Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hans said:
The only possible explanation is that Q is looking forward to the 2024 election and Trumps 2nd term. All those thing will happen THEN.

Simples that gives T-rectum eight years to accomplish it all.
Click to expand...

And it must be made clear that, should Trump appear within the next four years to die from choking on a KFC drumstick while playing Fruit Ninja on the toilet, this is all part of the plan, and is a clever ruse to lull his really, really dumb enemies into a false sense of security so that he can walk into the Senate chamber if triumph with all the damning evidence obtained from Nancy Pelosi's laptop.
 
From the D.C. Police Department:

“Officer Fanone suffered a mild heart attack when we was repeatedly beaten & tased by his attackers during the Jan 6th insurrection. We need your help finding them!!

Have info? Call the FBI’s Tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324)
@FBIWFO”

This was the result of loser Donald Trump vomiting out his insane lies about the election, his quislings supporting and regurgitating them, and the chuckleheads and goose-steppers in his cult lapping up and acting on them. But there’s also a portion of blame for the anonymous cowards who simply repeat these lies in various forums, contributing to this cesspool of anti-American lunacy.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Not quite.

Their 'policing' is a joke. Their reasons for censoring are mostly lies 'for the safety of the community' This about fairness. The socials censoring is 100% politicized, but claiming they are not.


I can only conclude you're either unaware of the hypocrisy and double standards social media apply to voices they dislike, or that you approve of it, which of course is the case as their censorship targeted the election, 100%
Click to expand...

I couldn't care less who they target. There isn't anything stopping anyone from starting their own copy of Twitter, Facebook or whatever. It's not as if the big players on that side of the fence are short of cash.
 
Last edited:
RolandRat said:
I couldn't care less who they target. There isn't anything stopping anyone from starting their own copy of Twitter, Facebook or whatever. It's not as if the big players on that side of the fence are short of cash.
Click to expand...

I thought these guys claimed to be all horny for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship. So go ahead and entrepreneur up an Alt right, conspiracy friendly platform. And quit whining already.
 
Bubba said:
Not quite.

Their 'policing' is a joke. Their reasons for censoring are mostly lies 'for the safety of the community' This about fairness. The socials censoring is 100% politicized, but claiming they are not.

I can only conclude you're either unaware of the hypocrisy and double standards social media apply to voices they dislike, or that you approve of it, which of course is the case as their censorship targeted the election, 100%
Click to expand...

Most of the "conservative voices" being silenced are Russian bots.
 
RolandRat said:
I couldn't care less who they target. There isn't anything stopping anyone from starting their own copy of Twitter, Facebook or whatever. It's not as if the big players on that side of the fence are short of cash.
Click to expand...



True,

Parler is one. Then Apple and Amazon essentially removed Parler from the internet.

I think they are getting back on now.

The others swayed the vote by censoring voices they dislike for bogus reasons
 
Last edited:
RolandRat said:
I couldn't care less who they target. There isn't anything stopping anyone from starting their own copy of Twitter, Facebook or whatever. It's not as if the big players on that side of the fence are short of cash.
Click to expand...

There actually is. The same things that caused problems for Parler. Even moreso now that Amazon, as the hoster, is already getting a bad rap for having knowingly let Parler's crap slide. Haven't looked into that enough to see whether they might face legal action, for that matter.

eerok said:
Most of the "conservative voices" being silenced are Russian bots.
Click to expand...

I'll poke at something in response to that... voter purges. As long as "conservatives" just keep denying large numbers of Democrats their actually constitutional right to vote by wrongfully purging them from the voting rolls (especially when it's clearly done intentionally), I don't think that I'll have much sympathy for the complaints of "conservatives" who get caught up in attempts to purge Russian (and other countries') disinformation agents and bots about how their mangling of the 1st Amendment "rights" are being violated.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Duh.

If I am wrong about it, I'd admit it.
Click to expand...

You've been wrong non-stop. Since running away with your tail between your legs, then returning a week later as if nothing happened isn't "admitting you were wrong", I don't see any evidence for the highlighted.
 
Bubba said:
Explain how it is not possible, if not likely, that an East Coast Elite college kid, after becoming a cia intern, is invited to stay on as a 'plainclothes' agent.
Click to expand...

Because that's not how it works. Because it is illegal for the CIA to conduct operations within CONUS. Because there is no such thing as CIA "Agents" (CIA operatives are called "Officers". This is how you spot people who don't do their homework).

Nothing in Cooper's post college career suggests CIA, plus you couldn't be a homosexual and hold a security clearance until 1995.

It is no secret that the CIA and other government agenies will reach out to journalists, newspaper editors, and media heads to ask for help with influence.

We know that Julia Childs and a few A-list hollywood actors were recruited by US intelligence. Those are just the ones we know of.
Click to expand...

No, Julia Childs worked for the OSS, not the CIA. She volunteered to SERVE HER COUNTRY in WWII by working at OSS because she was too tall to serve in the military (she was 6'2"). This is where she met her husband, Paul Childs, who was (GASP!) also an OSS Officer.

Smart people can read about her work here:

https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/julia-child-cooking-up-spy-ops-for-oss/

Child's most nefarious contribution for the OSS was Shark Repellent:

https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/julia-child-and-the-oss-recipe-for-shark-repellent/

Sterling Hayden, the guy who played General Jack D Ripper in Dr. Stangelove, was OSS and kind of a badass. Also a badass, Christopher Lee, although not CIA but British, worked for black ops.

What's your point?

Why aren't you more concerned with the KGB/FSA's possible influences in western media post WWII?

Elites and celebrities are more useful in many ways...access to higher levels where info can be gathered. I do not believe this needs explaining.
Click to expand...

No, they are really not.

Useful people are those who are working in agencies, businesses, government offices, and industrial corporations who manufacture and maintain the apparatus supporting national security of our adversaries. That's is coincidentally who the CIA and every other intelligence service in the world targets.

I cannot believe you dont get it, so I can only think that you are intentionally being obtuse.
Click to expand...

Sort of like a fish not being able to breathe air, we can't lower our IQs that far.
 
smartcooky said:
Nope.

Everyone in America can communicate as freely as they like with whomever they like, and Big Tech cannot stop them. They can use a telephone, or a smartphone. They can use email, or WhatsApp, or Messenger or Viber. If they want to communicate to a wider range of like-minded people they can use email lists, or multi-messaging or go old school and publish a newsletter.
Click to expand...

They can employ the massive right-wing, world-wide wealth to start-up their own server farms to service their own YT, FB and Twitter applications. No one is stopping these confederate Nazis from communicating on the internet. Of course, victims of violence have the right to sue these new social media companies for providing a platform for violent criminals, but that goes with the territory.

Craigslist is a massive communication pillar of the internet. Are they obligated to accept ads they find irresponsibly dangerous? What about match.com?
 
This case is not about suppressing speech or stifling viewpoints. It is not about a
conspiracy to restrain trade. Instead, this case is about Parler’s demonstrated unwillingness and
inability to remove from the servers of Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) content that threatens
the public safety, such as by inciting and planning the rape, torture, and assassination of named
public officials and private citizens.
Click to expand...

Exactly right. Amazon isn't obligated to host Nazi material on their servers. Let this filth use their own resources.
 
RolandRat said:
I couldn't care less who they target. There isn't anything stopping anyone from starting their own copy of Twitter, Facebook or whatever. It's not as if the big players on that side of the fence are short of cash.
Click to expand...

Apart from we saw what happened to Parler.

Good discussion of what you would need to do if you want to create a truly
'independent' platform.

On a shooting channel but Karl is always worth listening to.

He made this at the end of one of his usual shooting vids in the wake of the DC riots and subsequent death of parler

 
On one of these threads I wrote that Trump wouldn’t be leaving on Air Force One (well, one of the VC-25As familiar as AF1). Not correct.

Because he’s such a pathological narcissist, he’s apparently leaving D.C. early enough so that he’ll still be officially President and get a ride on the Big Airplane and then get a motorcade in the Big Cars to Mar-a-Lago, just to show what a big boy he is. Departing Presidents don’t usually waste taxpayer money so profligately on their way home, but using other people’s money to feed his ego is very on-brand for him.

Of course, the timing of this is because the Thumbsucker-in-Chief is too much of a crybaby to acknowledge that he lost the election, because that’s the kind of fragile little excuse for a man that he is. He’ll slink away to rage impotently as Biden is inaugurated, and have people tell him what a brave Big Boy he is.

What a loser. Can you imagine being suckered by such a flimsy grifter?
 
sts60 said:
On one of these threads I wrote that Trump wouldn’t be leaving on Air Force One (well, one of the VC-25As familiar as AF1). Not correct.

Because he’s such a pathological narcissist, he’s apparently leaving D.C. early enough so that he’ll still be officially President and get a ride on the Big Airplane and then get a motorcade in the Big Cars to Mar-a-Lago, just to show what a big boy he is. Departing Presidents don’t usually waste taxpayer money so profligately on their way home, but using other people’s money to feed his ego is very on-brand for him.

Of course, the timing of this is because the Thumbsucker-in-Chief is too much of a crybaby to acknowledge that he lost the election, because that’s the kind of fragile little excuse for a man that he is. He’ll slink away to rage impotently as Biden is inaugurated, and have people tell him what a brave Big Boy he is.

What a loser. Can you imagine being suckered by such a flimsy grifter?
Click to expand...

Those were bsically my thoughts as well, but on reflection, technically, I suppose he ought to take AF -1. He will still be the President until noon, and so he might have to deal with things that involve secure communication or even military orders and responses. The planes generally known as Air Force One are the best equipped for that sort of thing.

Of course, he could just, I don't know, hang out in DC until after noon, and then it wouldn't be an issue? Even if he didn't attend the inauguration he could stay in the White House until noon on the 20th, and then scoot away toaward private transportation. Nah, that would be too simple. That's where the thoughts in your post come back to my mind.

ETA: I looked up the only remotely similar situation I could think of, and saw that Nixon flew Air Force One to San Clemente when he resigned.
 
Last edited:
sts60 said:
On one of these threads I wrote that Trump wouldn’t be leaving on Air Force One (well, one of the VC-25As familiar as AF1). Not correct.

Because he’s such a pathological narcissist, he’s apparently leaving D.C. early enough so that he’ll still be officially President and get a ride on the Big Airplane and then get a motorcade in the Big Cars to Mar-a-Lago, just to show what a big boy he is. Departing Presidents don’t usually waste taxpayer money so profligately on their way home, but using other people’s money to feed his ego is very on-brand for him.

Of course, the timing of this is because the Thumbsucker-in-Chief is too much of a crybaby to acknowledge that he lost the election, because that’s the kind of fragile little excuse for a man that he is. He’ll slink away to rage impotently as Biden is inaugurated, and have people tell him what a brave Big Boy he is.

What a loser. Can you imagine being suckered by such a flimsy grifter?
Click to expand...
Bill Hemmer on Fox News asked Hogan Gidley, Diaper Don's former deputy press sec if Trump might be feeling a bit emasculated by his getting kicked to the curb and Gidley replied (not making this up) that the Diapered One is the most masculine person to every hold that position.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

Cowardly Bone Spurs, (ex) President ***** -His-Pants masculine?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom