shemp
a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
But are they edible or poisonous?
I think it's like, wouldn't that be so cool! Then you think it would be so easy to check and obviously they aren't mushrooms.![]()
![]()
Although similarities in morphology are not proof of life, growth, movement, and changes in shape and location constitute behavior and support the hypothesis there is life on Mars.
But are they edible or poisonous?
But are they edible or poisonous?
All things from Mars are bent on destruction of the Earth. They are obviously poisonous.
I was dissing Popular Mechanics for running the story because it was so obviously fake, but I think a better target for the dissing would be Advances in Microbiology. It looks like a legit journal, and they published the original paper.

Regardless, you can download the entire 67 page document from Research Gate (link in Gord's post earlier)
It certainly makes interesting reading, and if it is entirely fake (as in made up from whole cloth) then whoever did it has done a fantastic job. I have read a lot of scientific and engineering papers over the years, and this one looks pretty real.
When you start checking into the background of the primary authors, most seem legit
Ashraf Elewa PhD. Professor in the Department of Geology at Minia University Al Minyā, Egypt
Xinli Wi PhD. Professor at the Key Laboratory of Systematic Mycology and Lichenology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Olivier Planchon PhD. Research scientist working on Environmental Biogeoscience at the French National Centre for Scientific Research, Paris, France.
This guy seems a bit of an oddball though
Rhawn Gabriel Joseph PhD, has some very strange ideas, including "directed panspermia".... i.e. he thinks aliens seeded the earth with life
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Rhawn_Joseph
I don't know what to make of it really. Some of their evidence seems compelling, perhaps not of "mushrooms", but of something odd happening on the surface. Also, some of their interpretations of what they see in the photos appears to suffer from some confirmation bias... mushroom stalks for example. Id like to see the provenance of the photographs they claim have been taken by Opportunity, Curiosity and HiRise.
Of course, things growing and changing with seasons doesn't necessarily mean life... crystals for example are entirely mineral in nature and their growth is known to be seasonally affected. Could fungi grow in perchlorate-rich soils? It doesn't seem likely, and I don't know enough about the subject to offer a firm opinion.
I wonder if this is a case where peer review has a problem. I'm guessing that all the peers who review that particular journal are microbiologists. I wonder what geologists are saying about the photos.
The thing here is, while it is likely that their conclusions are wrong, its difficult to deny that they have evidence of something going on. These spheres do seemingly appear out of nowhere, and then grow in size - this seems on its face to be observable fact - and reapeatedly so, and for this reason, it should not be dismissed out of hand.
Is there any overlap between the "their" that came to crackpot conclusion and the "they" that actually accumulated the evidence?The thing here is, while it is likely that their conclusions are wrong, its difficult to deny that they have evidence of something going on.
Fungi have certain requirements for growth, including oxygen, water, a certain temperature range and a substrate with adequate organic material. The claims in the article can - and should - be dismissed out of hand by anybody with the slightest knowledge of biology.
Could you quote the link you used? I came up with a paper that has some overlap of authors but not the same as yours.Regardless, you can download the entire 67 page document from Research Gate (link in Gord's post earlier)
Fungi have certain requirements for growth, including oxygen, water, a certain temperature range and a substrate with adequate organic material. The claims in the article can - and should - be dismissed out of hand by anybody with the slightest knowledge of biology.
Could you quote the link you used? I came up with a paper that has some overlap of authors but not the same as yours.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...of_Growth_and_Behavior_From_Sequential_Images
Is there any overlap between the "their" that came to crackpot conclusion and the "they" that actually accumulated the evidence?
Got it. That works. Same authors, just slightly different presentation of their names and titles.Its in the link you just posted in on the right hand side (Download full text PDF). I know it takes you to a "Join" page, but it still automatically downloaded for me without having to join. Let me know if it works... if it doesn't I will post a share link to it in my Dropbox.
Any idea what the ambient temperature was at any of the sites this claimed fungus was found?
Summary:
Scientists have long assumed that fungi exist mainly to decompose matter into chemicals that other organisms can then use. But researchers have now found evidence that fungi possess a previously undiscovered talent with profound implications: The ability to use radioactivity as an energy source for making food and spurring their growth....
"The fungal kingdom comprises more species than any other plant or animal kingdom, so finding that they're making food in addition to breaking it down means that Earth's energetics--in particular, the amount of radiation energy being converted to biological energy--may need to be recalculated," says Dr. Arturo Casadevall, chair of microbiology & immunology at Einstein and senior author of the study, published May 23 in PLoS ONE.
NASA’s Curiosity rover has found new evidence preserved in rocks on Mars that suggests the planet could have supported ancient life, as well as new evidence in the Martian atmosphere that relates to the search for current life on the Red Planet. While not necessarily evidence of life itself, these findings are a good sign for future missions exploring the planet’s surface and subsurface.
The new findings – “tough” organic molecules in three-billion-year-old sedimentary rocks near the surface, as well as seasonal variations in the levels of methane in the atmosphere – appear in the June 8 edition of the journal Science.
The new findings -- “tough” organic molecules in 3-billion-year-old sedimentary rocks near the surface, as well as seasonal variations in the levels of methane in the atmosphere -- appear in the June 8 edition of the journal Science.
Organic molecules contain carbon and hydrogen, and also may include oxygen, nitrogen and other elements. While commonly associated with life, organic molecules also can be created by non-biological processes and are not necessarily indicators of life.
"It's life Jim, but not as we know it".More NASA Mars reports...While commonly associated with life, organic molecules also can be created by non-biological processes and are not necessarily indicators of life.
"It's life Jim, but not as we know it".