• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Steven Avery: Making of a Murderer Part 2

Samson said:
Essexman:

I understood there was a video of a flyover showing the rav4 was not in its found position several days after the disappearance. Is this so and how does it fit in with Avery's alleged actions?
Click to expand...

There is no such video showing the RAV4 not where it was found.
 
Last edited:
Zellner's record

The last time I looked, Ms. Zellner had represented twenty individuals who were exonerated. That does not guarantee any particular result in the Avery case, but tells us something about her work.
 
Eugene Volokh's opinion

Mr. Colborn's lawsuit is not even at the discovery stage. Professor Eugene Volokh wrote, "The resolution of these issues must, at a minimum, await discovery and summary judgment…."
 
clarification

Chris_Halkides said:
Mr. Colborn's lawsuit is not even at the discovery stage. Professor Eugene Volokh wrote, "The resolution of these issues must, at a minimum, await discovery and summary judgment…."
Click to expand...
Professor Volokh was quoting a portion of the judgment allowing the suit to go forward, not necessarily giving his own opinion.
 
Last edited:
Since Steven Averys's mother died the other day, his brother Earl has recently posted this on facebook.


‘ **** Steven Avery he’s not my ******* brother your mother is going to haunt you for the misery you put her through. Why don’t you leave us out of your life because we don’t want you in ours!

His mommy is gone now and I can start telling the truth that ****** is a psychopath

No I am not OK I got a psychopath that keeps threatening my family and his name is Steven Avery…

All i’m going to reply to now is I was the closest one to him and that day that happened and he was acting really really strange I am not replying no more comments

Well i’m out here looking after my mother…while he’s sitting there talking **** all about us …the world deserves to know’
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some information on Earl Avery

"Earl pleaded no contest to battery after beating and choking his wife during an argument. He served 10 days in jail and 18 months probation. In 1995, he was charged with and pleaded no contest to fourth degree sexual assault and battery of his two daughters, serving 45 days in jail and three years probation. Earl Avery was also charged in 2011 of videotaping children and adults as they changed in the bathroom during a pool party. Earl admitted to the charges and was sentenced to six months in jail and probation. In 2013 he was found guilty of driving while intoxicated and fined." link

Taking the above as presumptively true, I am not that interested in what Earl Avery says. Earl is Kayla's father.

John Ferak wrote, "One of the most difficult aspects of the wrongful conviction movement is that most states do not allow inmates convicted of murder to get a temporary release from prison to attend a loved one's visitation and funeral service."
 
Last edited:
Kayla has also posted on facebook

"We believe Brendan was forced to help cus that was the type of person he was.

No you’re not wrong but he could have been scared of Steven idk i’m not them but ik for a fact now Steven is not innocent n with his past. When he was out how many women he raped when he got out. Its just wrong but no one came forward cuz they know they wouldn’t have won so idk what to tell you people but please understand who you are trying to help ok.’"


https://www.facebook.com/groups/MaMGossip/?ref=share
 
How did the cell phone come to a remote position?
How could the body be reduced so quickly in the burn pit?
Two questions.
 
Last edited:
Samson said:
How did the cell phone come to a remote position?
How could the body be reduced so quickly in the burn pit?
Two questions.
Click to expand...
Eta
The pit is shallow.
To generate heat a deep narrow pit is indicated.
I have seen this eliminating unneeded shelter belts of trees.
 
Netflix response to Colborn's lawsuit

Netflix contends the claims are barred under the First and Fourteenth Amendments; says “Some or all of the challenged statements are not “of and concerning” the Plaintiff”; “Any allegedly defamatory statement of and concerning Plaintiff is true or substantially true, and Plaintiff cannot carry his burden of proving that they are materially false”; “Some or all of the challenged statements are not defamatory or defamatory per se.”

Additionally, “Netflix did not intend to convey the implications alleged” and “Netflix did not endorse the implications alleged,” the reply states. “Plaintiff impermissibly attempts to end-run the requirements of libel law by labeling his claims as “intentional infliction of emotional distress.”” link to story link to response
 
Not trying to be a dick, but everyone in that family writes in a stream-of-consciousness that's really difficult to read.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom