Today's Mass Shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's too late. There are more guns in circulation than people.

It will never happen.

Our nation was founded on political violence and our founders viewed it as a feature not a bug. That is why we should celebrate these political shootings as being emblematic of American freedom.
 
I'm really baffled by anyone, especially liberals, who have witnessed the totally hands-off approach US police take to right wing violence and think unilateral disarming is a good approach to stability in this country.

Every fascist, white nationalist, neo-confederate, Christian dominionist, Qanon crank, and so on is armed to the teeth and the cops will not lift a finger when they're kicking your teeth in or gunning you down in public. Probably should consider hitting the range.
 
Last edited:
We get it. Black on black crime is a huge thing. Everyoe knows that. All of this "Do the Proud Boys have a contingent in Maury, North Carolina?" is just a thread hijack.


And I think it's nice to do a service to call attention to it, sort of. It is conceivable that there are people who actually think that gun violence in America mostly consists of white males on rampages. They would have to be idiots to think that, but there are idiots in the world, and maybe some of them are here.

So, now that you've called attention to black on black crime, and everyone understands it, say something useful for a change. Say something that isn't some boring repetition of the same old ****.

Do you think there are any solutions?

Personally, I think making it much, much, harder to get a permit to carry a weapon would put a little dent in the situation, and while it would not solve the problem, it's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness, so that's one thing I would do.

What would you do?

It could have a fairly large impact.

Illegal guns don't last very long as they are incriminating. So criminals rely on a steady stream of new illegal guns that were initially legal.
 
In Chicago, 1418 people have been shot this year.

But duh spree shooters.

But duh racist police.

But duh Trumpers.

Clown world.

To my way of thinking, those 1418 people shot in Chicago provide a far, far, better reason for gun control than the occasional spree shooter that takes out 6, or 8, or 50 people.

(The record is still right about 50 isn't it? Las Vegas concert? It's so hard to keep track.)

ETA: I checked. 60 dead, 411 wounded. 411? That's a lot of wounded. I think that only counts gunshot wounds. Another 867 injuries from tramples and such. But Anders Brevik got 69. Not nearly as many total casualties.
 
Last edited:
The real hypocrisy is that they suddenly want to strip away the Second Amendment. They were perfectly fine with gun violence in Chicago pre-Trump and before we had "mass" shootings.

Who are 'they'? And when was 'before mass shootings'?
 
To my way of thinking, those 1418 people shot in Chicago provide a far, far, better reason for gun control than the occasional spree shooter that takes out 6, or 8, or 50 people.

(The record is still right about 50 isn't it? Las Vegas concert? It's so hard to keep track.)

ETA: I checked. 60 dead, 411 wounded. 411? That's a lot of wounded. I think that only counts gunshot wounds. Another 867 injuries from tramples and such. But Anders Brevik got 69. Not nearly as many total casualties.

The Las Vegas concert shooting also created thousands of PTSD cases.

Most gun violence is easy to avoid. Don’t hang out in high crime neighborhoods and stay away from people that are obsessed with firearms or have anger problems. Mass shootings are rarer but not as easily avoided.
 
The Las Vegas concert shooting also created thousands of PTSD cases.

Most gun violence is easy to avoid. Don’t hang out in high crime neighborhoods and stay away from people that are obsessed with firearms or have anger problems. Mass shootings are rarer but not as easily avoided.

Sounds like good advice. Prior to my next visit to the US can you give me some help in identifying "people that are obsessed with firearms" and how to "easily" avoid those mass shooting areas?
 
The Las Vegas concert shooting also created thousands of PTSD cases.

Most gun violence is easy to avoid. Don’t hang out in high crime neighborhoods and stay away from people that are obsessed with firearms or have anger problems. Mass shootings are rarer but not as easily avoided.

To be fair, it's easy to avoid hanging out in high crime neighborhoods if you happen to be middle class, and being white couldn't hurt.
 
Let's get started on this weekends not-MAGA-related mass shootings list.


Shooting at a housing project where one person is dead and nine others injured including a 2-year-old and 13-year-old. The mayor is asking for people to "# Saysomething." He must've forgotten that snitches get stitches.

I found this not so curious at all. The mayor said, "Savanna has been victimized by a mass shooting."

https://www.wjcl.com/article/one-sh...-wounded-at-savannah-housing-project/36704185



2 dead, 2 injured during a drive-by shooting in the middle of the afternoon on a busy street in White Center, Washington. The exclusionary and oppressive white supremacist name of the town is probably responsible for the violent behavior.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/...nter/281-448e75a5-1ffd-4b94-8db6-ae4bf246d555
 
Let's get started on this weekends not-MAGA-related mass shootings list.


Shooting at a housing project where one person is dead and nine others injured including a 2-year-old and 13-year-old. The mayor is asking for people to "# Saysomething." He must've forgotten that snitches get stitches.

I found this not so curious at all. The mayor said, "Savanna has been victimized by a mass shooting."

https://www.wjcl.com/article/one-sh...-wounded-at-savannah-housing-project/36704185



2 dead, 2 injured during a drive-by shooting in the middle of the afternoon on a busy street in White Center, Washington. The exclusionary and oppressive white supremacist name of the town is probably responsible for the violent behavior.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/...nter/281-448e75a5-1ffd-4b94-8db6-ae4bf246d555

With all the surveillance technology in the world today, it's hard to believe murders like this go unsolved, especially the drive-bys. I can see how a person on foot might escape detection, but cars are big, and there are cameras pointing at them, a lot.
 
Shooting at a housing project where one person is dead and nine others injured including a 2-year-old and 13-year-old.

Why were these people not issued guns when they moved into the neighborhood? We know that potential victims having guns stops them from becoming victims and can even turn them into heroes who can take down the shooter. If everyone in these neighborhoods was armed, residents could defend themselves properly.


2 dead, 2 injured during a drive-by shooting in the middle of the afternoon on a busy street in White Center, Washington.

Cars are already deadly weapons that we don't ban. So how is it we have people who have both cars and guns, but these four pedestrians didn't have anything at all? Not only should they have been armed, but people should be literally required to carry at least a handgun on them at all times in case of problems like this. This article could've been about four heroes and instead it's about four victims.
 
Why were these people not issued guns when they moved into the neighborhood? We know that potential victims having guns stops them from becoming victims and can even turn them into heroes who can take down the shooter. If everyone in these neighborhoods was armed, residents could defend themselves properly.




Cars are already deadly weapons that we don't ban. So how is it we have people who have both cars and guns, but these four pedestrians didn't have anything at all? Not only should they have been armed, but people should be literally required to carry at least a handgun on them at all times in case of problems like this. This article could've been about four heroes and instead it's about four victims.


Wouldn't it be much easier just to make shooting at people illegal? I mean, geez, making something illegal will surely make the problem go away.

I wonder if anyone has thought about trying such a brilliant idea with illicit drugs, explosives, child pornography, etc.? I think I shall write my elected representatives and have them ban such things, think of all the problems that will be solved.

In fact, I'm going to ask them to ban alcohol as well. Just imagine all the drunk driving fatalities, violence and abuse, injuries that would no longer happen if we just banned alcohol.

I really think I'm onto something here, thank you for the inspiration, Checkmite.
 
Wouldn't it be much easier just to make shooting at people illegal? I mean, geez, making something illegal will surely make the problem go away.

That's ridiculous. If you make shooting at people illegal, that means that people can't shoot their attackers in self defense like they're supposed to, and law abiding heroes can't shoot down criminals and save lives.

It makes far more sense to distribute guns or, since that's kind of commie-talk, at least make sure everyone is legally required to have one and carry it at all times in case they need to defend themselves or find a chance to act as a hero.
 
If you make shooting at people illegal then only criminals will shoot at people.
 
...snip...It makes far more sense to distribute guns or, since that's kind of commie-talk, at least make sure everyone is legally required to have one and carry it at all times in case they need to defend themselves or find a chance to act as a hero.

Welcome to Switzerland... Funny how they seem to muddle along.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom