I can't figure out what the consensus here is - is it that the allegations against junior (acting as an agent for his dad's influence-peddling, crack addiction, whoring and pissing money away like it's 1999 etc') are exaggerated? Entirely fabricated? True but of no consequence/relevence, just the "frailties" and peccadiloes of a well-intentioned guy?
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
I can't even begin to imagine the kind of denial/cognitive dissonance required to hand-wave away the concern that the former VPOTUS and current POTUS might very well be seriously 'compromised'.
If you said, say, “Joe Biden has been engaged in illegal behaviour X and the laptop has information that demonstrates it” that would be one thing. If, for example illegal behaviour X was a specific crime.
If you feel that way about Biden, I can only imagine how upset you must feel about how compromised Trump was during his term.
This laptop story has been going on for years and yet what is supposed to make it interesting?
If you said, say, “Joe Biden has been engaged in illegal behaviour X and the laptop has information that demonstrates it” that would be one thing. If, for example illegal behaviour X was a specific crime.
But the way the story is being spun makes it sound like Hunter Biden owning a laptop itself is a serious crime and that it somehow means something very bad.
The story cannot be the laptop. So what is the story?
According to my reading there are two major issues that could be at play.
Did HB pay his taxes properly. Remember Trump said "That makes me smart."
The other issue is did HB act as a foreign agent without registering as one. Paul Manafort was convicted of that crime and Trump pardoned him.
-There is a Laptop which is in the possession of the FBI which probably belonged to Hunter Biden.
Is this the laptop with serial number FVFXC2MMHV29 that the DoJ signed a receipt for with the repair shop, the laptop that Hunter says was stolen by a Russian drug dealer while he was high in a honey trap with a Russian hooker that there is a video of him telling another prostitute about, the one he left with some psychiatrist who got raided by the DEA, or another laptop?There is no laptop.
Is this the laptop with serial number FVFXC2MMHV29 that the DoJ signed a receipt for with the repair shop, the laptop that Hunter says was stolen by a Russian drug dealer while he was high in a honey trap with a Russian hooker that there is a video of him telling another prostitute about, the one he left with some psychiatrist who got raided by the DEA, or another laptop?
But the link that was provided to some article "debunking" the laptop said that they had been able to validate lots of the data, it's synced from cloud email providers so showing it was altered would be easy. You've got recipients of the data validating it as well. You've got all the chat on there about Hunter complaining about having to share half his salary with his father, you've got the cuts of business deals for "the big guy". You've got hunter paying Joe's bills. You've got the secret service covering up the whole gun thing.It's the laptop that has not provided any evidence of Joe Biden doing anything illegal that the right-wingers are so desperately hoping for, largely to deflect from the Trump tax investigations and the Jan. 6th investigation.
What link is that?But the link that was provided to some article "debunking" the laptop said that they had been able to validate lots of the data, it's synced from cloud email providers so showing it was altered would be easy.