• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part V

IIRC (and I certainly can't be bothered to go back to look it up) he did link to reports of named people dying unexpectedly. Needless to say he provided no evidence whatsoever that these deaths were linked with the vaccine, nor that there have been any more such deaths since the vaccine was rolled out than prior to it, and ignored posts pointing this out.

Actually, I don't think he has named anyone that's died from tiny razor blades.
I've just done a search of this thread, and there was one video that talked about unexpected deaths among children- but no mention of tiny razor blades- and some quotes from the Qur'an. And that's it.
He's not even trying to support these claims. It's just snarky waffle.
 
Last weekend, I was at the airport, and went through the metal detector.
If I was full of tiny razor blades, I should have set off every alarm in the place. Instead, I walked straight through without so much as a beep.
I'm also lean.
Emre, have you considered the possibility that this claim is complete bollocks?
No, of course not. :rolleyes:

But that just proves that the razor blades are made of titanium, don't you see? It's why your weight hasn't shot up, what with being full of razor blades...
 

goodsciencing.com has possibly the worst grade that MediaBiasFactCheck can give:

MediaBiasFactCheck said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

Overall, we rate Real Science (goodsciencing.com) right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, propaganda, failed fact checks, and a complete lack of transparency.

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Sadly, it's not surprising you quote them as a source.
 
I just saw a website (sorry, no link, site tossed unheralded) that contended that the vaccines (so called vaccines in scare quotes of course) are 99 percent graphene. I guess that explains why my last booster was done with a hammer. But it's very handy, because now I have only to come close to an electrical outlet and I strike an arc that lights up the whole room. Heeding the sage warnings seen above I am going to take the money I save on flashlight batteries and spend it all on hookers and blow scantily clad nymphs while there's still time.
 
I just saw a website (sorry, no link, site tossed unheralded) that contended that the vaccines (so called vaccines in scare quotes of course) are 99 percent graphene. I guess that explains why my last booster was done with a hammer. But it's very handy, because now I have only to come close to an electrical outlet and I strike an arc that lights up the whole room. Heeding the sage warnings seen above I am going to take the money I save on flashlight batteries and spend it all on hookers and blow scantily clad nymphs while there's still time.

So we can successfully vaccinate ourselves with pencil lead? Wutta timesaver.
 
I just saw a website (sorry, no link, site tossed unheralded) that contended that the vaccines (so called vaccines in scare quotes of course) are 99 percent graphene. I guess that explains why my last booster was done with a hammer. But it's very handy, because now I have only to come close to an electrical outlet and I strike an arc that lights up the whole room. Heeding the sage warnings seen above I am going to take the money I save on flashlight batteries and spend it all on hookers and blow scantily clad nymphs while there's still time.

99% graphene? That doesn't leave much room for the UFOs, the DNA changing gene therapies, the tiny tentacled aliens and the nanochips, does it?
 
No coincidence that it's really easy to pretend you're injecting lead with one of those propelling pencils

Hah, I have a piece of pencil lead in the palm of my hand lodge there since 5th grade - I am super protected already!
 
goodsciencing.com has possibly the worst grade that MediaBiasFactCheck can give:



Sadly, it's not surprising you quote them as a source.

It's not surprising, because it seems that failing a fact-check and being given a low rating on fact-checking sites is actually a kind of badge of honour in conspiracy circles.
It's a weird, topsy-turvy way of thinking, that says that it's not wrong, it's just that "they"- or (((they)))- are trying to suppress "the truth".
It's also a lazy way to avoid having to address the rebuttals in any kind of depth.
 

Back
Top Bottom