• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

DIY experiment proving graviton is a particle

philippeb8 said:
Just 1 century, not many. "Science" was extremely productive before the Nobel Prize and Einstein's spacetime curvature nonsense.

They have failed to silence me on time because everything is public now. Maybe that's because the Truck Convoy here in Canada has higher priority so that would suggest I've got the perfect timing.

On a final note, a have proven the Nobel / Breakthrough Prizes are actually counterproductive and slow human evolution down because of the following relation:
mainstream^5 * n_phd * n_np * n_bp

Where:
n_phd = number of new physics PhD per year
n_np = number of years since the dawn of the Nobel Prize
n_bp = number of years since the dawn of the Breakthrough Prize

Now in 2022 it's mathematically impossible to undo that mess and not worth the efforts.

I have also mathematically proven the sole purpose of the Kavli / Perimeter Institutes, the Snolab, Xenon lab, ... is to increase our deficit to benefit the Central Banks slowly but surely.
Click to expand...

You think science hasn't been 'productive' since 1895?
 
Steve said:
In an infinite multiverse with infinite possibilities there is a universe chock full of gravitons where phillipeb8 has made his breakthrough and is sitting and laughing at us from atop his pile of $trillions. This will not be that universe.
Click to expand...
Though it'd be a universe where gravity worked rather differently.
 
philippeb8 said:
By saying you and I aren't smart enough to understand my own manuscript you just proved whatever I say then you will say the exact opposite.

That means if you say Finite Theory is a crackpot effort that really means it's an absolute masterpiece. You are also confirming the defamation agenda you are following to the letter. So thanks again.
Click to expand...
Yours is not the only possible interpretation of the facts.
 
philippeb8 said:
On a final note, a have proven the Nobel / Breakthrough Prizes are actually counterproductive and slow human evolution down because of the following relation:

mainstream^5 * n_phd * n_np * n_bp

Where:
n_phd = number of new physics PhD per year
n_np = number of years since the dawn of the Nobel Prize
n_bp = number of years since the dawn of the Breakthrough Prize
Click to expand...


This is not a relation. It does not show an equality or any other relationship between anything and anything else. It's only some various quantities multiplied together. One of those quantities, "mainstream," is undefined and lacks units.
 
philippeb8 said:
Do your own research.

Alfred Nobel was dubbed the "Angel of Death". Do you seriously I want to be associated with him or any "destructive science" after I keep bragging about my specific "constructive science" efforts?

Also even the Vatican is associated with the Central Banks / Freemasonry since 1832. All they do is flip around the values of the Vatican like the 7 virtues to the 7 deadly sins. And the Nobel Prize represents all that (reputation / pride) which is leading to our own demise.

Thus I reject any association with them.
Click to expand...

How does any of that answer my question about the productivity of science over the last 100 years?
 
philippeb8 said:
You missed the part where it got simplified with a 5 minutes long search engine search + 67 lines long Python script.
Click to expand...

That was for your proof of an "aether wind". Are you now claiming it was for proof of gravitons, too?

Either way, you haven't presented any proof, per se...just an empty claim. Now would be a great time to show what you have.
 
jsfisher said:
That was for your proof of an "aether wind". Are you now claiming it was for proof of gravitons, too?

Either way, you haven't presented any proof, per se...just an empty claim. Now would be a great time to show what you have.
Click to expand...

Actually it also proves that there is graviton attenuation down to 80% but I'll have to run the same script on a larger data set to verify its consistency.
 
Last edited:
Please confine posts to the thread topic
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: sarge
 
philippeb8 said:
Actually it also proves that there is graviton attenuation down to 80% but I'll have to run the same script on a larger data set to verify its consistency.
Click to expand...

And I look forward to your Tractor Beams, Anti-Gravity Devices, Force Fields, and other such 'Star Trek' type things that you say that you will be producing.
 
philippeb8 said:
jsfisher said:
That was for your proof of an "aether wind". Are you now claiming it was for proof of gravitons, too?

Either way, you haven't presented any proof, per se...just an empty claim. Now would be a great time to show what you have.
Click to expand...

Actually it also proves that there is graviton attenuation down to 80% but I'll have to run the same script on a larger data set to verify its consistency.
Click to expand...

You continue to avoid providing any sort of proof of your claims. What was your Google search, and the Python script you applied to it, and what was the results you obtained? I am not simply interested in what you think the results mean; I and others (I am sure) would like to see the raw information from which you drew your conclusions.
 
Norman Alexander said:
Show your work. Let's see the script and the data set, and explain how your got the data set too.
Click to expand...

For a person who claims to make all his knowledge public, as per the quote below, philippeb8 seems strangely reluctant to make his knowledge public.


philippeb8 said:
They are not powerless, they are currently taxing me to death but making all my knowledge public and refuting the spacetime curvature nonsense within a week or two is an efficient counter-strategy.

I know this forum will be archived, so I want to be remembered as being part of the solution.
Click to expand...
 
jsfisher said:
You continue to avoid providing any sort of proof of your claims. What was your Google search, and the Python script you applied to it, and what was the results you obtained? I am not simply interested in what you think the results mean; I and others (I am sure) would like to see the raw information from which you drew your conclusions.
Click to expand...

I'll post the link one more time but if I see you guys intentionally confuse everything I say then I'll leave for good. Because if I stay here that means I contribute to your ATMer defamation agenda, despite taking the time to warn you everything is clear to me.

Here's the data and the script:
https://github.com/philippeb8/microgal

The images are based on the following experiment:
http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/article/2015/cpb_24_5_050401/cpb150398f8_hr.png.html

And Fig S5 below confirms other experiments all return similar sinusoidal residuals:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.09084.pdf

The sinusoidal residual means that at 6 pm and 6 am, when the gravimeter is perfectly perpendicular to the Sun, it measures the highest discrepancy between what is predicted and what is measured. And this is very consistent.

The graviton attenuation is the ratio of the measured residual at 12 am and 12 pm which gets us 80%. But again, this will need to be confirmed with a larger data set.
 
Last edited:
And yet, despite not taking your brilliance into account, we can get spaceships to land exactly where we want, even after they take slingshots around Jupiter.

In your universe Jupiter would massively interfere with the Sun's gravitons and thus the path of a spaceship would differ from one that does not take that into account.

The difference may be small, but space is big, so it would be enough to make things completely miss their intended targets.

They don't. So the odds of you being right are quite small.
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
And yet, despite not taking your brilliance into account, we can get spaceships to land exactly where we want, even after they take slingshots around Jupiter.

In your universe Jupiter would massively interfere with the Sun's gravitons and thus the path of a spaceship would differ from one that does not take that into account.

The difference may be small, but space is big, so it would be enough to make things completely miss their intended targets.

They don't. So the odds of you being right are quite small.
Click to expand...

A slingshot is lateral to the associated planet:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_assist
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
And yet, despite not taking your brilliance into account, we can get spaceships to land exactly where we want, even after they take slingshots around Jupiter.

In your universe Jupiter would massively interfere with the Sun's gravitons and thus the path of a spaceship would differ from one that does not take that into account.

The difference may be small, but space is big, so it would be enough to make things completely miss their intended targets.

They don't. So the odds of you being right are quite small.
Click to expand...

What about all of those?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom