I don't think space is expanding.

Status
Not open for further replies.
hecd2 said:
Nobody has any idea what your idea is here or what you think you are illustrating. What is the point of putting this up without any explanation of what it is you think you are doing? Are you afraid of having your inevitable errors exposed again?
Click to expand...

The only change I made is each photon has its own clock, running at half speed since the photons are redshifted z=1.

It's motion is based on that clock, and the dials run on that clock speed.

When a photon hits the mirror, it's clock speed resets to 1.

That sweet wave effect happens and the light reflects the way I said it would.
 
Ziggurat said:
That's not how it works. That isn't how it ever could work. It makes no sense at all.

And those aren't supposed to be clock hands anyways.
Click to expand...

I know. That's more of an odometer modulo wavelength.

In any case, photon's need clocks.

The hypothesis is no longer falsified by observation. It's just incongruent with your assumed premises.
 
Mike Helland said:
I know. That's more of an odometer modulo wavelength.

In any case, photon's need clocks.
Click to expand...

No. This is exactly wrong. Photons cannot have clocks.

The hypothesis is no longer falsified by observation. It's just incongruent with your assumed premises.
Click to expand...

These aren't assumed premises. You're just so god-damn ignorant of physics you don't understand why nothing you are saying is even remotely plausible.
 
Ziggurat said:
No. This is exactly wrong. Photons cannot have clocks.



These aren't assumed premises. You're just so god-damn ignorant of physics you don't understand why nothing you are saying is even remotely plausible.
Click to expand...

Why there is no theorry of everything?

Because Einstein was right only half way.

Time is relative 😃

Yes 😃

But also size / volume is relative.

And this is thing what Einstein could not understand.

Of course expanding photons energy / pushing force have entropy / time all a time 😃

Space dont have 😃


😃
 
Pixie of key said:
Do you know somebody who knows Jim Carrey?

If, lets tell her / him about that video 😃

https://youtu.be/hGtJ4lTbLjI

Expanding space is naked empire 😃

😃
Click to expand...

Actually, this is a good point. Mike, you should take some time to compare notes with Pixie. They probably have some valuable insights. You two could collaborate to refine your theory and iron out the kinks.
 
theprestige said:
Actually, this is a good point. Mike, you should take some time to compare notes with Pixie. They probably have some valuable insights. You two could collaborate to refine your theory and iron out the kinks.
Click to expand...
Pixie and Mike get summoned to Stockholm.
 
theprestige said:
See what I mean? They're improving your model already!
Click to expand...

I REALLY hope so 😃

I am savolainen and we like to enjoy with all things 😃

Älä laakase, naatitaan. Dont hit yet, lets enjoying a moment or two 😃

But i already enjoying with that thing many times.

I hope i can enjoy later some other things 😃

😃
 
Ziggurat said:
No. This is exactly wrong. Photons cannot have clocks.
Click to expand...

By that same reasoning, the photons travel no distance, but they do in the Feynman path integrals.

If I understand right, the time and space components of a photon's path through spacetime are equal, so it doesn't travel distance in spacetime and always has a proper time of 0. (editted out "doesn't")

Is that correct?
 
Last edited:
Mike Helland said:
By that same reasoning, the photons travel no distance, but they do in the Feynman path integrals.

If I understand right, the time and space components of a photon's path through spacetime are equal, so it doesn't travel distance in spacetime and doesn't always has a proper time of 0.

Is that correct?
Click to expand...

Forget space and lets explain everything what is "in" space, moving "in" space and changing " in" space 😃

😃

It is not spacetime!!!

It is expanding mattertime 😃


https://youtu.be/CfQFH--9dVI


And i am the One 😃

😃
 
Mike Helland said:
The only change I made is each photon has its own clock, running at half speed since the photons are redshifted z=1.

It's motion is based on that clock, and the dials run on that clock speed.

When a photon hits the mirror, it's clock speed resets to 1.

That sweet wave effect happens and the light reflects the way I said it would.
Click to expand...
So leaving aside all the ignorant guff about photons having their own clocks (what a complete crock that is), all you are modelling here is “light” arriving at a speed less than the speed of light and the speed going to the speed of light and the frequency going up by the same ratio (so the wavelength doesn’t change) on reflection. I put “light” in quotes because we know light doesn’t behave like this. Why would the frequency and speed of light change on reflection? I think this idea has already been debunked on this thread.
 
hecd2 said:
So leaving aside all the ignorant guff about photons having their own clocks (what a complete crock that is)
Click to expand...

The photons already have odometers in the Feynman solution. I'm just adding clocks, and not in a relativistic way.

To do this in relativity, the photon should have a norm velocity of c - c / (1+D/H)2.

It experiences proper time just really slowly (H=25 billion light years)


all you are modelling here is “light” arriving at a speed less than the speed of light and the speed going to the speed of light and the frequency going up by the same ratio (so the wavelength doesn’t change) on reflection.
Click to expand...

The wavelength is changing from 250 nm to 500 nm in that specific example.

The energy of the photon (frequency) should be constant throughout.
 
Mike Helland said:
The photons already have odometers in the Feynman solution. I'm just adding clocks, and not in a relativistic way.

To do this in relativity, the photon should have a norm velocity of c - c / (1+D/H)2.

It experiences proper time just really slowly (H=25 billion light years)
Click to expand...
Complete and utter rubbish. I told you that that diagram is a cartoon to demonstrate a principle and here you are thinking you are calculating path integrals. Not only are you not doing so, but you don’t have the mathematical ability to even understand how to begin. As for the rest of this, you also have no idea about relativity, proper time or any other aspect of physics. Open your mouth and pure nonsense pours out.
The wavelength is changing from 250 nm to 500 nm in that specific example.

The energy of the photon (frequency) should be constant throughout.
Click to expand...
And yet more nonsense. You don’t even know what your own little model shows. The wavelength is constant on reflection and the speed changes and therefore...? You can surely answer that question after a gazillion posts correcting your schoolboy errors. And you think you can revolutionise physics - the arrogance and ignorance on display is astonishing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom