Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
Much more importantly: Why do you keep looking for possible anomalies when the election results have been rechecked repeatedly, and no systematic faults have been found? Why keep obsessing about "suspicious" actions when no evidence of fraud can be found? We are not talking about the odd slip, here. We are talking about tens of thousands of votes. Nobody can find any of them.
And there's a classic example going on in this thread right now. Georgia carried out a manual recount which gave the same result as the original machine count; this is conclusive proof that, if any fraudulent transfer of votes took place, it cannot have done so during the transfer of vote numbers from the counting machines to the master count. And yet a certain member is looking into a video that starts from the supposition that this already disproven form of electoral fraud took place, and posits a means by which it could have taken place. This is not about searching for genuine instances of fraud; it's about trying to spread a thin cloth of respectability over a construction of deliberate lies, in order to maintain the fiction that those who've chosen to believe it are operating in good faith. There is no way to end this sort of speculation, because its aim is to support a predetermined conclusion by whatever means, however dishonest, are to hand, and if that means slandering and endangering the life and liberty of someone whose only 'crime' was to participate in the democratic process, that's seen as an acceptable cost. Honesty is a pretence, not a prerequisite, in this search for electoral irregularities, so honest investigation will never quell it.
Dave