The Jan. 6 Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
smartcooky said:
FTFY


But of course, I don't expect you will watch any of it, you'll just...

[qimg]https://www.dropbox.com/s/n18379kgkhu79qr/Ostrich-man-head-in-sand.gif?raw=1[/qimg]

... because you are not interested in hearing or seeing anything that might cause you to question your preconceived ultra-conservative, Trump loving worldview!
Click to expand...

It is only wrong if the liberals/leftists/progs do it. When there were questionable calls in Benghazi, the right demanded hearings, and inquests and full coverage to show how wrong and evil the Democrats are, all to reinforce their desire for a right wing one party state.

Now that the shoe is on the other foot, with the right having ACTIVELY attempted to overthrow the elected government. Coverage is a 'dog and pony show' it just 'politics'. Conservatives on the forum are not concerned with the insurrection, because it's what they want!
 
Warp12 said:
It doesn't matter whether something is true or not. What matters is what people believe.
Click to expand...

Ignoring reality always, in the end, bites you in the butt bigtime. It might take a while, but it NEVER end well.
But clear you support the overthrow of a legally elected government.
 
That footage is why I am, at least for now, skeptical about gun control. We might needs to guns to fight a fascist takeover of the US. I know I get laughed at for this,but more and more I am convinced things will not have a peaceful ending in the US. And if it comes to a fight, I want the pro democracy side to win.
Whatever it takes......
 
"I don't support it, I just oppose any negative consequence to it."

What the **** do you think the word "support" means?
 
Ladewig said:
It seems as if you are saying Trump looked at the situation and said, “my supporters will be so out of control that we had better put 10,000 troops between the people counting the votes and my supporters.”

Plus, if he were so concerned that he thought 10,000 troops were needed to protect Congress, why didn’t he tell the crowd “no violence. Do not attack anyone. Peaceful demonstrations.”

Furthermore, how do we explain Trump aides begging Trump for hours to make a statement encouraging peaceful retreating?

Like others in this thread, I’m going to call these claims Bantha poodoo.



ETA
please pardon my strong language.
Click to expand...

Another right winger who tries to pass himself off as a "repectable: conservative who mildly criticses Trump but in the end buys into the FOx News crap.
 
dudalb said:
That footage is why I am, at least for now, skeptical about gun control. We might needs to guns to fight a fascist takeover of the US. I know I get laughed at for this,but more and more I am convinced things will not have a peaceful ending in the US. And if it comes to a fight, I want the pro democracy side to win.
Whatever it takes......
Click to expand...

You won't need the AR-15s. Quit selling the clips to make it hard for the white nationalists to use them.

Just need that well organized militia.
 
wareyin said:
This was posted by your username. Do you think because it's on a different page nobody can read it? Or are you claiming that someone else posted it under your username?
Click to expand...

Let's see what he lies about now so we have to argue with him just go get him back to his original lie.
 
wareyin said:
This was posted by your username. Do you think because it's on a different page nobody can read it? Or are you claiming that someone else posted it under your username?
Click to expand...


What is your point? That is no endorsement of the events that occurred on 1/6.
 
Warp12 said:
What is your point? That is no endorsement of the events that occurred on 1/6.
Click to expand...

That is opposition to any negative consequences for those who orchestrated the events that occured on 1/6. Which...you claimed you don't do. So, again, are you admitting that multiple people post under your username or are you simply lying about what you post when it's so easy to go back one page and read it?
 
wareyin said:
That is opposition to any negative consequences for those who orchestrated the events that occured on 1/6. Which...you claimed you don't do. So, again, are you admitting that multiple people post under your username or are you simply lying about what you post when it's so easy to go back one page and read it?
Click to expand...


Huh? Seriously, what you are saying makes no sense. I have held my position that the 1/6 committee is highly partisan, from the beginning. It does not mean that they cannot possibly uncover wrongdoing.

At no point have I said that those who participated in the events of 1/6 should not be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. That includes any political figures, should the law support support such prosecution.
 
Last edited:
He's playing "Don't you dare say I don't see the forest just because I'm arguing with you every time you say you see a tree" game. It's old, it's played out, and we can all see through it.

He's gonna whine every time we say they are on the Rioter's side, but he's going to be on their side in point in every argument.
 
Warp12 said:
Huh? Seriously, what you are saying makes no sense. I have held my position that the 1/6 committee is highly partisan, from the beginning. It does not mean that they cannot possibly uncover wrongdoing.
Click to expand...

You have opposed the committee, but by opposing them you weren't trying to oppose what they are attempting to accomplish, huh? Sure, sure, pull the other one.

Warp12 said:
At no point have I said that those who participated in the events of 1/6 should not be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. That includes any political figures, should the law support support such prosecution.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you never said that. It's a darn shame you can't actually bring yourself to say that those who participated in the events of 1/6 should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but it's also beside the point that was made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom