Cont: Qanon Conspiracy Theories Part Two

Status
Not open for further replies.
The point is that you [snip] allow scum like that to literally form your reality, regardless of what you could know about them. And then you whine when people point at them with monstrosities that can't be proven, while denying the ones that can. Everybody who invites Anderson Cooper into their living room after stuff like "Syrian Danny" is a victim and should shut the **** up on the internet, let alone pretend to be a "Skeptic".

I think you're real problem is that we aren't letting you inform our realty. And when we point out how bad your arguments are, you get angry and call us "freaks", because you really really want to establish just how intellectually superior to us you are and have us validate that opinion.

The funny thing is I don't even watch CNN.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited quote
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point is that you [snip] allow scum like that to literally form your reality, regardless of what you could know about them. And then you whine when people point at them with monstrosities that can't be proven, while denying the ones that can. Everybody who invites Anderson Cooper into their living room after stuff like "Syrian Danny" is a victim and should shut the **** up on the internet, let alone pretend to be a "Skeptic".

Whoa! I sense a little misplaced anger here. Perhaps it is your "reality" that is a little off kilter if you think that baby eating is a realistic possibility merely because there is no proof to the contrary. There are people who can help with that.

Now, tell us details of a "monstrosity" about Anderson Cooper that can be proven. And no, being a student intern at the CIA does not qualify.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove rule breaches in quote
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you're real problem is that we aren't letting you inform our realty. And when we point out how bad your arguments are, you get angry and call us "freaks", because you really really want to establish just how intellectually superior to us you are and have us validate that opinion.

The funny thing is I don't even watch CNN.

I think not. :D

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove rule 12 breach
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point is that you [snip] allow scum like that to literally form your reality, regardless of what you could know about them. And then you whine when people point at them with monstrosities that can't be proven, while denying the ones that can. Everybody who invites Anderson Cooper into their living room after stuff like "Syrian Danny" is a victim and should shut the **** up on the internet, let alone pretend to be a "Skeptic".

[snip]
“scum”

Come on, tell us how you really feel.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited quote and response to breaches therein
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point is that you [snip] allow scum like that to literally form your reality, regardless of what you could know about them.

Our reality isn't "informed" by a single source.

And what makes Cooper scum? Is it because he comes from a wealthy family? Is it because he's gay, but doesn't play the victim card?

And then you whine when people point at them with monstrosities that can't be proven, while denying the ones that can.

List Cooper's monstrosities, please.

Here's the thing, I can say with 100% certainty that Cooper has never eaten a baby. I can say this because I am a citizen of the real world, and not some fascist paranoid construct as you want to live in.

If you new anything of substance about the CIA then you'd know Cooper could not have become a CIA Officer nor Analyst in the 1980s because it was illegal for Homosexuals to have security clearances. Nobody at CIA would have associated with him even on a casual level out of fear of Internal Affairs putting them through the ringer to make sure they were not also gay.

And the CIA are the good guys. I know this bugs people like you because it's true.


Everybody who invites Anderson Cooper into their living room after stuff like "Syrian Danny" is a victim and should shut the **** up on the internet, let alone pretend to be a "Skeptic".

Why, because we refused to be cowed by Russian and Baathist propoganda?

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited quote to remove breaches
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saw this on Facebook today.

4a8c3cd6896ff8081d49f7a46b4ec2f8.jpg
 
Saw this on Facebook today.

[qimg]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210201/4a8c3cd6896ff8081d49f7a46b4ec2f8.jpg[/qimg]
Why would she want to admit it?

Can anyone explain why, in the world view of CTs and other assorted nuts, the hidden organisations that run this world feel compelled to keep dropping hints?
 
Why would she want to admit it?

Can anyone explain why, in the world view of CTs and other assorted nuts, the hidden organisations that run this world feel compelled to keep dropping hints?

It is important that the CT's and assorted nuts be fed just enough misinfo to keep them occupied. If they are distracted by following celebrities who are "in on it" it will never occur to them that the real NWO is made up of people (or maybe lizards) they have never heard of. The celebs are well compensated for following these scripts, our controllers remain incognito, and the CT's are happily deceived. It's a win, win, win!
 
The point is that you [snip] allow scum like that to literally form your reality, regardless of what you could know about them. And then you whine when people point at them with monstrosities that can't be proven, while denying the ones that can. Everybody who invites Anderson Cooper into their living room after stuff like "Syrian Danny" is a victim and should shut the **** up on the internet, let alone pretend to be a "Skeptic".
:rolleyes:
As opposed to unquestioningly lapping up and regurgitating the latest Putinist propaganda?
:rolleyes:

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited quote to remove breaches
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why would she want to admit it?

Can anyone explain why, in the world view of CTs and other assorted nuts, the hidden organisations that run this world feel compelled to keep dropping hints?


Because that is their justification for doing what they do. Leaving hints proves that the unwashed masses are too dumb to rule themselves, because it's so straight in their faces.

That's the answer to your question, which doesn't mean that I believe that the hint-leaving and/or the inability to rule themselves is true.
 
QAnon makes Scientology look like the Unitarians.
thunderf00t pulled out what I figure is an old meme last week for his vid on social media and crazy... "Scientology, making Mormons look sane since 1952."

The Co$ should thank QAnon for returning the favor. [emoji1]
 
Last edited:
Because that is their justification for doing what they do. Leaving hints proves that the unwashed masses are too dumb to rule themselves, because it's so straight in their faces.

This is really dumb.
More realistically some people are very good at teaching themselves to find "hints" out of noise and static.
The QAnon people did very well at that game creating complete nonsense that failed to match reality then making up more nonsense to explain the failure.
 
thunderf00t pulled out what I figure is an old meme last week for his vid on social media and crazy... "Scientology, making Mormons look sane since 1952."

The Co$ should thank QAnon for returning the favor. [emoji1]

Unfortunately QAnon are way more worrying than the Co$.
I'm seeing a lot of them being currently distraught that the US does not have a military dictatorship in power now.
And there are a lot more of them than there has ever been Co$ members.
 
Because that is their justification for doing what they do. Leaving hints proves that the unwashed masses are too dumb to rule themselves, because it's so straight in their faces.

What nonsense. Conspiracism is a mental problem. Some people believe crazy made-up things for the cheap and false gratification of "special knowledge". Their precious CTs are all BS. QAnon is remarkable only in being more painfully and consistently stupid than usual.
 
This is really dumb.
More realistically some people are very good at teaching themselves to find "hints" out of noise and static.
The QAnon people did very well at that game creating complete nonsense that failed to match reality then making up more nonsense to explain the failure.

A sort of intellectual pareidolia? ;)
 
Because that is their justification for doing what they do. Leaving hints proves that the unwashed masses are too dumb to rule themselves, because it's so straight in their faces.

That's the answer to your question, which doesn't mean that I believe that the hint-leaving and/or the inability to rule themselves is true.

So they really, really want to establish just how intellectually superior to the hoi polloi they are, but there's a rarified intellectual elite too clever to be fooled.

I'm starting to see a connection here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom