The Marjorie Taylor Greene thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
EmptyG spends so much time accusing Biden of having symptoms of dementia. But has no idea how choking the irony is when she grins and says “I don’t recall” after being shown actual videos of herself saying things.

GOP accusations are really confessions.
 
Greene really is a piece of trash. :(

She was asked if she called Pelosi a traitor and replied..."No. No, I haven’t said that,"...The lawyer then played a video of MTG at a rally clearly calling Pelosi a traitor and should be executed for treason. After the video plays, she claims she can't recall saying that.
Click to expand...

Is she so stupid that she thinks claiming "I don't remember" is a valid defense for remarks she's made that were recorded on tape?

I've been on juries several times. In one case the judge reminded us, the law recognizes that witnesses will give false testimony, especially when they have a compelling reason to lie.
 
newyorkguy said:
The judge doesn't have to accept Greene's testimony. This is from a standard "Charge to the Jury:"

Can the people that filed the suit provide rebutting testimony? Such as video clips in which emptyg makes statements that contradict her sworn testimony before the court?
Click to expand...

Thanks. Good reminder. And yes, the video clips were clearly incriminating.

Somehow I doubt though, that the judge is going to specifically say in his ruling that her claiming to not remember anything is not credible.

Of course if he does then perjury charges are the logical follow up. At one point she noted all this was more than a year ago. Could be used to swear she wasn't perjuring herself.

Anyway, I didn't feel the petitioner's lawyer was making a great case. What they have is a bunch of hyperbole and a little bit of possible planning.


"emptyg" I love it!
 
Last edited:
Well, "I'm not an insurrectionist, I'm a complete ******* crazy moron" is certainly plausible, I guess.

Doesn't really matter in the end, dangerous sociopath is dangerous sociopath.
 
"I don't recall" was one of the holy proclamations of Saint Reagan, so she's just following in his footsteps.


I realized that joke is getting dated, especially when she's more likely just following Trump's example of blatantly lying, assuming nobody will check, and denying reality when they do.
 
Armitage72 said:
"I don't recall" was one of the holy proclamations of Saint Reagan, so she's just following in his footsteps.


I realized that joke is getting dated, especially when she's more likely just following Trump's example of blatantly lying, assuming nobody will check, and denying reality when they do.
Click to expand...

Example? I think she's taking legal advice from him.
Next best thing to having a fool for a lawyer and all, you know.
'I say a lot of things, a whole lot of things, the best of things. I can't possibly be expected to remember all of them.', or something very much like that at least.
 
Last edited:
The issue is what she has said not what she remembers saying. Calling the Speaker of the House a traitor and calling for her execution. Claiming she doesn't remember saying it is no defense.

But this has also become a common tactic among Republicans. Making extreme statements and, when called to account, denying they ever said it even when video exists of them making the statement in question. They know their supporters will claim to believe them.
  • Do you believe Greene called Pelosi a traitor and suggested she be executed? :confused:
  • MAGAChud: She said she don't remember saying that. I don't think she said it. :mad:
  • Have you seen the video of her saying it to a crowd? :confused:
  • MAGAChud: Video don't prove nothing! :mad:
  • Do you think Pelosi should be executed? :confused:
  • MAGAChud: Is she a traitor? I think traitors should be executed, damn right! :mad:
Click to expand...
 
smartcooky said:
Yep.



Ultra-conservatives and far right scumbags (and in that I include about half of the House and Senate Republicans) would be perfectly happy to do away with the constitution and democracy altogether and instigate a white, one-party dictatorship, so long as it was THEIR party.
Click to expand...
Ummm.. why only half?

Remember, virtually all Republicans in Congress thought it was A-OK for Trump to blackmail a foreign government in order to help win the election during Trump's first impeachment. And almost all thought a violent terrorist attack on the capitol building wasn't worth impeaching Trump over either.

Sounds to me like the number of Republican congress-critters who are happy to do away with democracy is closer to 100% rather than half

Sent from my moto e using Tapatalk
 
newyorkguy said:
The issue is what she has said not what she remembers saying. Calling the Speaker of the House a traitor and calling for her execution. Claiming she doesn't remember saying it is no defense.

But this has also become a common tactic among Republicans. Making extreme statements and, when called to account, denying they ever said it even when video exists of them making the statement in question. They know their supporters will claim to believe them.
Click to expand...

Nobody believes it. Her supporters know she said it, they LIKE that she said it. They know she has to pretend not to have said it. Just how the game is played. For now.
 
gnome said:
Nobody believes it. Her supporters know she said it, they LIKE that she said it. They know she has to pretend not to have said it. Just how the game is played. For now.
Click to expand...
Sure, but I certainly hope there's a little difference between that and what you say in court. " Got to tell the truth in the booth, good people! '
 
Armitage72 said:
"I don't recall" was one of the holy proclamations of Saint Reagan, so she's just following in his footsteps.


I realized that joke is getting dated, especially when she's more likely just following Trump's example of blatantly lying, assuming nobody will check, and denying reality when they do.
Click to expand...

Indeed, its even true in fiction!

"I have no recollection of that! That's the term you have to learn"
-Robert Ritter to Jack Ryan (Clear and Present Danger)
 
Mike! said:
Example? I think she's taking legal advice from him.
Next best thing to having a fool for a lawyer and all, you know.
'I say a lot of things, a whole lot of things, the best of things. I can't possibly be expected to remember all of them but I have one of the great memories of all time,' or something very much like that at least.
Click to expand...

FTFY
 
Apparently, Perjury Taylor Greene doesn't know the difference between treason and violating an oath of office. You can be executed for the former but not the latter.

She's such a moron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom