Our Tesla Model 3 came with class W tires that can handle speeds of 168 mph. They were designed for performance rather than long life.
Alas, I almost never get to go 168 around here. I'd rather not have to spend every other weekend at the tire store.
While I think it likely that Tesla is making a good business decision making expensive luxury performance cars for people who can afford that kind of thing, I think electric cars for the masses will be slow catching on until they're not only cheaper to own in reality, but in perception.
My cheap little Hyundai gets close to 40 mpg throughout the year, and rough estimates put its annual fuel cost at about twice that of a comparable electric. About the only ICE-specific expense otherwise is around $30 every 7500 miles for oil changes. So let's say roughly that I spend about 1600 bucks a year on ICE-specific things.
Another rough calculation suggests I'd pay about half that for Electric power for a similar distance. That puts the electric at about a 700-800 per year advantage, but if tire life is halved, that gets dropped pretty fast at $400 or so a set, and brake life is also an issue, as is suspension, both in life and initial cost for heavier-duty parts. The current car is very easy on brakes, owing to its ridiculously light weight, and its suspension is cheap, light and durable. The rear drum brakes are good for pretty much the life of the car, and the fronts for 80 thousand miles or so. I had to replace a leaking rear shock at about 100 thousand miles, but the front struts are still fine. It's a cheap car to own, light and simple.
The estimated fuel cost could be deceptive, since this is Vermont, where many months are cold, requiring not only the heater but reducing battery efficiency. It's a gray area. The ICE engine also has reduced economy, but it goes from something around 41 mpg down to 38. Not enormous even at high gas prices.
We''re left with a likely saving in overall running cost for the electric vehicle, but not an enormous one, and that saving is hard to justify if the vehicle itself is much more expensive in electric form.
I have little doubt that as economies of scale keep changing, the balance will also change, but so far it's not quite compelling enough.