Is there a chance at all that Belarus is there to help Ukraine, rather than join the invasion?
It really makes me pessimistic about how safe mutually assured destruction really is. At the end of the day, these nuclear armed countries aren't perfectly rational, carefully calculating actors. They can make huge mistakes and act on non-rational instincts, as shown by this full scale invasion by Putin. All it takes is for someone to back themselves into a corner and decide nuking is the only way out.
It is indeed a desperate, even pathetic, hope that Russia would stand alone in its madness.
I mentioned this movie a lot but there's a scene in the Cold War docu-drama 13 Days about the Cuban Missile Crisis.
President Kennedy: Dean, how does this all play out?
Dean Acheson: Your first step Sir, will be to demand that the Soviets withdraw the missiles within 12 to 24 hours. They will refuse. When they do you will order the strikes, followed by the invasion [of Cuba]. They will resist and be overrun. They will retaliate against another target somewhere else in the world, most likely Berlin. We will honor our treaty commitments and resist them there, defeating them per our plans.
President Kennedy: Those plans call for the use of nuclear weapons.
Dean Acheson: *Says nothing.*
President Kennedy: What's the next step?
Dean Acheson: Hopefully cooler heads will prevail before the next step.
*Later in private, President Kennedy talks to his brother Bobby and Special Assistant to the President Ken O'Donnell*
Ken O'Donnell: Yah know call me Irish but I don't believe in cooler heads prevailing.
Well if that's true, well done Russia! You've just essentially declared war on a nuclear power.
The very bestpeopletroops.
MAD indeed. It absolutely relies on the Russians believing that the West will be crazy and suicidal enough to retaliate with nuclear weapons and vice versa... Not very flattering about the humanity but it has at least worked - so far.
It stops working the moment either side says, by word or deed, admission or omission, "I might be crazy, but I'm not that crazy."
Well yeah but it's the Mexican standoff problem. Realizing the situation is untenable only makes a difference if you realize before you are in it. Realizing "Okay this isn't gonna work" once you are it is a philosophical question with little practical value.
You can't be the first one to put your gun down after the Mexican standoff starts.
I would argue we're not "in it" yet. At least, not fully committed. As of yet the US or other NATO countries are not in direct conflict with Russia.
Yeah but then why did Russia wait to ask them to join?
If Belarus had been part of the initial invasion force the planned "Get it over with quick" thing would have been more likely, Russia could have pretended they had "international support" and if any thing "ungentlemanly" happens they could have just blame the Belarus soldiers.
Maybe Putin was worried Belarus would go off message and start committing obvious atrocities out in the open for the world to see. Or maybe he suspected Belarussian performance would be so comically inept and ineffective that it would be a net propaganda and morale loss. Now that the Russian troops are delivering that loss anyway, maybe having more boots on the ground doesn't seem like such a bad idea even if they are no-talent assclowns.
I am betting a lot of US Special Forces ..the Green Berets are taking crash courses in Ukrainian....
Well if that's true, well done Russia! You've just essentially declared war on a nuclear power.
If this is True, some Russian troops in Syria might well be getting a little visit from Isralei Special Operations units....