How odd, because you claimed that...Quantum science is a beautiful window to understand problems that can not be proven in the laboratory. Can the science of natural physics justify the laws of quantum physics? No.
Hi
I did some research in the lab to prove the supernatural and I am attaching a written article Please read and comment I answered
I'm not sure what you're asking, or why it's relevant.
Conscious entities make choices, and they usually have a reason for those choices. People, and to a varying degree many other animals, are conscious entities which make choices for reasons. There are almost certainly complex lifeforms which have evolved on other worlds which are also conscious entities.
Nature is not a conscious entity. It's a set of laws. The words 'choice' and 'reason' do not apply to those laws. Gravity, natural selection, radioactive decay ... these are not conscious processes. They are not guided or planned. They just happen, as described by the laws that govern their behaviour.
Hello
A photon is the smallest structure in the universe. By what mechanism did Photon overcome time in Professor Suarez's experiment ?! And both photons reached the target at different speeds at the same time? !! Isn't that really amazing ?! By what mechanism was the photon able to stop time from reaching the end point at the same time with another photon at the same speed and starting point? What is the consciousness of a photon? Please read Suarez's test thoroughly. It is incredibly amazing.
Thanks
I have no idea what you are referring to, heydarian.
If you want to discuss a specific experiment, please provide a link.
Regardless of our philosophical differences, on this I'm sure we can all agree. Amen, Brother.Hello to all dear teammates I am very sorry about Russia's war with Ukraine. I hope this fire of war will end as soon as possible. My condolences to all dear Ukrainian citizens. And I wish them all good health.
Bold assertion without proof. Until you can prove this to everyone's satisfaction, there is no point in going further.-I do not agree with you in this paragraph. The Qur'an was not recited by ancient humans.The Qur'an is a message sent from God to human beings.
I recommend you visit the Suarez Academy website. There are several articles that I have mentioned in this section. Among other things, Suarez stated:
"There is a strong invisible consciousness behind quantum telepathy."
Also tested of The limits of quantum superposition: Should "Schrödinger's cat" and "Wigner's friend" be considered "miracle" narratives? Suarez says: This experiment explains that this is beyond the realm of science.
The following site contains some of Suarez's scientific articles. The content of this message and the previous message are also on the same site :
https://independent.academia.edu/AntoineSuarez1
Thank you
Lots of religious apologists have tried to use quantum theory to justify their religious beliefs; their arguments are, to put it mildly, less than compelling. A quick google of this physicist suggests that he has nothing original, or of particular interest, to add to this discussion.
None of the mainstream interpretations of quantum theory require or support theism at all, let alone the kind of personal/interventionist God you believe in.
God isn't real. He just isn't.
Regardless of our philosophical differences, on this I'm sure we can all agree. Amen, Brother.
Bold assertion without proof. Until you can prove this to everyone's satisfaction, there is no point in going further.
We know what you believe Heydarian. We want you to demonstrate it's true with actual evidence not vague handwaving and logical fallacies.
You are still not understanding my argument, heydarian. The exception you make is to the statement "Everything has a cause". You make a single exception for God. I'm saying it's more parsimonious to make an exception for the universe.Dear Pixel
- We who believe in God do not attribute any cause to God in the line of material causes. God is the ultimate cause. All causes and events return to him. God's relationship is the same for all reasons. It is not the case that we relate some causes to matter. And some to God. No. All causes are related to God. We do not make an exception. Of course, as we have said, God is the supreme cause. Not parallel to material causes.
There is no good reason to assume the existence of a God. None. Nothing is explained that cannot be explained without that assumption. Statements like "God is not of the material world" are irrelevant. It makes no difference what form you imagine your God to take. It is simply unnecessary.- God is not of the material world to place him in the order of matter and the hierarchy of material cause. This is the main mistake of you disbelievers and skeptics. Please think about this important issue
Science actually has several possible answers.Our final question is, what is "single cause"? Hawking said: he created himself !! What is its mechanism? Could not answer. Science has not yet been able to answer this question.
Again, science has several possible answers.- We fully accept the evolutionary chain. And it's completely scientific. And we have no doubt about that. Our question is, "By what mechanism did inanimate matter come to life?" Science has not yet given an answer. We are waiting for science to answer. Can you answer? say.
No. Postulating a God does not answer your questions, it simply replaces them with even more difficult questions about the nature and origin of God.God Almighty has answered these two questions.
That is not what is meant by a personal God. A personal God is a God who behaves like a person, i.e. is a conscious entity who makes choices etc. As opposed to the kind of vague, impersonal force that many theists believe in.God. He is not my personal god. He is the God of the universe and everything in it.
A personal god, or personal goddess, is a deity who can be related to as a person,[1] instead of as an impersonal force, such as the Absolute, "the All", or the "Ground of Being".
In the scriptures of the Abrahamic religions, God is described as being a personal creator, speaking in the first person and showing emotion such as anger and pride, and sometimes appearing in anthropomorphic shape.[2] In the Pentateuch, for example, God talks with and instructs his prophets and is conceived as possessing volition, emotions (such as anger, grief and happiness), intention, and other attributes characteristic of a human person. Personal relationships with God may be described in the same ways as human relationships, such as a Father, as in Christianity, or a Friend as in Sufism.[3]
A 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center reported that, of U.S. adults, 70% view that "God is a person with whom people can have a relationship," while 15% believe that "God is an impersonal force."[4] A 2019 survey by the National Opinion Research Center reports that 77.5% of U.S. adults believe in a personal god.[5] The 2014 Religious Landscape survey conducted by Pew reported that 77% of U.S. adults believe in a personal god.[6]