Ed Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some HCQ numbers from https://hcqmeta.com


HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 195 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 1 quadrillion (p = 0.0000000000000009).

•Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of studies reporting a positive effect and an estimated reduction of 67% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.33 [0.25-0.43].

•91% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.0059.

•There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 88% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 75% of retrospective studies do.

•Studies from North America are 4.0 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.00000005.

Show forest plot for:
All studies
Mortality results
With exclusions
RCTs

Total 195 studies 3,074 authors 166,999 patients
Positive effects 152 studies 2,394 authors 123,307 patients
Early treatment 67% improvement RR 0.33 [0.25-0.43]
Late treatment 25% improvement RR 0.75 [0.69-0.81]



https://hcqmeta.com
 
W.H.O said:
Current data shows that this drug does not reduce deaths among hospitalised COVID-19 patients, nor help people with moderate disease.

HQC has never been shown to be effective in treating COVID-19 in blinded placebo-controlled studies.
Fauci, et al.
 
Dont forget

Its not a vaccine.

The biological agent (synthetic pathogen) wrongly termed a vaccine is not proven to stop the transmission of covid...not even tested for that, among other things
 
Dont forget

Its not a vaccine.

The biological agent (synthetic pathogen) wrongly termed a vaccine is not proven to stop the transmission of covid...not even tested for that, among other things

Amazing, every word of what you said was wrong.
 
Survival rates for people not taking HCQ

Survival rates for covid positive people that did not take HCQ before or after testing positive...


Under age 20: 99.997%

age 20-49: 99.98@

age 50-69: 99.5%

age over 70yrs: 95%
 
HQC has never been shown to be effective in treating COVID-19 in blinded placebo-controlled studies.



True....

As intended, the fraudulent and lethal (overdoses) HCQ studies published and retracted by Lancet killed the HCQ testing last year.


HCQ is cheap, safe, and proven effective in 150 studies.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/gN7D...q7djqTmbXzV3VCewwgeQYGps7GJ3sUCLuSnkKqX8a-WK8


Until we have gold standard studies, dont you think thousands of doctors agreeing, and positive odds of one in six trillion will suffice for allowing people to access a cheap medicine proven safe over 75 years of weekly use for Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis....?
In tropical countries they take it all the time...no problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVF2lxtZOIg&feature=emb_logo
 
Last edited:
Yes.

HCQ is cheap, safe, and proven effective in 150 studies.
For treatment of malaria.


Until we have gold standard studies, dont you think thousands of doctors agreeing . . .

Doctors aren't researchers as such. As soon as we apply properly controlled, placebo-controlled, gold-standard testing to HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19, and it is shown to be safe and effective, that is when we can rationally and reasonably claim such, not before, no matter what some doctors are saying, nor how many are saying it.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Not wrong; YouTube video rejected. Peer-reviewed study published in a bona fide, respected medical journal required.

Also this:

When you have that, let us know.



Meanwhile, wiser doctors save lives with harmless cheap HCQ, and people who take it regularly in tropics suffer les with covid.

Who benefits by suppressing it?
 
Meanwhile . . .

We wait until it's been shown to be safe and effective.

As to anyone "surpressing" it, conspiracies are not evidence. They are claims, so yeah, CANE again.

. . . wiser doctors save lives with harmless cheap HCQ, and people who take it regularly in tropics suffer les with covid.
Also CANE.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, wiser doctors save lives with harmless cheap HCQ, and people who take it regularly in tropics suffer les with covid.

Who benefits by suppressing it?

If hydroxychloroquine worked the way you think it does, then it would be used as a standard treatment. It's not, though, because it didn't prove to be effective in trials.

Didn't conspiracists make up some weird guff about why it was being suppressed? Oh, microchips in the vaccines I think it was. It's hard to keep track of all that nutty stuff.
 
If hydroxychloroquine worked the way you think it does, then it would be used as a standard treatment. It's not, though, because it didn't prove to be effective in trials.

Didn't conspiracists make up some weird guff about why it was being suppressed? Oh, microchips in the vaccines I think it was. It's hard to keep track of all that nutty stuff.

It's all just sickening crap, causing confusion amidst a pandemic, making things worse.
 
Suppression?

NBC: Dr. Anthony Fauci says he feels liberated to speak freely about science, risk of Covid under Biden

"It was very clear that there were things said, be it regarding things like*hydroxychloroquine*and other things like that, that really was uncomfortable because they were not based in scientific fact," Fauci told reporters, speaking about the Trump administration.

"The idea that you can get up and talk about what you know, what the evidence is, what the science is," Fauci continued, "it is somewhat of a liberating feeling."

It was the truth that got suppressed by powerful people abusing their positions.

As usual, CTer is totally blind to the actual corruption and subversion they supposedly dislike so much.
 
Forget hydroxychloroquine; injecting bleach into your body is the way to fight Covid. Amazed Bubba , in his devotion to Dear Leader, has not pointed that out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom