• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
This sorta conflicts with what I've been telling John Hopkins, for months now, which I suggested they study.

Finally... the cool John Hopkins guys & gals took my advice. They just published their findings.

Excerpt from a phone call I got from Suzie, (she and I have been chatting on phone for months now) at John Hopkins:


[/I]

(Their report says lockdowns in Europe and the United States reduced covid mortality by only 0.2% on average.)

Suzie asked me to tell you.

What do you think of the J H findings ?
Click to expand...

This is a complete fabrication.
Why do you do this, Bubba? Your doctor friend, Trump calling you, and now this. It's really quite sad. You don't have to puff yourself up like this: just say what you think, without all the imaginary expertise and the pretend conversations that never happened.
 
Some more detail of the Johns Hopkins report:
A new study out of Johns Hopkins University is claiming that worldwide pandemic lockdowns only prevented 0.2 per cent of COVID-19 deaths and were “not an effective way of reducing mortality rates during a pandemic.”...

The study did give partial credit to policies that shut down “non-essential” businesses — which they concluded could bring down COVID death rates by as much as 10 per cent. The study noted that this was “likely to be related to the closure of bars.”...

One cited paper is a November study published in the Review of Financial Studies. Researchers comprehensively broke down the COVID strictures in every single U.S. county throughout 2020 and then compared them against the county’s subsequent COVID fatality rates. That particular study found that restaurant closures and mask mandates saved lives, but that spa closures basically did nothing...

Another cited study is a July 2020 paper from The Lancet that tallied up COVID-19 outcomes in the world’s 50 hardest hit countries and then compared it to factors ranging from border closures to obesity rates. That study found that “full lockdowns” and “rapid border closures” could measurably bring down a country’s case rate, but didn’t have all that much effect on death rates.

Researchers excluded nearly 83 studies for consideration — including some that supported the efficacy of lockdowns. The most notable of which is a 2020 study published in the journal Nature that concluded that European lockdowns helped avert between 2.8 and 3.5 million deaths in the first months of the pandemic.
Click to expand...
Source.

So, and not surprisingly, a little more nuanced than Bubba would have us believe.
Bubba, why did your sources not tell you about these details?
Why did you not mention this one either?
Unlike much of the media-cited research on COVID-19 thus far, the new Johns Hopkins paper is by economists rather than by epidemiologists. Lead author Steve Hanke is a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute and a contributor to the right-leaning National Review.
Click to expand...

Not relevant so much because he is right-leaning, but because of his lack of medical credentials.
This has got him into trouble before:
n June 2020, Hanke tweeted that Vietnam was among the “rotten apples” of coronavirus data after misattributing the country's zero death count as "No Data Reported." After much outcry on social media and a petition to Johns Hopkins University signed by nearly 300 Vietnamese academics demanding an apology, Hanke issued a correction on Twitter stating that the country has a "perfect" record in its fight against coronavirus. In an interview with Voice of America (VOA) following the controversy, Hanke admitted that Vietnam's response to the pandemic was indeed "excellent," and he cited the country's poor record of press freedom as reasons behind his initial suspicion of its coronavirus data.
Click to expand...
Source.
 
Bubba said:
Deception factor goes whoosh, as usual
Click to expand...

Why don't you go ahead and define the "deception factor" and we'll see if it goes whoosh as loudly as any of your predictions about the last presidential election or QAnon.

I'm sorry. You don't like to talk about any of that any more, do you?

By the way, whatever happened to your "doctor friend"?
 
Foster Zygote said:
Why don't you go ahead and define the "deception factor" and we'll see if it goes whoosh as loudly as any of your predictions about the last presidential election or QAnon.

I'm sorry. You don't like to talk about any of that any more, do you?

By the way, whatever happened to your "doctor friend"?
Click to expand...

That is probably the "John Hopkins" that Bubba has so recently been telling things to.
 
Bubba said:
This sorta conflicts with what I've been telling John Hopkins, for months now, which I suggested they study.

Finally... the cool John Hopkins guys & gals took my advice. They just published their findings.

Excerpt from a phone call I got from Suzie, (she and I have been chatting on phone for months now) at John Hopkins:


[/I]

(Their report says lockdowns in Europe and the United States reduced covid mortality by only 0.2% on average.)

Suzie asked me to tell you.

What do you think of the J H findings ?
Click to expand...

Its Johns Hopkins

If you can't even get that right, well.....
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Some more detail of the Johns Hopkins report:

Source.

So, and not surprisingly, a little more nuanced than Bubba would have us believe.
Bubba, why did your sources not tell you about these details?
Why did you not mention this one either?


Not relevant so much because he is right-leaning, but because of his lack of medical credentials.
This has got him into trouble before:

Source.
Click to expand...

I guess we need to factor in deception when reading Bubba's sources.
 
eerok said:
Yeah, I didn't think it'd be this bad. Is this supposed to resemble an actual academic paper?
Click to expand...
One of the sentences in the early part of the paper literally starts with the phrase "Lickety-split." This reminds me of Kent Hovind's dissertation.
 
Bubba said:
You will remain clueless . . .
Click to expand...

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

OBAMAGATE!!

50,000 sealed indictments!

Frogmarching!

Military Tribunals!

Gitmo!

Executions!

Q!

The Coming Storm!

The Kraken!

Donnie Depends remaining in office!

Plandemic!

Wrong about everything; talk about clueless!!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
 
Bubba said:
Excerpt from a phone call I got from Suzie, (she and I have been chatting on phone for months now) at John Hopkins:


Suzie asked me to tell you.
Click to expand...

Did you replace (snicker) Amazing Polly with Suzy?

Do you deflate her when finished?
 
I saw Ivmmeta referenced, which, as Orac pointed out, appears to be a carbon copy of the 2020 vintage hydroxychloroquine meta.

I wonder what 2022's "miracle" drug is going to be...
 
KDLarsen said:
I saw Ivmmeta referenced, which, as Orac pointed out, appears to be a carbon copy of the 2020 vintage hydroxychloroquine meta.

I wonder what 2022's "miracle" drug is going to be...
Click to expand...

Lark's vomit - it just has to be.

Strange people with tiny buckets following larks around trying to induce them to vomit.
 
Here's a jumprope song.

Rooshian bot!
Rooshian bot!
You got nothin'
'N that's all you got!
Work for a koopek
Work for a rubble
Here come Sputin
Man, you in TROUBLE!

I woke up inspired this morning. Now it's time for a nap.
 
sackett said:
Here's a jumprope song.

Rooshian bot!
Rooshian bot!
You got nothin'
'N that's all you got!
Work for a koopek
Work for a rubble
Here come Sputin
Man, you in TROUBLE!

I woke up inspired this morning. Now it's time for a nap.
Click to expand...

Truly inspired tortured verse
Now I'll try for something worse
Won't be long, I'm always terse
Something, something, something purse.

On topic: The vaccines are not gene therapy because they don't alter your genes.

Also, they don't altar your jeans.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom