particular students who were harmed. Faced with this abdication of duty from the police, the principal walked away from the cop hiding in his car and returned to where the intruder was.

Faced with this embarrassing behavior, they threw the principal under the bus, lying that his refusal to cooperate made it impossible for them to do their jobs.

https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/two-conflicting-stories-what-really-happened-sand-point-elementary/7TXOCPCXERGO5HJX63LIF7HST4/

Of course, local news sources initially ran the cops absurd story totally on their word alone. Obviously the public smelled a rat because none of the claims the cops made are credible. The notion that a school intruder situation is not one where a cop has unambiguous probable cause to make an arrest, especially when the intruder is still present and behaving erratically, is simply not believable.

My neighborhood safety group had a report about this from a neighbor who had 3 kids at the school.
I would like to share about the incident that happened at Sand Point Elementary on Thursday, June 2nd, beginning at 2:15pm. I have read accounts in the press that do not present the accuracy and the gravity of the situation, and I’d like to present the events from the perspective of a family at the school.

I am the Dad of 3 children at SPE (5th, 4th, and 1st grader). My wife is an active volunteer with the Sand Point PTA. All 4 of them were on site and witnessed various portions of the event that transpired.

At ~2:15pm, prior to school dismissal, there was a 5th grade and 1st grade class outside on the playground. My wife was onsite passing out cupcakes on the playground for our 1st grade son’s birthday. At this time, multiple people witnessed a mid-20’s male climb and jump the fence onto school grounds. He was also in possession of a bag that he had thrown over the fence and picked up once on school grounds. (Will refer to him as ‘intruder’ at this point forward).

A teacher saw the intruder and yelled at him to STOP, and that he was not allowed to be on school grounds. The intruder disregarded her and started running after students on the playground. (Multiple students have since said that the intruder was chasing them.)

As this was happening, the teacher yelled for someone to call 911, and for the students to immediately go back into their classroom and call the office. She went to alert and help others to safety. A 5th grade boy alerted the younger students that, “A man just climbed the fence onto school grounds and they needed to go in the building.”

As my wife dialed 911 and began to report the emergency (the time was 2:19pm), the 1st grade teacher gathered younger children to go back into the school building. They would then proceed back into the main building classrooms, whereby they closed windows, locked doors, and told other classrooms and kids they were in lockdown.

The 5th grade students began to run toward the portable buildings, where the 4th and 5th grade classrooms reside. Several students were screaming, and the intruder continued to chase students toward the portables.

Once the 5th graders were in the portable, they closed the door and my 5th grade son called the office and told them, “There’s a man that jumped the fence and is chasing students. He’s coming into our classroom. Send the principal.” The portable door was unable to lock from the inside due to a faulty lock, so several of the students held the door shut as the intruder attempted to enter the classroom. The students resisted, but he was finally able to force the door open and enter the classroom. Students were screaming, crying, and several were responding in panic. My 5th grade son said that it sounded like the intruder was yelling in English as well as another language. The intruder singled out a female student, said that she looked like his sister, grabbed her shirt in his hand, and asked her what her name was. She yelled back at him, “I’m not going to tell you.”

As this was transpiring, the 4th grade teacher who had been next door had heard all the commotion, initially thinking that the screaming outside was the kids playing a game, but quickly realized something was wrong. Her own students were beginning to be scared. (My own daughter later said she was shaking, having a panic attack, and attempting to comfort her friends who were crying, scared, and hysterical.)

The 4th grade teacher entered the 5th grade portable and stepped between the intruder and the students. She began to talk him down and told him to leave. She was able to talk him out of the classroom as the principal arrived and intervened between her and the intruder, talking him away from the students and teacher. The 4th grade teacher gathered all of the 4th/5th grade students into her class and remained in lockdown while the principal urged the intruder away from the school. The principal did not lay hands on him, as he noticed inside the intruder’s bag was free of weapons, and felt he was either mentally unstable or on drugs and did not want to make the situation escalate by making him feel threatened. The intruder was verbally telling the principal to leave him alone and get away, to which the principal responded that he would not leave him alone until the man left school property. The intruder proceeded to walk around outside on school grounds for a period of time (the amount of time was believed to be ~10 min). During this time, he took a students’ backpack, and emptied the contents of his bag into the students backpack.

By this time, several other School authorities had been alerted and started to show up at the scene. A school district supervisor/employee who lives nearby came on site and stepped in to support the principal.

An SPD Officer had responded to the scene by this time but remained in their vehicle. The officer must have received my wife’s number from emergency authorities, because he called her from his vehicle (the time stamp was now 2:32pm on her phone) in an attempt to understand what was going on. He asked my wife if she was a staff member, to which she replied ‘no’ and told the officer the school was in lockdown. The officer’s response told her that he was unaware that the school was in lockdown.

The principal approached the officer’s vehicle at this time, identified himself, and told the officer that the intruder was still on school grounds, needing to be removed from the property. The officer remained in his vehicle and asked the principal to spell his name for him. The principal left the officer at this point to walk back to the intruder and was finally able to usher him off the school property, at which point the officer stepped in and began to talk the man away from the school. The officer was concerned that the man was in possession of stolen property from the school, and verbally stated that he did not want to escalate the situation further by laying his hands on him.

As all this transpired outside, the kids in the school remained in locked until ~2:50pm. Many parents had gathered outside the school building by this time, as it was 20min past normal school dismissal. Many of the classrooms did not know the reason for the lockdown, but those who had witnessed and been part of the events were shaken, crying, and scared. Many of the students had been discussing the recent school shooting in Texas in their classes since last week, and several of them were worried that this kind of event was going to happen to them while they remained in lockdown.

The kids were finally alerted over the intercom that it was safe to leave, and they were all walked out the front of the building and released from school to parents and buses.

I am unable to comment with full accuracy on what transpired after the man left the school grounds. I have been informed that the man may have later taken into custody after an attempted robbery of a DHL truck, and an assault on a Metro bus driver (please correct me if this is inaccurate).

Personally, this has been overwhelming. From what we know and witnessed, I'm most frustrated with the lack of immediate and strong intervention by SPD. I’m also concerned for the safety gaps that this exposed with the facilities of our schools. I’ve been told by school authorities that the building and policies are being evaluated and updated, most notable the locks and door mechanisms of the portable classrooms.

I am fully convinced that the school staff, teachers, and authorities acted in the best interest of the safety of my children and the school community with the information they had. I’m proud of the SPE children, their bravery, and all of the School staff for how they acted in the best interest of our children and community.
Sand Point Elementary School, Seattle, WA

So the principal not cooperating was not wasting time spelling his name to the cop. :rolleyes:

I'll go with the first hand account over news accounts which never get it exactly right and the SPD account which was just as much CYA as seems to be the norm for the cops.
 
Oh come on. This is nonsense of the highest order. Just change the “valid” bit. Pistols might be useful against attacks by crocodiles or sharks, but Australian society gets by without these “valid” weapons just fine.


Well that might be because you don't need to defend yourself against your "bears" (which aren't really bears, but I digress) All you have to do is yell at them and they will get a fright and fall out of their tree.

A 500lb black bear charging towards you at 30 mph... not so much!

Now, why do people take a high calibre pistol with them rather than a rifle when there is a possibility they might encounter bears? Simple - its lightweight, you can keep it in a holster, you can bring it to bear quickly (no pun intended), and you can easily point it wherever you like in the bush. A rifle either has to be carried or slung. Its heavier and is less easy to use.

I have friends that live in rural Klamath Falls OR, who go trail walking and tramping in the forest. They all carry high calibre handguns for protection (one of them is a .44 magnum, I can't remember what the others are) in case they encounter bears. They have seen bears, but never had to defend themselves, yet!
 
It was the obvious exception for handguns where the US genuinely is a special case compared to Western Europe, for example.

Yes it is an outlier, but it's something that any legislation would have to account for. I have no idea what proportion of the Alaskan population, for example, would need such protection.

Indeed. Our gun legislation makes an exception for .22 rimfire semi-automatic rifles, and that is for pest control. You require a special licence to possess or use one, and you either have to be a farmer, a professional pest controller, or working for a government department such as the Department of Conservation, and be involved in pest control

Anyone you claims you can do pest control in this country with a lever action or bolt action rifle has never been to this country and has no idea what they are talking about. You might get away with one for culling opossums, deer, Himalayan tahr or feral goats, but it is hopeless for culling rabbits. Wild rabbits are one of the most serious agricultural and environmental pests in this country - there are literally several millions of them. When you encounter a bunch of rabbits in the wild, with a semi-automatic, you can take out quite a few of them quickly. If you have to work the action between shots, then by the time you are ready to fire, the rest of them have scattered into hiding!
 
......
I have friends that live in rural Klamath Falls OR, who go trail walking and tramping in the forest. They all carry high calibre handguns for protection (one of them is a .44 magnum, I can't remember what the others are) in case they encounter bears. They have seen bears, but never had to defend themselves, yet!

Not to digress too far, but by numerous accounts bear spray is generally considered more effective and easier to use.
https://bear.org/spray-more-effective-than-guns-against-bears-study/
https://www.montanaoutdoor.com/2018/10/bear-spray-vs-gun-which-is-better/

Personally, as a non-outdoorsman, I would try to carry both, and, most important, choose a hiking partner who is a slower runner than me.
 
3 Killed in Shooting at Maryland Manufacturing Facility



I wonder if this one will just be classified as "workplace violence"? I think that is what happens when you shoot and kill up to 13 people at work, if we go by the Fort Hood incident. Sometimes it is just so hard to classify these darn things.


We are in a holding pattern waiting to determine if the race of the shooter should be mentioned or ignored and so we know whether or not to blame it on guns or blame it on the race of the shooter and guns.

Exciting times.
 
Which I think we can all agree on but that isn't going to happen overnight or with one move. We have to start somewhere. I would take disputed action over inaction every day of the week.

Anything is going to take decades to work, just like it took us decades to get into this **** show in the first place.
Bans accompanied by confiscation/buybacks have had a rapid and lasting impact where they have been implemented.

Almost every objection along the lines of "it will take a long time/have minimal effect" fly in the face of existing evidence.

It's just another of the 8,517 variations of the "Because American Exceptionalism" argument from incredulity.

ETA: apologies for not realizing how far back I'd fallen in this discussion :9.
 
Last edited:
Nobody needs to know all that stuff to know that more guns = more deaths.

I talked to several people last weekend that assure me this is not true.

"They'll still get em, look at all the guns coming into the country!"

They aren't!

"Well they will be! They'll make bombs, look at McVeigh."

I swear to ******* gawd this conversation happened.

For Trump supporters only:

A conversation is when two people speak words to each other.
 
The chief of the school district police finally spoke at length about the incident. His statement effectively disclaims any responsibility for any mistakes and/or bad decisions made during the incident that cost lives.

1. Although he is the chief of the school district police and the incident happened on school property making him the scene commander by default, he claims he was unaware that he was the scene commander because nobody told him, so he assumed someone else was in charge. He did not say whom in particular he believed to be the someone else in charge; just...someone else, definitely not him.
2. He did not hear any radio reports about 911 calls, or about anything else regarding the incident whatsoever, because he left both his police radio and his campus-comms radio in the car, because he believed they would "slow him down" and thought they might not work inside some school buildings.
3. He says he did not give any orders to anyone to NOT breach the room, and says the reason it took so long before any breach happened is because it took him that long to personally try "dozens of keys" for the locked classroom door that were brought to him that kept not being the right key.

He says he is open to being interviewed further by the Texas DPS but that he wants to see a transcript of his previous statements first.
 
The chief of the school district police finally spoke at length about the incident. His statement effectively disclaims any responsibility for any mistakes and/or bad decisions made during the incident that cost lives.

1. Although he is the chief of the school district police and the incident happened on school property making him the scene commander by default, he claims he was unaware that he was the scene commander because nobody told him, so he assumed someone else was in charge. He did not say whom in particular he believed to be the someone else in charge; just...someone else, definitely not him.
2. He did not hear any radio reports about 911 calls, or about anything else regarding the incident whatsoever, because he left both his police radio and his campus-comms radio in the car, because he believed they would "slow him down" and thought they might not work inside some school buildings.
3. He says he did not give any orders to anyone to NOT breach the room, and says the reason it took so long before any breach happened is because it took him that long to personally try "dozens of keys" for the locked classroom door that were brought to him that kept not being the right key.

He says he is open to being interviewed further by the Texas DPS but that he wants to see a transcript of his previous statements first.
That goes against the claim we've heard that he made the call it was a suspect in a locked room but it was no longer a suspect shooting kids.

And that goes against the obvious, shots could be heard, kids were in the classroom. And even if he weren't still shooting, some of those kids might have survived if they had gotten medical care sooner.

It's just so sad/disgusting these cops didn't enter that classroom sooner.
 
It is a perfectly legitimate use of a handgun under some specific circumstances.

I spent 5 years in Alaska, and fished often. Bears were common. I wager I’ve been within 50 yds of both Black and Brown bears more than 50 times. I always carried a pistol, because it made me feel better. Research shows that I might have been as safe with just bear spray. If I were not relatively well trained in the use of a handgun, I might have been significantly safer with bear spray than with a pistol.

Require significant training and a license and then rent the pistol from the local government for the specific purpose of self-defense when hunting or fishing in bear country.
And restrict ammunition.

Or issue bear spray and accept the very occasional dead human with the same shrug as the mass murder of children is accepted today. There have been approximately 180 humans killed by bears in the last 240 years; attacks on humans average ~12 per year.
 
Aggressive predators may be something of a different case. Even then, that would lead you more towards a highly accurate weapon and making sure you don't miss. Also, not firing from a position that is vulnerable to a responding attack.
That's fine if you have a hunting license that authorizes you to kill the predators.

Self-defense against bears is different from hunting bears. If you fire from a position that is not vulnerable to an attacking* bear, it probably** isn't self-defense.
*As stated earlier, I have had multiple close encounters with bears. Although I was vulnerable to attack from those bears, none attacked me, so none of those situations would have justified shooting a bear in self-defense.​
**Some jurisdictions define "self-defense" to include defense of property, in which case firing from an invulnerable position can be self-defense.​
 
The fact that other things kill more is the ********* possible reason to not want to stop a type of killing from happening.

**** it no laws because we're all going to die in the eventual heat death of the universe anyway.

Nihilism a horrible personality trait. Selective nihilism is even worse.
 
That's fine if you have a hunting license that authorizes you to kill the predators.



Self-defense against bears is different from hunting bears. If you fire from a position that is not vulnerable to an attacking* bear, it probably** isn't self-defense.

*As stated earlier, I have had multiple close encounters with bears. Although I was vulnerable to attack from those bears, none attacked me, so none of those situations would have justified shooting a bear in self-defense.​

**Some jurisdictions define "self-defense" to include defense of property, in which case firing from an invulnerable position can be self-defense.​

Yes, I came at that inconsistently.

Referring to hunting experience to draw from understanding of firearm (lack of) utility in population culling, but then applying it to livestock/property protection (and again, a very limited license class).
 
Why do you want to pretend that this was not seen as a mass-shooting, when it obviously was?

Hans
From the Boga link:
The mass shooting occurred at Columbia Machine Inc. on June 9, 2022, as the nation was already reeling from mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Buffalo, New York.


Edited to add, there are at least 2 posts on the previous page in the thread about this mass shooting.
 
Last edited:
In this post I'm not taking a side on whether or not to have another ban. But saying that a crime rate went down during an AWB, when the number of semi-auto weapons kept on increasing the entire time does not make any sense to me at all.
One would need to look at who was acquiring those weapons and which weapons they were that the numbers kept increasing.

... Surely it was some other provision of The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 was responsible for the change in the number of shootings. But as far as I know, the AWB portion was the only part that sunset.
And the rate of mass shootings quickly increased. This also makes no sense if it were some other provision of the ban.


A new ban will not be a perfect remedy. The world didn't end with the Brady Bill (AWB) passing. A new assault weapons ban should, at a minimum, be implemented.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom