• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Google censorship

There's always ask.com

Imagine unironically posting a Veritas story. Couldn't be me.
 
Project Veritas uncovers...

...very little that stands up to rigorous inquiry.

...how Google is abusing it's power and manipulating the minds of Americans.

No. The far right complains about being "censored" by large media corporations. The more credible pattern is that what Google's users want in terms of accurate information doesn't conform to the far right's desire to propagandize blatantly non-factual claims.

Using footage of people within Google...

The selective and deceptive editing of which has been Project Veritas' repeated downfall. As a result, they aren't taken seriously outside a small circle of the political right.

It shows how they are brainwashing all of us to their ultra-leftist agenda (to use the phrasing of the technical project manager).

No. Google are brazen capitalists. And Silicon Valley is not "ultra-leftist," as the far right would have everyone believe. The prevailing political view in Silicon Valley is a sort of naive Libertarianism.
 
The Left cannot abide Project Veritas.

Correct, but not for the reasons you imagine.

The one thing that pisses them so royally is that they are always proved factual and honest.

Except, of course, in the repeated, well-documented cases in which they've been shown to intentionally lie and distort. This is what the left cannot abide, and what no honest person should abide.

fail to see that the MSM is crumbling to dust .

This has nothing to do with mainstream media. It's a simple case of an organization with a politically conservative bias willing to lie and distort to establish a false narrative under the guise of investigation.
 
It's not just Google. There's a vast ultra-leftist conspiracy brainwashing you into thinking that Google are the only bad guys - when in fact there are billions of ultra-leftists in on it. I know because I am one of them.

The other posters in this thread? They are in on it too. And the MSM, and everyone who isn't a republican (and some who are), all foreigners, brown people, and anyone else who doesn't agree with you 100%. But that's not all. have you ever wondered why the Project Veritas guys seem to be such bumbling idiots? That's by design. You see, they are in on it too!
Did you get your shill check yet? I'm still waiting on mine. I hope I filled out the shill paperwork properly.
 
I'm really tickled by the idea that massive, near monopoly mega corporations wielding undue influence in the public sphere is the product of leftist political ideology run amok.

The right wing freaks that have been begging for loosening all constraints on the capitalist classes have got what they wanted, and hard. I hope they enjoy the capitalist hell world they've always been begging for where Google might snap their fingers and decide your viewpoint is verboten and there's nothing you can do about it.

Fingers crossed that right wingers somehow find themselves ass-backwards taking up an anti-trust and anti-monopoly stance towards big business by way of "owning the libs". Truly the world's brightest minds at work.
 
Last edited:
The Left cannot abide Project Veritas.
One can be politically conservative and still be offended by Project Veritas' utter ********.

The one thing that pisses them so royally is that they are always proved factual and honest .
Picture me laughing so hard I have to lay down on the floor.

So the Gullibles resort to attempted ridicule and whilst bloviating fail to see that the MSM is crumbling to dust .
I'm guessing you didn't know about this:
In August 2010, O'Keefe planned a staged encounter with the CNN correspondent Abbie Boudreau, who was doing a documentary on the young conservative movement. He set up an appointment at his office in Maryland to discuss a video shoot. Izzy Santa, executive director of Project Veritas, warned Boudreau that O'Keefe was planning to "punk" her on the boat by trying to seduce her—which he would film on hidden cameras. Boudreau did not board the boat and soon left the area.
Their own executive director was so creeped out by O'Keefe's semi-rapey stunt that she felt compelled to warn Boudreau.

CNN later published a 13-page plan written by O'Keefe mentor Ben Wetmore. It listed props for the boat scheme, including pornography, sexual aids, condoms, a blindfold and "fuzzy" handcuffs. When questioned by CNN, O'Keefe denied he was going to follow the Wetmore plan, as he found parts of it inappropriate. Boudreau commented "that does not appear to be true, according to a series of emails we obtained from Izzy Santa, who says the e-mails reveal James' true intentions."
Thirteen pages! It's hard to believe that they weren't getting off on it like a couple of adolescent boys. O'Keefe didn't even deny that the thirteen page plan was real - he just found parts of it inappropriate. It's so hard to believe that O'Keefe isn't married.

Following the Boudreau incident, Project Veritas paid Izzy Santa a five-figure settlement after she threatened to sue, which included a nondisclosure agreement.
So the emails were so damning that they settled out of court and stipulated that their creepiness remain hidden from the public.

There's a reason O'Keefe is reviled and ridiculed.
 
Last edited:
The Left cannot abide Project Veritas .

The one thing that pisses them so royally is that they are always proved factual and honest .
Except, as everyone knows, they're invariably proven to be bollocks. Lies, deceptive editing. outright fabrications et cetera. But then most USAian rightists are to dumb to tell the difference.
 
Is there some weird Merkinanian definition of "left wing" in politics which is completely different to what anyone in Europe understands by "left wing"? 'Cos whenever I read some Merkinanian complaining about someone being too left it's someone who's equivalent to a One Nation Tory or might just about cut it as a Blairite Labour bod, rather than someone properly left.And as for the likes of Gurgle being remotely "left"...
 
Is there some weird Merkinanian definition of "left wing" in politics which is completely different to what anyone in Europe understands by "left wing"? 'Cos whenever I read some Merkinanian complaining about someone being too left it's someone who's equivalent to a One Nation Tory or might just about cut it as a Blairite Labour bod, rather than someone properly left.And as for the likes of Gurgle being remotely "left"...


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=351553
 
^ Aaaaah, missed that one.

So, left = anyone who isn't an outright Nazi (or other fascist group member of choice).

Where do Illinois Nazis sit in this weird spectrum? Inquiring minds need to know.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom