kookbreaker
Evil Fokker
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2001
- Messages
- 15,933
Video doesn't play. Got a full link?
I must have messed it up. Hope this works.
https://youtu.be/XWPgjtuk724
Video doesn't play. Got a full link?
The GBI and GA state election investigators have investigated this! https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics...urveillance-video/T5M3PYIBYFHFFOD3CIB2ULDVDE/There you go again. Assuming criminal behavior from an election worker and ridiculing the notion that an election worker engaged in fraud would possibly crack under interrogation. In your mind is it possible that an election worker is not engaged in fraud and can prove it? Or that maybe an election worker isn't involved in fraud but simply made an error?
Although it's easy to understand why you wouldn't want any of the evidence adjudicated, what with your mindset and all.
Of course not. It's also about brown people, and poor people, andcommunistsliberals of all stripes. The one thing it's not about? Voter fraud.
This election is the most secure and the most scrutinized in our history. No significant voter fraud occurred. It is a non-issue. We all know this, so any anybody who purports to be concerned about 'voter fraud' is actually thinking of something else.
Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election fraud, election manipulation, voter fraud or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election, either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both.[1] It differs from but often goes hand-in-hand with voter suppression.
There you go again. Assuming criminal behavior from an election worker and ridiculing the notion that an election worker engaged in fraud would possibly crack under interrogation. In your mind is it possible that an election worker is not engaged in fraud and can prove it? Or that maybe an election worker isn't involved in fraud but simply made an error?
Although it's easy to understand why you wouldn't want any of the evidence adjudicated, what with your mindset and all.
There you go again. Assuming criminal behavior from an election worker and ridiculing the notion that an election worker engaged in fraud would possibly crack under interrogation. In your mind is it possible that an election worker is not engaged in fraud and can prove it? Or that maybe an election worker isn't involved in fraud but simply made an error?
Although it's easy to understand why you wouldn't want any of the evidence adjudicated, what with your mindset and all.
This is a truly puzzling line of argument. Puzzling in the sense of why you would think that it was in any way a valid line of argument. I had held myself back before, but I really am curious about why you would think such. Your whole argument here seems to rest on assuming inane premises about the person you are responding to and what they actually said, after all.
Prediction: These tweets will rapidly age.Trump tweets
Get smart Republicans. FIGHT!
Quote Tweet
Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain
Republicans confirmed Justice Barrett, which they had the clear, lawful right to do, and in response Chuck Schumer said "EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE NOW."
If that's the case, why shouldn't Republican legislators go to the wall for the President?
Dan Scavino
@DanScavino
WOW! We hear you from the West Wing—THANK YOU
Christina Bobb
@christina_bobb
Pennsylvania is going to Trump. The legislators have spoken.
No he can't.Trump Tweets
If Vice President @Mike_Pence comes through for us, we will win the Presidency. Many States want to decertify the mistake they made in certifying incorrect & even fraudulent numbers in a process NOT approved by their State Legislatures (which it must be). Mike can send it back!
Trump Tweets
If Vice President @Mike_Pence comes through for us, we will win the Presidency. Many States want to decertify the mistake they made in certifying incorrect & even fraudulent numbers in a process NOT approved by their State Legislatures (which it must be). Mike can send it back!
No he can't.
Trump Tweets
States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!
Trump Tweets
States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!
Trump Tweets
States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!
There you go again. Assuming criminal behavior from an election worker and ridiculing the notion that an election worker engaged in fraud would possibly crack under interrogation. In your mind is it possible that an election worker is not engaged in fraud and can prove it? Or that maybe an election worker isn't involved in fraud but simply made an error?
Although it's easy to understand why you wouldn't want any of the evidence adjudicated, what with your mindset and all.
I can almost see Trump tweeting that whilst Pence is in the same room....
Trump Tweets
Even Mexico uses Voter I.D.
The States want to redo their votes. They found out they voted on a FRAUD. Legislatures never approved. Let them do it. BE STRONG!
Trump Tweets
Even Mexico uses Voter I.D.
The States want to redo their votes. They found out they voted on a FRAUD. Legislatures never approved. Let them do it. BE STRONG!
He Diaper Don . . . it's OVAH!