• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump Lawyer Goes Full Deep-End Truther

Axxman300

Philosopher
Axxman300
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
7,981
Location
Central California Coast
Lin Wood says the planes that hit the towers were CGI...In public...on loud speakers...

https://www.newsweek.com/lin-wood-c...in-towers-pentagon-9-11-we-got-played-1634989

Wood rose to national prominence in late 2020 as he worked with attorney Sidney Powell and other Trump allies to file baseless election challenge lawsuits alleging that the presidential election was "rigged" or "stolen" from former President Donald Trump. The lawyer has continued to spread misinformation about the election, as well as promote other bizarre conspiracy theories within conservative circles in recent months.

"Let's talk about CGI—computer graphics generated images. You know what CGI is? You know what deep fake videos are? I know you know what Photoshopping is," Wood told a crowd in Glynn County, Georgia on Friday. The conspiracy theorist went on to suggest that the infamous videos and photos of the 9/11 attacks were just CGI or deep fakes.

"On 9/11 what appeared to be a plane hit one building, what appeared to be a plane hit another building, then later that night another building fell down. It wasn't hit by a dadgum thing," he said. Wood went on to claim that the Pentagon "got hit by a missile," not a plane. "There were no plane fragments found at any of the sites—New York, Pennsylvania, the Pentagon."
Click to expand...

I just can't any more...
 
Is he related to Judy Wood?

Sound like he's been reading her craptastic theories.
 
Orphia Nay said:
Is he related to Judy Wood?

Sound like he's been reading her craptastic theories.
Click to expand...

HE watched the Movie in planesight about the Pentagon years ago, he and the President’s Advisor Jerome Corsi were taken in by Lyte Tripp's Pentagon no Plane Theories.
Trump is a JFK conspiracy theorist, himself.
None of these people are connected to reality.
 
The woo-world Anon, cross-pollination of CTs is a must, since in order for others to buy into your BS you first have to buy into theirs.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
The woo-world Anon, cross-pollination of CTs is a must, since in order for others to buy into your BS you first have to buy into theirs.
Click to expand...

Like My dear departed Mother Told me, wildNuts come in Many varieties and Flavors just watch out for the ones that are rotten to the core.
 
It's a world view... gov lies... so any "new story" where the gov takes a "position" it must be a lie, deception, false flag. cover up and the like.... 9/11... pandemic... can't believe on without the other.

The Gage booting is maybe an outlier. AE911T is trying to support the illusion they are science and engineering based "researchers" and nothing could be further from the truth. And they tried to steer clear of the Pentagon and Shanksville because "their expertise" was high rise buildings.
 
It's a Cargo-Cult approach to scientific investigation: like a Spell, you will get the result you want if you use terms like "do your own research, follow the money, don't be a sheeple" etc.
 
we all do research with google online ;)

I have been trying to do online search for images of recovered WTC columns. I am aware that much of the steel was sold for scrap... I believe NIST grabbed some... Some went to a hanger 17 at JFK and I think to a site in Fresh Kills.

I want to see evidence of "buckled" columns.

We can see sheets of perimeter column assemblies which broke free from the building as a result of connection failures. But I see no evidence of bucking in perimeter sheets.

If this is true... is there any "steel" evidence of buckling?

There are photos of the "Horse shoe" column. That apparently was the result of a heated more malleable core column that has it's lower portion "restrained" and the upper portion "restrained" but in the upper block which moved laterally as it dropped. This may be an example of buckling.

So it appears that there is virtually no evidence of buckled COLUMNS except those from 2WTC
core at the level of the plane strike when the top tipped over and dropped. And that motion has yet to be, in my opinion, properly explained and described in detail.
 
So there was no "crime scene" attempt to secure evidence after the collapse. At first it was all about searching for and hopefully finding survivors. And then is was about recovering the dead and and human remains.

It was obvious... with the twin towers planes hit them and some how the ensuing fires caused them to collapse. 7WTC seemed to have succumbed to fires.

Concerns were... how do we get more people out faster from high rises.... and how to we protect steel "better" to give people time to escape.

NIST came along afterwards and there were already "experts" (mis)explaining how the buildings collapsed... Most got the heat element's contribution even when they didn't get where and how it was "fatal" in the twin towers.

NIST did get some steel for study. They were interested in the facade (their theory) but I would have thought they would have grabbed col 79 and the girders and beams in that quadrant on those floors. Steel can be identified by measuring it. Sure there are many of the same cross sections used. But it's a start... cross section.... drill pattern... length... web stiffeners and so on.

I guess it didn't matter much....

The explanations were all "theoretical" models.
 
JSanderO said:
So there was no "crime scene" attempt to secure evidence after the collapse. At first it was all about searching for and hopefully finding survivors. And then is was about recovering the dead and and human remains.

It was obvious... with the twin towers planes hit them and some how the ensuing fires caused them to collapse. 7WTC seemed to have succumbed to fires.

Concerns were... how do we get more people out faster from high rises.... and how to we protect steel "better" to give people time to escape.

NIST came along afterwards and there were already "experts" (mis)explaining how the buildings collapsed... Most got the heat element's contribution even when they didn't get where and how it was "fatal" in the twin towers.

NIST did get some steel for study. They were interested in the facade (their theory) but I would have thought they would have grabbed col 79 and the girders and beams in that quadrant on those floors. Steel can be identified by measuring it. Sure there are many of the same cross sections used. But it's a start... cross section.... drill pattern... length... web stiffeners and so on.

I guess it didn't matter much....

The explanations were all "theoretical" models.
Click to expand...

There was evidence of buckling and torn ripped columns, the horse shoe Column as I recall was directly Impacted by the Plane.
Remember the columns didn't fully Buckle before the welds broke, they bent to the point of fracture then debuckled from the lower section.
David B. Benson had and Einstein on Physorg had a complete history of those, one White Eye Might have preserved some of that From Physorg.
 
JSanderO said:
we all do research with google online ;)

I have been trying to do online search for images of recovered WTC columns. I am aware that much of the steel was sold for scrap... I believe NIST grabbed some... Some went to a hanger 17 at JFK and I think to a site in Fresh Kills.

I want to see evidence of "buckled" columns.

We can see sheets of perimeter column assemblies which broke free from the building as a result of connection failures. But I see no evidence of bucking in perimeter sheets.

If this is true... is there any "steel" evidence of buckling?

There are photos of the "Horse shoe" column. That apparently was the result of a heated more malleable core column that has it's lower portion "restrained" and the upper portion "restrained" but in the upper block which moved laterally as it dropped. This may be an example of buckling.

So it appears that there is virtually no evidence of buckled COLUMNS except those from 2WTC
core at the level of the plane strike when the top tipped over and dropped. And that motion has yet to be, in my opinion, properly explained and described in detail.
Click to expand...

The Top tipped over until the welds on the Columns fractured, then because it no longer had the strength to form a Fulcrum to provide a tipping point it dropped strait into the lower portion of the building. Remember the lower bracing of the building (Beams and Trusses) ))was being destroyed as the building was tilting.
 
Claims of CGI planes is planted disinformation to misdirect the audience from asking legitimate questions and make those who do look silly. The first red flag of planted disinformation I can remember was the 4000 Jews who didn't die at WTC then came the pods on the planes theories and Alex Jones.
 
geggy said:
Claims of CGI planes is planted disinformation to misdirect the audience from asking legitimate questions and make those who do look silly. The first red flag of planted disinformation I can remember was the 4000 Jews who didn't die at WTC then came the pods on the planes theories and Alex Jones.
Click to expand...
ORLY?

Do tell us more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom