• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
However, pulling cases of ballots from under table for processing after dismissing observers shortly before the (documented) spike of thousands of Biden votes does have legs.
Click to expand...

One wonders why it didn't have legs in Pennsylvania, except for because it's ********.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited for rule 10
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bubba said:
In the video the narrator claims the "2nd handoff" occurred when the guy raises his arms.

Raising his arms lifted his shirt clear of his trousers pocket.

The next claim is that she put something in his trouser pocket. That move is just barely visible.

Those are the claims I heard.

Whatever. No matter. The video assertion really has no legs anyway.

However, pulling cases of ballots from under table for processing after dismissing observers shortly before the (documented) spike of thousands of Biden votes does have legs.

Wednesday forecast: Stormy
Click to expand...

Bring your guns to D.C. on the 6th!
 
Norman Alexander said:
So even if a USB was handed surreptitiously, who is to say what it contained? Porn? Disney movies? A bunch of family photos? An illegally downloaded copy of Sia's latest album? Trump's missing tax returns? There is no proof whatsoever that this exceptionally mythical USB contained any material likely to affect the voting outcome in any way.

And having been handed over, where is the proof it was actually used to affect the voting outcome? Is there evidence this same USB was inserted into a voting tabulation system anywhere? And that the contents made any untoward change in the tallies? That suddenly there were hundreds of thousands of extra votes for Minny Mouse, or the reverse cowgirl position? No, there was not. (And damn! That cowgirl stuff needs to be up-voted! :D )

So even on the exceedingly unlikely possibility there was some secret exchange of a USB on camera in full public view, there is only a homeopathic probability it would have contained anything likely to swing the results.
Click to expand...

It's really a false flag operation. It must be -- because the Trumpster knows they are votes for Binden. How could he possibly know if he were not involved? :confused:
 
Bubba said:
In the video the narrator claims the "2nd handoff" occurred when the guy raises his arms.

Raising his arms lifted his shirt clear of his trousers pocket.

The next claim is that she put something in his trouser pocket. That move is just barely visible.

Those are the claims I heard.

Whatever. No matter. The video assertion really has no legs anyway.

However, pulling cases of ballots from under table for processing after dismissing observers shortly before the (documented) spike of thousands of Biden votes does have legs.

Wednesday forecast: Stormy
Click to expand...
Nope.
 
Bubba said:
Congress Approves Rules Regulating Jan. 6 Electoral Vote Count

https://www.theepochtimes.com/congr...dium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-01-04-2
Click to expand...

Pence, as president of the Senate, will open “all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes,” the rules state, a nod to how seven states sent so-called competing electors, or certificates for both Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and President Donald Trump, to Washington.den and President Donald Trump, to Washington.
Click to expand...

There is only one certified slate of electors for each state, and hence only one legal choice in every case, so they can nod themselves silly.
 
Bubba said:
Time will tell
Click to expand...

Done told.

306 - 232. Landslide.

Diaper Don done, defeated, dismissed and kicked to the curb by the votes and the voters and the courts ovah and ovah and OVAH!!


Also: Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
 
Last edited:
Norman Alexander said:
So even if a USB was handed surreptitiously, who is to say what it contained? Porn? Disney movies? A bunch of family photos? An illegally downloaded copy of Sia's latest album? Trump's missing tax returns? There is no proof whatsoever that this exceptionally mythical USB contained any material likely to affect the voting outcome in any way.

And having been handed over, where is the proof it was actually used to affect the voting outcome? Is there evidence this same USB was inserted into a voting tabulation system anywhere? And that the contents made any untoward change in the tallies? That suddenly there were hundreds of thousands of extra votes for Minny Mouse, or the reverse cowgirl position? No, there was not. (And damn! That cowgirl stuff needs to be up-voted! :D )

So even on the exceedingly unlikely possibility there was some secret exchange of a USB on camera in full public view, there is only a homeopathic probability it would have contained anything likely to swing the results.
Click to expand...


The thing you have to keep in mind that the people we are dealing with are, when all said and done, just ordinary old conspiracy theorists - they are mostly stupid, and they don't look or think beyond "this looks suspicious, odd, strange or does not appear how I expect it to". This is why we get

"This shadow doesn't look right" = entire Apollo programme faked

"This bullet casing doesn't look right" = JFK was assassinated by the {insert three-letter acronym here}

"This photo doesn't look right" = 9/11 was an inside job

"I can't see the curvature of the earth" = the Earth is flat

These idiots jump straight from "this looks odd" to their preferred, predisposed conclusion without any intervening evidence, and anything they do try to claim as evidence is just more "this looks odd" stuff. Actual evidence to the contrary is ignored or hand-waved away to preserve their delusional worldview.


.
 
smartcooky said:
The thing you have to keep in mind that the people we are dealing with are, when all said and done, just ordinary old conspiracy theorists - they are mostly stupid, and they don't look or think beyond "this looks suspicious, odd, strange or does not appear how I expect it to". This is why we get

"This shadow doesn't look right" = entire Apollo programme faked

"This bullet casing doesn't look right" = JFK was assassinated by the {insert three-letter acronym here}

"This photo doesn't look right" = 9/11 was an inside job

"I can't see the curvature of the earth" = the Earth is flat

These idiots jump straight from "this looks odd" to their preferred, predisposed conclusion without any intervening evidence, and anything they do try to claim as evidence is just more "this looks odd" stuff. Actual evidence to the contrary is ignored or hand-waved away to preserve their delusional worldview.


.
Click to expand...

Ding. Ding. Ding! You are correct, sir!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom