Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tippit said:
For all we know, you and all of the other pseudo-skeptics could be pathological liars. His anecdotes have more credibility with me than your corporate pharmaceutical "peer-reviewed" studies, rubber stamped by a captive FDA.
Click to expand...

So who are the health organisations in Russia, Hong Kong, China, South Korea, South Africa, UK, France, Germany, Tonga, UAE, Israel, and lets face, it every other country in the world captive to?

Because they sure as hell take no guidance whatsoever from Fauci or the FDA.

Your responses are laughable.
 
Oh God, yet more cherry picked and deliberately misrepresented data from the adverse reactions databases, mindless parroted by Bubba. Will he ever learn?
 
Bubba said:
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/...1HL&cid=20220123&mid=DM1098104&rid=1387673278
Click to expand...
Yup. Written by this guy:

https://quackwatch.org/11Ind/mercola/

And here is a little snippet at the bottom of a loooooooong list of fraudulent activities.

(QUOTE)
In March 2021, the Center for Countering Digital Hate placed Mercola first on its list of “The Disinformation Dozen” who “do not have relevant medical expertise and have their own pockets to line, who are abusing social media platforms to misrepresent the threat of Covid and spread misinformation about the safety of vaccines.” His live-in partner, Erin Elizabeth, was listed seventh. The report also estimated that Mercola’s accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram totaled about 3.6 million followers [37]. In July 2021, The New York Times called Mercola “the most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online.” (UNQUOTE)
 
Jim_MDP said:
15,000 MDs?
That's precious... there are just shy of one million doctors here. And without an audit, I'd be skeptical of even that many on their rolls.
Click to expand...

Bubba said:
Pretending just shy of one million doctors didnt notice the risks ie silencing, vilification, canceling, and firing of their more vocal colleagues for doing their job as doctors looks like...

One day may you realize you lauded liars and ridiculed heroes
Click to expand...

Bubba, do you really think that 15,000 is just shy of 1,000,000? 15,000 is 1.5% of 1,000,000.

Jesus! Are you that bad at math?
 
Bubba said:
Pretending just shy of one million doctors didnt notice the risks ie silencing, vilification, canceling, and firing of their more vocal colleagues for doing their job as doctors looks like...
Click to expand...

I know you like dancing around the maypole of bad science, but you don't have the support that you think you do. There are some crackpots and incompetents who you seem to cherish, but proper science has done pretty well with handling covid. At the end of the day, fewer people will have suffered and died. Vaccination and other protective measures work.

The jackasses you listen to will have been no help whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/...1HL&cid=20220123&mid=DM1098104&rid=1387673278
Click to expand...

Good article by a PhD research scientist at MIT. The type I Interferon suppression could introduce a whole host of problems down the road that are difficult to establish a cause from the "vaccine", which would give the elites plausible deniability.

My neighbor is battling some rare form of liver cancer, he was one of the first jabbed when they became available. On the other hand, he was a military airline mechanic, and was undoubtedly exposed to a lot of toxic chemicals.

The researcher even admits that the "vaccine" produces an incredibly strong Covid antibody response, but then it wanes. Perhaps the moniker associated with this toxic sludge should be renamed "unsafe and initially effective against Covid, with negative efficacy for everything else".
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
<Disinformationsnip>
Click to expand...
First you realize you've been engaging in playground pretend, then ruin it all by posting up the same silly nonsense that you've been vomiting for just about ever.

Likely, it's the manipulative media you consume.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Hear Ye ! Hear Ye !

Ye Fully Vaccinated True Believers of Saints & Partners Fauci & Gates!
(to includie Birthing People, Chestfeeders, and BigFatLie Gobblers).

The time draws nigh to stand up for really woke medical social justice and for Ye to gird thy ...um.......?

:confused: :eek: :confused: :eek:

The Big Lies are unraveling. The covid jab narrative crumbles daily. Sane nations are rejecting mandates while the most injected nations have soaring positives and admissions with your beloved forever jabs. One lying leader got busted for saying 90+% admitted were un-jabbed, but then the truth said it actually was around 37%.

they are lying to you. everyday.

Social Justice Justice Sotomayor lied when they/he/she bleated 100K kids are now seriously hospitalized with covid. She/they/he earlier went on the record barking how he/she/they is committed to promoting some other piece of batcrap social medical wack covid justice BS, which I will link for you, Tuesday or sooner...unless you care enough to do so for yourself....Oh you must look it up!...he/they/she is such a hoot.!!

Gosh, having said all that, I hope no one here now will imply I am a sexist, or ChestFeeder phobic. (I'm a big fan, actually!) (but hey, do attack, show your stuff!)

Or, you could go with say, iddy biddy needle phobic :thumbsup: :) ...sure try that lame dumb gambit, again. It is about all you got now that your Experimental Jab Happy Cult is exposed more every day by normal people.
Click to expand...


Are you doing okay?
 
Jim_MDP said:
15,000 MDs?
That's precious... there are just shy of one million doctors here. And without an audit, I'd be skeptical of even that many on their rolls. [emoji2955]
Click to expand...

Lists like that remind me of an old thread featuring such a list posted by a now banned member who went by Radrook. The list purported to present 57 famous scientists who opposed the theory of evolution by natural selection. I became immediately suspicious when I saw Francis Bacon near the top of the list of names. A quick search showed that 13 of those listed had died before Origin was published, some centuries before Darwin was even born, including Leonardo da Vinci, who died in 1519.

Further examination revealed that only 22 on the list had been alive at any point in the previous 50 years, when modern genetics become a factor in evolutionary biology, and only 7 worked in the field of biology in any capacity. All of them turned up hits relating to sites like Answers In Genesis or Christian Answers.

But the best part was when Radrook claimed that those on the list who had died long before Darwin had published his work, or had been born, was due to two separate lists having been accidentally jumbled when his computer crashed. Everyone knew this was ******** because computers don't work that way, but someone soon exposed Radrook as a pathetic liar by pointing out that the list he'd posted was lifted verbatim from Christian Answers. Since he's long since banned, I can say that Radrook really was a stupid ****-wit.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Hear Ye ! Hear Ye !

Ye Fully Vaccinated True Believers of Saints & Partners Fauci & Gates!
(to includie Birthing People, Chestfeeders, and BigFatLie Gobblers). [...]
Click to expand...

Gadzooks! You must call out a gardyloo before throwing such nonsense on our heads.
 
Tippit said:
Good article by a PhD research scientist at MIT.
Click to expand...

She's a computer scientist, not a biologist. If you want to ask her about computers, her credentials would carry some weight. But regarding epidemiology, her opinions are no more relevant than those of an electrical engineer or an art historian.
 
Tippit said:
My neighbor is battling some rare form of liver cancer, he was one of the first jabbed when they became available. On the other hand, he was a military airline mechanic, and was undoubtedly exposed to a lot of toxic chemicals.
Click to expand...
The post hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy is always an issue when determining cause and effect, yes.There are always confounding factors that need to be eliminated before a conclusion like "the Covid vaccines are increasing the incidence of cancer" can be reliably reached from raw data like that collected in the 'adverse reactions' databases.

Maybe we should find out what the per capita incidence of cases of cancer were in 2021, and whether they're significantly greater than in previous years, before jumping to conclusions? I believe there's a name for that methodology.
 
Pixel42 said:
The post hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy is always an issue when determining cause and effect, yes.There are always confounding factors that need to be eliminated before a conclusion like "the Covid vaccines are increasing the incidence of cancer" can be reliably reached from raw data like that collected in the 'adverse reactions' databases.

Maybe we should find out what the per capita incidence of cases of cancer were in 2021, and whether they're significantly greater than in previous years, before jumping to conclusions? I believe there's a name for that methodology.
Click to expand...

[holds up hand really high]Pick me! Pick me!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom