I had to drop out and just dropped back in but I seem to remember I asked a question of you Cosmic Yak that I didn't receive an answer to - I might have missed it - but in case not I'll ask again.
If the pandemic is a scam as a minority claim then signs of the scam should be apparent right from the start. My study of psyops shows that, generally, the scam will be a complete hoax, all made up, not a mix of real and fake, except where its suits and from the outset I couldn't see any reason at all why they'd want a real virus as part of the psyop - you cannot control a virus and the reality of trying to use a real virus would totally get in the way. Moreover, they really like to put the HOAX in hoax and really have a laugh at us by pushing their fakery right in our faces, it's not about replicating reality or simulating it as much as possible, that's not how they do it - with psyop propaganda, humiliation with nonsense is the name of the game. I mean, they only needed a couple of planes into the twin towers for their terror story (impossible of itself according to air defence protocol and a few other things) but no - no, no, no - they had their band of boxcutter-armed hijackers in their passenger airliner plough into Defence HQ. Yes, Defence HQ! Imagine that!
By rights, there should have been red faces, no? By rights, the US government should have been attacked by their critics and certainly taxpayers should have been asking a few questions about how, supposedly, the best defended airspace in the world turned out to be, in fact, completely vulnerable. How did this happen? Congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney did ask after all. She did ask. She asked in Congress:
https://youtu.be/NcEUnDTOj_g?t=1557
Did the four war games happening on the morning of 9/11 impair the military’s ability to respond to the attacks?” Her question was responded to by General Richard Myers, Acting Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff on 9/11, as follows:
“The answer to the question is no, it did not impair our response, in fact General Eberhart who was in the command of the North American Aerospace Defense Command as he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission I believe … I believe he told them that it enhanced our ability to respond, given that NORAD didn’t have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day, that was an FAA responsibility. But there were two CPXs [Command Post Exercises]; there was one Department of Justice exercise that didn’t have anything to do with the other three and there was an actual operation ongoing because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska.”
If you believe that ...
I digress. So my question is, Cosmic Yak, where do you disagree with my claim that what is put forward for suspicion of a "novel" virus is completely unscientific?
Suspicion of a "novel" virus is based on an alleged "cluster" of 44 cases of pneumonia of "unknown origin" in the highly-polluted city of Wuhan.
A "cluster" is presumably identified by the fact of "unknown origin", however, pneumonia is not thought to have a "known origin" particularly so "unknown origin" makes no sense. 44 cases in a highly-polluted city doesn't make a cluster in the first place but if a cluster were to be determined on the basis of 44 cases then surely there would be specific symptoms that identified it, not the claim of "unknown origin".
Then, if indeed these 44 cases of pneumonia were caused by a novel virus why is the association between pneumonia and the novel virus now completely lost?
https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON229
Where is the "science" in this suspicion? Pray, do tell.
