Mojo
Mostly harmless
However, you cited Bollyn as your source for the legal theory that the deportation of the Egyptians constituted enforced disappearance.
And she hasn’t been able to cite any other source for it.
However, you cited Bollyn as your source for the legal theory that the deportation of the Egyptians constituted enforced disappearance.
Oh my God, are you actually trying to rehabilitate Bollyn as a reputable source?
If you believe it was 'caused by a fire from nearby burning debris' or that Estonia suddenly sank 'because of a wave', that is your prerogative. The thinkers amongst us can see what is plain to see.
Case re-closed, is it?
It would be their fault (vicarious liability) if they were smuggling Russian/Soviet state secrets on a passenger ferry, which had a normal capacity of 70% Swedish citizens on any given trip.
No way did the ship sink in half an hour 'because a wave knocked off the bow visor'.
Why should I? It was merely an example of the many who believed Sweden had effectively 'disappeared' the two Egyptians in 2001.
You are surely forgetting the following, whose fates were unknown between 1952 and 1990. For forty-eight years they were 'disappeared', with their families, friends, neighbours, work colleagues et al having absolutely no idea what had happened to them.
Wiki
In fact, these guys, whose bodies were finally located and recovered just off the coast of Gotland (and nowhere near Russian territory as had been suggested) and they received their Gold Medals of Merit with Sword, nine years after Ensign Kenneth Svensson.
Then there are the presumed missing twelve Estonians.
Throw in the two Egyptians in 2001, and you can see that Sweden does have a fall back policy of disappearing people in the name of 'classified information'. Even when it is by dint of a foreign power (Clinton, Bush).
The Swedish Defence Forces Intelligence heard it as it happened! It knew roughly the location the plane had come down. They knew all along the men were almost certainly dead (given it was one lone Soviet MIG, with no rescue back up) yet they let the families think they had no idea what had happened to the men: perhaps they had been escorted to Russian territory and were now in a gulag, was the hope kept alive by the men's own and encouraged by the state. All along it knew they were dead yet let the families suffer false hope. It was Russia that actually declassified the information in 1990, not Sweden. It was only then it took action to recover the aircraft and the bodies, then dragged its heels with the Gold Medals of Merit with Sword.
Sure. And we can easily identify which is which.You will agree there is a big difference between someone setting out to spread disinformation and someone genuinely researching the situation?
Fact is, there exists both.
No. It may be that some Swedish journalist reported it, but that is not a primary source. The primary source is Bollyn's own claims. And those are particularly nutty claims.In any case, whatever, Bollyn's political slant, his reference to 'disappeared Egyptians' was sourced from a Swedish investigative journalist called Sven Anér, so can hardly claim to have copyright to it.
It would be their fault (vicarious liability) if they were smuggling Russian/Soviet state secrets on a passenger ferry, which had a normal capacity of 70% Swedish citizens on any given trip.
No way did the ship sink in half an hour 'because a wave knocked off the bow visor'.
I am not 100% sure that being sceptical of the 9/11 'official reason' makes a person an 'anti-Semite'. Just because Bollyn believes it was a Zionist-backed plot doesn't make it 'anti-Semitic' in itself. The red flag is that he believes there is a Zionist plot to flood Christian democratic countries with pornography to undermine them, according to a post SpitfireX posted. That is assuming the excerpt is authentic and in context.
You will agree there is a big difference between someone setting out to spread disinformation and someone genuinely researching the situation?
Fact is, there exists both.
No. SpitfireX claimed the extract was by Bollyn. I have no idea whether or not it was in context or a genuine extract.
The only person in addition to you that believes that the Egyptians were disappeared by Sweden is an anti-semite conspiracy theorist.
What have I told you about parroting arguments by nasty people? Well, when you do that, people start to believe that you are one of the nasty people, too.
And you didn't care to find out. That's the ongoing problem.
But you do need a background in structural engineering to know such things, which you do not have. This is what makes it difficult to take you seriously. You literally believe that what little you may know about a very complicated subject is enough to render an opinion about it that others are bound to respect. Do you ever consider the possibility that other people might be smarter than you?
What a person believes is not so important to me as why he believes it. I have beliefs about the things you mention because they happen to arise from the licensed field I've dedicated my life to learning and practicing. It takes years of education, years of apprenticeship, and a dedication to ongoing learning, adjudication, and practice.
You seem to believe things because you want to pretend you're smart, and conspiracy theories give you a shortcut to that emotional payoff.
You're not a thinker. You can't demonstrate having thought about anything you've posted here. All you can demonstrate is your willingness to gullibly parrot conspiracy theorists and other nutjobs and suggest that others think you clever and insightful for doing so.
The rest of us, who have actually learned the subjects you're playing with, are trying to teach you, but you have zero interest in learning. No, you're not some savant magically endowed with the ability to see through obfuscation. You're just a typical conspiracy theorist with delusions of grandeur.
The rest of your post is yet another attempt to apologize for Christopher Bollyn. If you want to make that bed you'll have to lay in it yourself. The man has no credibility with me, but if you want to keep citing him as a source, prepare to be laughed at.
You are right. There is a detailed report with extensive supporting documentation that shows what happened.
You should read it sometime.
They didn't disappear, they were returned to Egypt so what people believed was wrong.
That's why you shouldn't rely on belief.
Unlike you, I don't trot out meaningless phrases such as 'nutjobs'; and try to pass it off as reasoned debate.
War is hell.
In fact there are still many thousands of servicemen who are still officially missing from lots of wars.