acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 40,914
Germany confiscated a $0.6 billion Yacht of an oligarchs.
I
Yeah, the Dilbar. 512 feet long. https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacom...-alisher-usmanovs-mega-yacht/?sh=5c7bf6a352dd
Germany confiscated a $0.6 billion Yacht of an oligarchs.
I
Some interesting speculation on Russian maintenance in this thread:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1499164245250002944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1499164245250002944%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redditmedia.com%2Fmediaembed%2Fliveupdate%2F18hnzysb1elcs%2FLiveUpdate_891df1d4-9a8c-11ec-ab5e-92be2145d5a0%2F0
Russian will turn into North Korea after this...
What harm is it doing (other than to the Russian people themselves)?Because many people view it? That's an... odd takeaway. Because the magnitude of harm being done makes it worthy of pointedly dealing with would be a much more obvious takeaway, with a side of any background manipulation being done to misrepresent reality should be addressed.
RT America is every 24-hour news channel you’ve ever watched remembered in a fever dream. Uncanny and off and slightly cheaper, some parallel world where [Dennis] Miller and [William] Shatner are still big stars. And, most eerily, a world where you can talk about Russian foreign policy… and barely ever mention Putin.
I don't think so. Russia has a sizable middle class. It's too integrated into the world economy. The question is how will they react after seeing their life's savings disappear? This is not going to be good on the rest of the world. But the impact on Russia is going to be really ugly.
Sorry, but I think you should have noticed that English doesn't distinguish between personal and royal you. First line was clearly about German response, not your own personal,while later I did address your posts.Oh come one! You literally wrote "You ... Germany", and made me out to be responsible for what Germany is doing or not doing.
Which is the same kind of mistake that lies at the heart of things like racism: Making an individual responsible for perceived failings of a group (s)he is born into.
You didn't actually answer the question.
No, that's not true. Putin wants to "denazify" (sic) and "demilitarize" (sic) Ukraine:
(https://www.npr.org/2022/03/01/1083677765/putin-denazify-ukraine-russia-history?t=1646240036186).
I don't think this is acceptable. Ukraine voted to become independent from the Soviet Union in 1991 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Ukrainian_independence_referendum). I see no reason why this wish to be independent shouldn't be respected by Russia. If there is something to "denazify" or to "demilitarize" in Ukraine, this should be done by the Ukrainians themselves, not by Moscow.
I find the model more plausible that he has cut himself off of reliable, truthful, 360 °C all around information and instead placed himself in an echo bubble, where all he hears is echos of his own lies, which he has come to believe. Bad decisions follow from bad information.
We characterize the contemporary Russian model for propaganda as “the firehose of falsehood” because of two of its distinctive features: high numbers of channels and messages and a shameless willingness to disseminate partial truths or outright fictions. In the words of one observer, “[N]ew Russian propaganda entertains, confuses and overwhelms the audience.”2
Contemporary Russian propaganda has at least two other distinctive features. It is also rapid, continuous, and repetitive, and it lacks commitment to consistency.
Interestingly, several of these features run directly counter to the conventional wisdom on effective influence and communication from government or defense sources, which traditionally emphasize the importance of truth, credibility, and the avoidance of contradiction.3 Despite ignoring these traditional principles, Russia seems to have enjoyed some success under its contemporary propaganda model, either through more direct persuasion and influence or by engaging in obfuscation, confusion, and the disruption or diminution of truthful reporting and messaging.
What harm is it doing (other than to the Russian people themselves)?
The same arguments can be made against the Western media which is owned by wealthy corporate barons (eg Fox or Murdoch) and have a heavy pro-conservative bias. Obviously I am going to believe in Western media reports about the war long before I believe in a single word from RT but there is no denying the harm Western media does - especially the way they villainize all forms of social programs in favour of unfettered capitalism.
The list of companies cutting ties with Russia gets longer and longer, what will the nomenklatura do when they can no longer get their favourite foreign brands?
Russian jets violated Swedish air space but withdrew after Swedish jets scrambled to intercept them.
I was afraid Putin would start playing these games.
Would not be surprised if a US Warship being buzzed by a Russian jet is next.
Early in the thread I brought up the old "Radio Free Europe" ads I would see and hear on TV and radio and wondered if/why such a thing couldn't be done today. Cool to know it can and is.
The list of companies cutting ties with Russia gets longer and longer, what will the nomenklatura do when they can no longergetsell their favourite foreign brands?
Yep, just a lousy "peace front" type over here, quaking in my boots. I'd be a hippy, too, if I could remember where my bong was at, man.
So anyway, what do you suggest then?
A group of 11 Labour MPs from the left of the party have removed their names from a statement about the invasion of*Ukraine, which heavily criticises Nato after being warned they risked losing the party whip.
In a rapid victory for Keir Starmer over MPs still linked to Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour chief whip wrote to the 11 backbenchers asking them to remove their signatures from*a statement drawn up*by the Stop the War group.
...
The Stop the War statement, which accuses the UK government of “sabre-rattling” over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, also criticises it for saying Ukraine has a right to join Nato if it wishes.
It says the alliance “should call a halt to its eastward expansion and commit to a new security deal for*Europe*which meets the needs of all states and peoples,” adding: “We refute the idea that Nato is a defensive alliance, and believe its record in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia and Libya over the last generation, not to mention the US-British attack on Iraq, clearly proves otherwise.”