I'm still confused. Why haven't we determined how fast the old man could run? Why isn't that important this time?
.
Why hasn't this happened?!? Why not that?!?
And then, someone will eventually answer, and it will be:
I told you that's what they would do!
The reason there aren't a lot of questions being asked this time is because this is a very straightforward, easy to understand, interaction.
Guy goes through drive thru- Something goes wrong. We don't know what, but we know that whoever was manning the drive through tells the old man to go away. (Was the interaction racially charged? That would be kind of interesting to know, though not terribly important.)
Old man, angry because drive thru staff didn't do what he wanted, instead of leaving, decides to confront the manager and complain. So far, this is pretty standard stuff.
While complaining to manager, used the N-word. Well that's unexpected. It's a bit of an anachronism. Manager gets mad, and punches customer in the face. Uh....oh....that's a no-no. But wait, it gets worse. Man falls to the ground, hits head, and dies. Manager is now in deep doo-doo.
But....there's really nothing to analyze or question. Everyone pretty much knows what went on. We can debate about who is right and who is wrong, or exactly who should be laughed at, but there are no facts in dispute.
What the manager should have done, though, was goad the customer just a little bit more. If the customer could have been egged on enough to throw his food, it could have been a hate crime, like that woman last week at the Burger King.