William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 27,665
Daily Mail has images of the RV with its lights on at 1:22am.
*tone* "This area must be evacuated now"oooh...that is creepy. Was it counting down? or always saying 15 minutes?
*tone* "This area must be evacuated now"
x3(?)
"If you can hear this message, evacuate now."
x3(?)
Repeat
A report I saw said that the building housed a "data center" for AT&T and the blast caused some AT&T cell service disruption, mostly limited to just the immediate Nashville area though.
That is what is captured in the few-seconds-long surveillance video, but I've seen reports indicating there was more to the message earlier, including a direct repeating statement that "There is a bomb".
For what it's worth, the news articles I'm seeing most lately quote the police as saying they heard "announcements coming from the vehicle" to the effect that a bomb might explode in 15 minutes. This is coupled with a police statement that right now it's unknown whether anyone was in the vehicle at the time it exploded; so while it's reasonable to assume that the "announcement" was a recording, for the time being there is at least a chance that it may not have been.
Either way, that's incredibly bizarre. Obviously someone who intends to kill people - or even lure first responders to a site in order to attack them specifically - isn't going to be broadcasting a warning that a bomb is about to go off. I suspect the bomb was likely intended to damage property to the exclusion of harming people.
Flights grounded at Nashville International Airport due to communications outage related to the explosion.
https://fox17.com/news/local/flight...-following-blast-explosion-bomb-tennessee-bna
I suppose if it were a different AT&T building (coastal handling main trunks), it could be considered a "Deep State" target due to association with NSA. In Tennessee, I don't think that argument would make sense.
Then again, these are folk to whom QAnon makes sense.
Looks bigger than that now. AT&T outages are now widespread across parts of Tenn and Kentucky; including 911 services and possibly AT&T owned services like DirectTV.
Law Enforcement is puzzled;this fits no MO and makes no sense as a major terrorist attack; it's like the perp wanted to avoid heavy casualties.
Yeah but disrupting telecoms isn't the same thing as "harmless" especially since most reasons someone would do it are as a casualty multiplier for another attack.
Sure it could be some lone nut who thinks the Democrats had a child sex dungeon or whatever, but if we move beyond "Lone nut" it doesn't leave a lot of motives that aren't almost as disturbing as "intentional loss of life."
Time will tell.
especially since most reasons someone would do it are as a casualty multiplier for another attack.
Yeah but disrupting telecoms isn't the same thing as "harmless" especially since most reasons someone would do it are as a casualty multiplier for another attack.
Sure it could be some lone nut who thinks the Democrats had a child sex dungeon or whatever, but if we move beyond "Lone nut" it doesn't leave a lot of motives that aren't almost as disturbing as "intentional loss of life."
Time will tell.
Some of the att equipment was running on emergency generators. Authorities ordered that the generators be shut down.Indeed I'm reading that now.
On one Nashville local news broadcast they just brought up the fact that it's interesting all of these outages and problems have developed in the hours after the explosion, rather than occurring immediately after the explosion and the physical damage it caused.
The vehicle will be traced back to an owner, or last known owner within a day. From there a chain of events can be constructed. The explosive will be identified and possibly back to a source.
Barring anyone taking credit for this the event will be traced back to someone fairly quickly.