The Jan. 6 Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
BobTheCoward said:
You don't get to define what dimension I choose to assess partisanship. I don't mean democrat/republican.
Click to expand...

Partisanship has a meaning. It isn't whatever you want to say it is. This is like talking with religious apologists who think they can redefine every word as they go along.
 
BobTheCoward said:
A partisan is "a strong supporter of a party, cause, or person."
Click to expand...

Partisanship politically means that a representative puts loyalty to their party above their position on a specific issue.

But go ahead. Continue with the cognitive dissonance.
 
All I know is, if I'm paid $174k + perks to represent my party at large, I'm damn sure going to act like it.
 
BobTheCoward said:
Is it still bipartisan if one side vetoes the partisans they don't find acceptable?
Click to expand...

Lawyers for both sides of a case have the right to veto any jurors they feel are prejudiced for/against the defendant. Banks and Jordan are the equivalent of selecting two jurors who have made it very clear which way they would vote regardless of the evidence.
 
"Hey Judge, I don see One Eyed Larry or Ice Pick Jimmy or any o' da Gambinos on my jury, I tink dis may be one o' dem whaddyacallems....pahtisan witch hunts!"
 
Warp12 said:
All I know is, if I'm paid $174k + perks to represent my party at large, I'm damn sure going to act like it.
Click to expand...

They're not paid to represent their party. They are paid to do what is best for the United States.
 
acbytesla said:
They're not paid to represent their party. They are paid to do what is best for the United States.
Click to expand...

They are paid to represent their constituents not the United States not their party. Lying is showing disrespect to their Employers.
 
Last edited:
gnome said:
For me, it wouldn't even take a mythical paragon of impartiality to be acceptable, just someone that hits the low bar of "isn't likely to defend Trump no matter what".
Click to expand...

...any person who believes that Deputy Trump Butt-licker, Gym Jordan would be a fair and unbiased member of the J6 committee, and not defend Trump no matter what, and wouldn't leak information back to Trump Butt-licker in Chief, Kevin McCarthy, and would not try to turn the J6 committee into the "Gym Jordan Show" is living in Cloud Cuckoo Land.

... and anyone who believes Trump Butt-licker in Chief, Kevin McCarthy didn't put forward the names he did knowing full well that they would be totally unacceptable, is living in the same place as the previous person.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom