Trump's Coup d'état.

Status
Not open for further replies.
He emotes to the same base impulses. A natural knack; humans are still the same species as during the stone age.
I don't see how that contradicts my feeling that he understands this crowd. Understanding emotionally doesn't preclude understanding intellectually.
 
There are people doxxing Georgia Republican officials they think are not loyal to Trump, showing their pictures in crosshairs and pics of their houses.

Has this been posted yet? If so it still needs to be bumped:

WA Times:Election officials, FBI director among targets shown in crosshairs in online 'Enemies' list
FBI Director Christopher A. Wray is among more than a dozen individuals accused of treason, a capital punishment, by whoever is running the recently launched “Enemies of the People” website.

Each person listed is depicted by an image showing their face under crosshairs alongside a reason for their inclusion. Several entries include the person’s addresses and a picture of their home.
 
When the "enemies of the people" outnumber "the people", by oh say, 7.5 million, wouldn't the roles reverse, and "the people" become the new, improved, "enemies of the people"?
 
When the "enemies of the people" outnumber "the people", by oh say, 7.5 million, wouldn't the roles reverse, and "the people" become the new, improved, "enemies of the people"?

It seems that, as Brecht once suggested in East Germany, the government has dissolved the people and elected a new one.

Dave
 
These are going to be 32 long days.
It will get worse ...

Also present at that meeting: A retired general who has been actively calling for the implementation of martial law.

Can someone get me up to speed on where we are with the whole coup thing? Are we still treating it like a joke?

Because the president conferring with former high-ranking military personnel who want to deploy troops in an effort to overturn a free and fair election has me splitting my sides with laughter.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was the 'libtards' that were supposed to be the ones promoting the violence. :rolleyes:

No, we’re supposed to only point it out when libtards do it.

The fact that the majority of violence comes from the right is something to be ignored.
 
Also, present at that meeting: A retired general who has been actively calling for the implementation of martial law.

Can someone get me up to speed on where we are with the whole coup thing? Are we still treating it like a joke?

Because the president conferring with former high-ranking military personnel who want to deploy troops in an effort to overturn a free and fair election has me splitting my sides with laughter.

I don't think Flynn has any particular meaning. He's just another talking head, and a notoriously stupid one at that. He doesn't represent the US military, which I'm sure is led by very pragmatic, reality-based people. They're not going to walk off a cliff on the orders of Trump.
 
Also present at that meeting: A retired general who has been actively calling for the implementation of martial law.

Can someone get me up to speed on where we are with the whole coup thing? Are we still treating it like a joke?

Because the president conferring with former high-ranking military personnel who want to deploy troops in an effort to overturn a free and fair election has me splitting my sides with laughter.

Not as a joke but highly unlikely.
If you mean Flynn by ex general, the Pentagon issued a formal denuciation of him and his statements yesterday. Anyway, a ex general has zero command authority.
But i suspect you don't like the US Military anyway.
 
I don't think Flynn has any particular meaning. He's just another talking head, and a notoriously stupid one at that. He doesn't represent the US military, which I'm sure is led by very pragmatic, reality-based people. They're not going to walk off a cliff on the orders of Trump.

I repeat, the Pentagon put out a formal statetment yesterday that pretty mch says Flynn is full of crap. He is pretty much in disgrace anyway.
 
I don't think Flynn has any particular meaning. He's just another talking head, and a notoriously stupid one at that. He doesn't represent the US military, which I'm sure is led by very pragmatic, reality-based people. They're not going to walk off a cliff on the orders of Trump.

He is their commander in chief. Is there any historical precedent of the military as a whole refusing to follow a presidental order?

He could, if he wished, dismiss any military official who refused to comply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom