Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, that is why I wrote, "in all manner of people", but it is always good to keep emphasizing that. Thank you.
Just expounding on your theme; no slight intended.
 
Last edited:
Is the emergencies act equivalent to martial law though? Will arrested Canadian truckers be tried by military tribunals or civilian courts? Or just get hugs and handshakes from the local police?
 
Nothing to verify.
You don't think a claim that an organisation which meets publicly with a published agenda and many published reports has "a long planned agenda of a group of ultra rich people and their financial mafia based in The City Of London and on Wall Street, to use a pseudo pandemic as a guise behind which, while our attention is on the pandemic, they want to complete their decades long efforts to gain full and complete control over all of us" is a claim that requires verification? You're just going to accept it unquestioningly? Seriously?

Trump attending WEF?.....Why even mention it....are you, (like Hillary) claiming he is a controlled opposition agent.?
I'm just pointing out that if the claim is true (which of course anyone with two brain cells to rub together can easily discover it isn't) then at least one person you profess to admire is likely to be one of the conspirators. I thought this might give you slight pause before swallowing this particular serving of BS whole. Clearly I gave you too much credit.
 
Justin Trudeau on Monday invoked the Emergencies Act to suspend civil rights and impose a state of martial law due to the Freedom Convoy protests. The Canadian Prime Minister made the announcement on Monday.



The Fallout from Trudeau’s Declaration of Martial Law Begins: Police Chiefs Begin to Resign in Protest
It does seem to me to be a bit premature (and thereby likely unnecessary) for the Act to be invoked, but it is by no means "martial law". If you think otherwise, it is because you do not know what martial law is.

Also, why are you referencing an article that misleads in its very title? Its headline is, "The Fallout from Trudeau’s Declaration of Martial Law Begins: Police Chiefs Begin to Resign in Protest". Yet the article only mentions ONE police chief who resigned, and provided no confirmation for the reason from that chief himself - just speculation. A critical thinker notices these unprofessional and manipulative practices, and if they still decide to use that source, they would provide explanations as to why such aberrations could be ignored. You haven't done so, and I suspect you cannot. I am also waiting for your answers to my last post.
 
You don't think a claim that an organisation which meets publicly with a published agenda and many published... reports




There it is.

You trust them.

All your life, their (owned) legacy media has trained you to trust them.

Same here , but not any more. They lie (proven) too much
 
There it is.

You trust them.
Not even as far as I can throw them.

I just trust your BS sources even less.

So I look for evidence of all such claims. I don't accept them unquestioningly, even if it makes me feel superior to the "sheeple" to think I know something they don't.

All your life, their (owned) legacy media has trained you to trust them.

Same here , but not any more. They lie (proven) too much
Your sources have been proven to lie all the time. So why do you trust them? Why do you trust this one, specifically?
 
Who would ever have thought that the voices presented to us all our lives by The TV News as reliable and trusted authorities, every night, by 'trusted' MSM 'journalists' would actually be part of an underlying hidden decades long agenda.?

Decades back,some of them actually were journalists (and actual investigative journalists). It changed. (Example, why Moyers quit PBS. Vaunted Gergen of PBS News was caught denying lying about his participation at elitist Bohemian Grove. Look up Nixon's comments on Bohemian Grove.

Today, the 'journalists' mostly are mere leftist activists, and to a lesser extent rightist activists. MSM are most or all leftist/progressives.

This applies 100% to all controlled perceptions and views in this thread.
 
Not even as far as I can throw them.

I just trust your BS sources even less.

So I look for evidence of all such claims. I don't accept them unquestioningly, even if it makes me feel superior to the "sheeple" to think I know something they don't.


Rhetoric set aside.


Your sources have been proven to lie all the time. So why do you trust them? Why do you trust this one, specifically?


Going there is the typical dodge cop out when it comes to denial of parroted lies, from the vaunted ever trusted legacy media which you've been conditioned to trust since age what, eight or so.

I did too, until I saw the lies.

Instead of defending your msm, you and the other pseudo skeptics here usually respond by pitting your vaunted corrupt msm with newer (sometimes unreliable) alternative sources.

The fact y'all do so is an admission you cannot defend proven lies by those msm sources you keep trusting after proven to be liars...that is a sign of insanity, BTW....trusting proven liars. Fits well in Mass Formation Psychosis syndrome. Get help, please.


Did your Mom train you trust the BBC?


Sure, some so called conspiracy sources are unreliable nuts. Idiots love to unfairly claim we swallow all of it.

So why do you and your ilkies always shoot at that low hanging alternative fruit, instead of honestly addressing proven lies told by your msm cult leaders?

Continuing to trust them, and refusing to look really is the main issue IMO. (ex. msm lies/omission re Hunter, Hillary)
 
Last edited:
Who would ever have thought that the voices presented to us all our lives by The TV News as reliable and trusted authorities, every night, by 'trusted' MSM 'journalists' would actually be part of an underlying hidden decades long agenda.?

Gullible, uninformed idiots, apparently.
 
Why do you trust this one, specifically?

"This one".? ...If you're referring to the Grand Jury opening statements by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, you're referring to the view of thousands of professionals and others who would agree that your Mom may have meant well, but steered you wrong if she taught you to trust authority.
 
Sure, some so called conspiracy sources are unreliable nuts.
That's why we need to question and verify every source. Including (especially, in fact) the ones telling us what we would like to believe. So why are you not even attempting to question and verify the source whose BS you are currently spewing onto this thread?

So why do you and your ilk always shoot at the low hanging fruit, instead of addressing proven lies told by your cult leaders?
This thread, and many others, are full of posts addressing lies, including the unproven accusations to which you are referring.
 
Some of the Canadian truckers sure behaved like terrorists

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Alberta said it had arrested 11 people and seized 13 long guns, as well as handguns and a large quantity of ammunition.

Those arrested were reported to have a "willingness to use force against the police if any attempts were made to disrupt the blockade", the force said.


ETA:

It does seem to me to be a bit premature (and thereby likely unnecessary) for the Act to be invoked, but it is by no means "martial law". If you think otherwise, it is because you do not know what martial law is.

If there was intelligence about more potential terrorism by them, I guess that could be the reasoning.
 
Last edited:
That's why we need to question and verify every source. Including (especially, in fact) the ones telling us what we would like to believe. So why are you not even attempting to question and verify the source whose BS you are currently spewing onto this thread?


This thread, and many others, are full of posts addressing lies, including the unproven accusations to which you are referring.


Whats your example of the worst agenda that bad people with mind and means have intended and or accomplished against humans.? Who were they? Who would you think they are today? H ave you considered that?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom