• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Cancel culture IRL Part 2

d4m10n, can we get your take on the ethics of what Carano is doing?
She's in the wrong, obviously.

Would you call for her to stop being featured as a actress for being wrong about things unrelated to being an actress?

(If so, there should be a phrase for that.)
 
Last edited:
No, see, Joe, he’s not calling you hypocritical, he’s accusing you of the fallacy of trying to point out hypocrisy. Oh no wait, accusing mr. karate, not you. My bad.
 
Last edited:
Laws regarding criminal behavior were in place before the behavior took place; so were the penalties. In addition, mixing up two person's names, for example, is not outlandish. If you were trying to write a comment that was a failure in all respects, you succeeded.

He did it multiple times. :rolleyes: I can't force you to read the links in this thread but you should do it, it helps you form a coherent argument. I won't comment on your other two posts since they are essentially just whining...
 
If the system had actually worked, the UIC administration would have told the students that firing Professor Kilborn was contrary to the law and second that the question in the context of his class was apppropriate.

The sane way for the question: Several racial slurs were used

The "conservative" Chris H. way: Using ****** and bitch is appropriate and could not have been done in any other way.
 
Last edited:
She's in the wrong, obviously.

Would you call for her to stop being featured as a actress for being wrong about things unrelated to being an actress?

(If so, there should be a phrase for that.)

I'm banging your wife, why won't you let me clean your pool?

You're an adult. This is not complicated. You pretending it is for two threads is just embarassing.
 
The sane way for the question: Several racial slurs were used

The "conservative" Chris H. way: Using ****** and bitch is appropriate and could not have been done in any other way.

You redacted one more letter than the professor did for the first word and four fewer than the professor did for the second word.
 
To be clear, are you comparing Carano's verbal offenses to adultery? It must be awful for words to hurt that much.

What he means is: She **** the bed in a hotel so she should not be allowed to have a room in this hotel.
Of course you disagree, probably because you like soiled beds but the descision was still Disney's no matter how much you would like to put the blame on some unwashed leftists who extorted Disney into Gina's firing...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I'm banging your wife, why won't you let me clean your pool?

You're an adult. This is not complicated. You pretending it is for two threads is just embarassing.

It's even more absurd than that, because carefully managing public perception is as much a part of a actor's job as anything else. There's a whole thriving industry of journalism (if you can call it that) dedicated to covering the off-screen lives of major actors.

Being generally "likeable" is absolutely a relevant job requirement for working on Disney's massively expensive and popular Star Wars IP. Being a right wing conspiracy crank who's on the express lane to "naming the Jew" is obviously a firing offense. The best paid actors aren't making the big bucks solely on their ability to act. Everyone understands this.

The parasocial relationship between actors and the audience is absolutely a part of the job, especially when you deal with a IP with such a devoted and deranged fanbase.

Your pool cleaner analogy is still correct, but it doesn't even need to apply in this case where not being an inflammatory contrarian is absolutely a job expectation for Carano, which Disney made explicit before firing her.
 
Last edited:
Ok, what's your point?

That the case I could make for you using disrespectful terms would have similar strength to the case the students have made for Kilborn using disrespectful terms right down to the circumstances (a contextual quotation of someone else using disrespectful terms).

I think you’ve grabbed me by the wrong end, anyway. I wrote post http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13745576&postcount=1323 to try to clear that up, did you have any thoughts on it?
 
That the case I could make for you using disrespectful terms would have similar strength to the case the students have made for Kilborn using disrespectful terms right down to the circumstances (a contextual quotation of someone else using disrespectful terms).

I think you’ve grabbed me by the wrong end, anyway. I wrote post http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13745576&postcount=1323 to try to clear that up, did you have any thoughts on it?

Still don't see a point at all...Anywhere you explicitly use the words "******" and "bitch" you could also say "Racial slurs and insults were uttered". But the guy chose the former and here we are.
 
Last edited:
What he means is: She **** the bed in a hotel so she should not be allowed to have a room in this hotel.
Now that you mention it, talking like a conservative is a lot like ******** in bed, and having an acting career is a lot like booking a hotel room.

Good analogy, 8/10, highly persuasive.
 
Last edited:
Still don't see a point at all...Anywhere you explicitly use the words "******" and "bitch" you could also say "Racial slurs and insults were uttered". But the guy chose the former and here we are.

What? I don’t understand how you could get that and not get my point? Oh well.
 
Is this why the trolls on the Right keep trying to make us give a **** that like the Capital Rioters or the 3 men who gunned down Arbery would sometimes loan their neighbor a cup of sugar or was youth church pastor or whatever?

"Well what about all the times I'm not doing a horrible, inexcusable thing?"
 
Now that you mention it, talking like a conservative is a lot like ******** in bed, and having an acting career is a lot like booking a hotel room.

Good analogy, 8/10, highly persuasive.

You replied to my post? But thanks for confirming that making outlandish holocaust comparisons is "talking like a conservative". You are slowly making progress.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom