• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jeremy Bamber


What ever the NZer might say or not say is irrelevant, now the crime scene rules as it should always have done if understood, backed up by evidence previously locked away for 30 years according to the article.
 
This is exactly not wild unsupported speculation.
Holly Goodhead is an admin on the Bamber red forum and did heavy lifting to prove with bullet casings , trajectories precisely how Sheila Caffel killed her family.

Link, please?
 
Link, please?

This was delivered in close detail on Injustice Anywhere forum over hundreds of posts.
The forum has disappeared but owned by Bruce Fisher who is a member here.

People who claim Bamber did this crime are a mob of tiresome idiots and should deliver their reconstruction.
 
Last edited:
This was delivered in close detail on Injustice Anywhere forum over hundreds of posts.
The forum has disappeared but owned by Bruce Fisher who is a member here.

People who claim Bamber did this crime are a mob of tiresome idiots and should deliver their reconstruction.
And yet neither you nor anyone else have actually provided, or demonstrated the existence of, your claimed reconstruction showing, as you claim, "precisely how Sheila Caffel killed her family".
:rolleyes:
FFS you can't even manage to spell the poor woman's name correctly.
 
And yet neither you nor anyone else have actually provided, or demonstrated the existence of, your claimed reconstruction showing, as you claim, "precisely how Sheila Caffel killed her family".
:rolleyes:
FFS you can't even manage to spell the poor woman's name correctly.

Mass killer and poor woman. Driven by drugs and madness and the fatal belief that a christian mother can tend to the family without screwing the odds.
 
Mass killer and poor woman. Driven by drugs and madness and the fatal belief that a christian mother can tend to the family without screwing the odds.
So no evidence for your assertions. Again.
:rolleyes:
 
Watched the Channel 5 "White House Farm Murders: The New Evidence".

The police log entry about movement in the house, whilst Bamber was with the police outside. The other log entry about where the bodies were when the armed police entered. The search log entry showing no trace of a silencer in the cupboard. The DNA results for the silencer. The mark on the red fireplace that does not show in the initial crime scene photos. The two calls to the police by Bamber and his father.

If all of that had been disclosed to the jury during the trial, there is no way they would have convicted Bamber.
 
Watched the Channel 5 "White House Farm Murders: The New Evidence".

The police log entry about movement in the house, whilst Bamber was with the police outside. The other log entry about where the bodies were when the armed police entered. The search log entry showing no trace of a silencer in the cupboard. The DNA results for the silencer. The mark on the red fireplace that does not show in the initial crime scene photos. The two calls to the police by Bamber and his father.

If all of that had been disclosed to the jury during the trial, there is no way they would have convicted Bamber.
The scratch under the mantle is alleged to have occured accidentally during a struggle between Bamber and his father.
It was either this or a planting of evidence, and that was either the police or the relatives or both in a conspiracy.

Of course to call any of this new evidence is a travesty of the use of the word new. There is so much criminality in this case that has nothing to do with Jeremy Bamber the people of England are all complicit in ignoring the obvious. Unfortunately this happens everywhere all the time.
 
Last edited:
Watched the Channel 5 "White House Farm Murders: The New Evidence".

The police log entry about movement in the house, whilst Bamber was with the police outside. The other log entry about where the bodies were when the armed police entered. The search log entry showing no trace of a silencer in the cupboard. The DNA results for the silencer. The mark on the red fireplace that does not show in the initial crime scene photos. The two calls to the police by Bamber and his father.

If all of that had been disclosed to the jury during the trial, there is no way they would have convicted Bamber.

this has all been done to death in the thread already.
 
Watched the Channel 5 "White House Farm Murders: The New Evidence".

The police log entry about movement in the house, whilst Bamber was with the police outside. The other log entry about where the bodies were when the armed police entered. The search log entry showing no trace of a silencer in the cupboard. The DNA results for the silencer. The mark on the red fireplace that does not show in the initial crime scene photos. The two calls to the police by Bamber and his father.

If all of that had been disclosed to the jury during the trial, there is no way they would have convicted Bamber.

Exactly Nessie. Can include barrel induction to that, the scenario on the stairs showing a turn away from gunfire by Nevil. It shapes as one of the worst cases ever.
 
Where it stops, no-one knows....

Well, when Bamber dies in prison there will be a minor halt, but I'm sure his fanboys won't allow that to stop them.

He won't. Anne Eaton will sucumb in the bespoke cell for the most evil to be "in my court room".
 

Back
Top Bottom