The large majority of Biden voters, likely... much as the concern is fairly certainly far more along the lines of Justice, which would likely be the generally preferred option. Impeachment serves a different role, albeit also one of value.
Just to expand on this a little-
Some in the GOP are arguing that you can only impeach and convict a sitting President, on the ground that it's ridiculous, or "moot," to remove a President who is already out of office. This argument rests on two suppositions- that the penalty is the only reason for the process, and that removal is the only penalty.
But if a bank president has embezzled funds from his bank, then resigned after being caught, he can still be prosecuted and convicted for what he did, because
it was against the damn law. To me, it's as frankly ridiculous to say that a US President can escape any consequences for having committed a "high crime" when he was in a position to do so just because he's no longer in that position, as to allow the bank president to escape
his due penalty for having embezzled when he could just because he no longer can. In either case, the point is the wrong committed, not just the penalty for it. (And, no, the distinction between "legal" and "political" doesn't affect that central point of the analogy)
And, of course, the removal from office isn't the only penalty possible. Article I, Section 3 of the US Constitution, says "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office,
and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor." So, even though that prescribed penalty isn't the
reason for an impeachment, but a practical effect that follows as a result of the process, it can apply to
anyone who can potentially deserve the penalty- whether they presently can is irrelevant.
