• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Implying that >800,000 dead Americans are miscategorized deaths of all kinds simply because of one clerical error made under pressure and later corrected is, frankly, an incredibly stupid argument.

Do you have any evidence that that was a clerical error?

The politically-appointed medical examiner argued that it was a valid assessment.

Who knows how many heart attacks and cancer deaths have been attributed to CV-19?
 
Last edited:
Do you have any evidence that that was a clerical error?
Do you have the evidence bruto requested in post #287?

Who knows how many heart attacks and cancer deaths have been attributed to CV-19?

Do you have any evidence this has occurred in significant numbers? Or are you jaqing off?
 
Well, I'm not a member of the only cult I've seen promoted in this thread - namely the cult of personality that worships Putin.

Still, since it's Christmas, I dedicate this blast from the past to you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0&t=3s


Super lame. Living Colour? LOL

It wasn't me who did bring up Putin or David Icke in this thread. It were weak-minded pseudo-skeptics who cannot deal with the arguments (countless times only crickets).

Here, an answer for you that is 911 times better than your lame song:

 
Do you have any evidence that that was a clerical error?

The politically-appointed medical examiner argued that it was a valid assessment.

Who knows how many heart attacks and cancer deaths have been attributed to CV-19?
In relative order to your nonsense:

Yes, the entire situation of it being a one-off.

No he didn't, he said, "But you could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash. I don’t know the conclusion of that one.” Basically he said that such an argument COULD be made, but that he didn't KNOW if it was valid.

Speculation over numbers involving above 800,000 listed deaths based on ONE clerical error is fundamentally illogical and an indication of deep desperation.
 
Right here in Florida they once mistook a motorcycle death for Covid-19.

It's true.

I swear on the soul of my father, Domingo Montoya.

Do you have any evidence that that was a clerical error?

The politically-appointed medical examiner argued that it was a valid assessment.

Who knows how many heart attacks and cancer deaths have been attributed to CV-19?

But that was not the question I asked or even close to it. You suggested that Covid tests mistakenly identify common colds as Covid. It was not a question about how deaths are attributed, or whether a misattributed motorcycle death might skew a nation's statistics. It was and only was, related to whether you have evidence that Covid tests claim that common colds are Covid. Just that.
 
Well, here I sit all on my lonesome on Christmas day. Of 14 of us supposedly sitting down to xmas dinner 5 have covid, 2 are heart lung recipients so are staying the hell away from anyone, 2 flew in from switzerland and are isolating in a hotel, 2 more were rocking up from the boonies not any more, I just had the booster so I am a mess of side effects and not fit for human consumption. To add to that, Sarah, 32, suicided.

So thanks to the antivaxxers, merry ******* christmas.
Ouch. :(
Pleasantly crowded here, ten humans and the cat.
 
Implying that >800,000 dead Americans are miscategorized deaths of all kinds simply because of one clerical error made under pressure and later corrected is, frankly, an incredibly stupid argument.

At least consistent with all the other arguments offered by our intrepid correspondent.
 
Covid is nothing to worry about: it is extremely rarely fatal.. The huge number of deaths is due to government hit squads.
so nothing to worry about.
 
But that was not the question I asked or even close to it. You suggested that Covid tests mistakenly identify common colds as Covid. It was not a question about how deaths are attributed, or whether a misattributed motorcycle death might skew a nation's statistics. It was and only was, related to whether you have evidence that Covid tests claim that common colds are Covid. Just that.


Ever heard about Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR-Test? He won a Nobel Prize for it and had some interesting things to say. "Conveniently" died in late 2019. Here are two minutes of what he said about the criminal Anthony Fauci:

 
'Mullis attracted controversy for denying humans' role in climate change and for expressing doubts that HIV causes AIDS.'

So this chap managed to do something to benefit humanity in spite of being an absolute loon. His views on Dr. Fauci are no doubt equally reliable.
 
'Mullis attracted controversy for denying humans' role in climate change and for expressing doubts that HIV causes AIDS.'.


'Steve is an absolute loon from down-under who believes in every big lie ever told. If people who have, unlike Steve, shown their brilliance in other fields, doubt even one of those big lies, Steve thinks he can dismiss all of their statements.'

Just quoting from somewhere on the internet.
 
Last edited:
Ever heard about Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR-Test? He won a Nobel Prize for it and had some interesting things to say.
Do you understand his argument? Do you understand how, even if correct, it has no impact on its ability to identify the presence of COVID-19?
 
Ever heard about Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR-Test? He won a Nobel Prize for it and had some interesting things to say. "Conveniently" died in late 2019. Here are two minutes of what he said about the criminal Anthony Fauci:

Was my question about Fauci? I don't think so. Was my question about what you think about this or that? I don't think so. I realize that it is out of fashion these days to think of only one thing at a time, and clearly beyond the capability of many to understand how a question could possibly be about what it is about, but my question, foolishly narrow though it might be, was whether Tom Palven's assertion that Covid tests are mistakenly identifying common colds as Covid is backed by credible evidence. By the way, I probably omitted the qualifier of "credible" before, out of mistaken optimism, but suggest that it would be helpful if it is not utter crap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom