Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
We all know Donald and Co and their give or take 200 million zealots will never ever concede. Which do you guys reckon Donald & them will go with:

The Insurrection Act

E. O. 13848

The States Legislatures

Electoral Count Act
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
So...you just dismiss the Wall St documents about the $400 million and who controls the software etc.?

How do you do that.....do you just bark 'hogwash' and carry on with your day.?
Click to expand...

One would think that with all this evidence, Trump would get a day in Court.
 
Bubba said:
How do you dismiss it without seeing it.?
Click to expand...

Well not seeing it makes it very easy to dismiss.

If you could summarize the important parts, and tell me what part of the video to look at, it might pique my interest enough to give it a click.

But without the summary of what I ought to be looking for it won't happen.
 
Bubba said:
We all know Donald and Co and their give or take 200 million zealots will never ever concede. Which do you guys reckon Donald & them will go with:

The Insurrection Act

E. O. 13848

The States Legislatures

Electoral Count Act
Click to expand...

200 million?
 
Meadmaker said:
Well not seeing it makes it very easy to dismiss.

If you could summarize the important parts, and tell me what part of the video to look at, it might pique my interest enough to give it a click.

But without the summary of what I ought to be looking for it won't happen.
Click to expand...

It's why I'm not a fan of argument by video. Few people are willing to sit for a long time to hear points that could be read in minutes as a summary. But then the person that offers the video can claim victory because the person won't watch it. A great way to score points instead of actually trying to persuade.
 
Last edited:
Meadmaker said:
If you could summarize the important parts, and tell me what part of the video to look at, it might pique my interest enough to give it a click.

But without the summary of what I ought to be looking for it won't happen.
Click to expand...


Gimme a break. Its self explanatory. You dont have 40 minutes?


Poll witnesses telling their stories of seeing fraud.
Ordinary smart people.

A democrat poll worker appalled at what he saw.
(like Spoonamore, a republican cyber security guy, blew the whistle on what he saw in 04 which was repubs stealing kerry's win) (but not in this video)

Cyber security experts agreeing no way are the machines safe. .

History of complaints and dire predictions (with proof) about the machines.

Not to mention common sense says WTF are we doing trusting elections to proprietary software.
 
Last edited:
gnome said:
It's why I'm not a fan of argument by video. Few people are willing to sit for a long time to hear points that could be read in minutes as a summary. But then the person that offers the video can claim victory because the person won't watch it. A great way to score points instead of actually trying to persuade.
Click to expand...


No way can I do justice to what is in certain videos, or articulate as well as the presenters.

I figure if anyone is actually interested, they will watch and listen
 
Aridas said:
You've heard the story about the boy who cried wolf, right?
Click to expand...


Its not about that.


Epic counterattack readied against "Cyber Pearl Harbor"


America was hit by a "Cyber Pearl Harbor" on Nov. 3rd, via the rigged Dominion voting machines that altered votes and tried to steal the election.

An epic counterattack is about to be launched to defend America, expose the fraud and save the republic.

Today's Situation Update provides extensive details on what's going down right now and what's next.

Read the full details and listen to the podcast here.

P.S. We are hearing rumblings of a major announcement by the White House coming as early as tonight. Watch NaturalNews and Brighteon for possible emergency updates depending on what happens. DNI Ratcliff's report on foreign interference is due this Friday, with huge implications.
Click to expand...


https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12...ttack-readied-against-cyber-pearl-harbor.html
 
Bubba said:
Gimme a break. Its self explanatory. You dont have 40 minutes?


Poll witnesses telling their stories of seeing fraud.
Ordinary smart people.

A democrat poll worker appalled at what he saw.
(like Spoonamore, a republican cyber security guy, blew the whistle on what he saw in 04 which was repubs stealing kerry's win) (but not in this video)

Cyber security experts agreeing no way are the machines safe. .

History of complaints and dire predictions (with proof) about the machines.

Not to mention common sense says WTF are we doing trusting elections to proprietary software.
Click to expand...

Sounds moronic. Without even looking, what I'm sure I would see is people saying they saw things they didn't understand. "I saw some guy running ballots through more than once", and that kind of drivel. Seen it all before. So have judges.

Every machine can be hacked. All of them. Dominion's have log trails that can catch a lot of hacking, but every one of them can be hacked. So can paper ballots. The question is whether they were actually hacked. There's no reason to believe it. Lots of people have very high incentives to catch it.

Fortunately, we don't actually trust elections to proprietary software. They produce paper ballots, and those serve to check anything that the software does. I think it's perfectly reasonable to add additional checks to the system, and, like slot machines, require source code on file, but the fact that we don't doesn't mean that there is fraud. It just means that there are additional ways that could make the systems even safer and more fraud-proof.

Previous "proof" that I have seen consisted of people demonstrating the audit features and how Dominion machines handle contested ballots. Those only proved that Dominion has features which allow people to handle contested ballots, although the video creators insist that those are ways to enter fraudulent votes. They are right, though. You could use those to enter fraudulent votes, as long as you have the cooperation of all of the relevant election officials, but if you have that sort of cooperation, any system, whether paper or electronic, could be hacked. It proves that every election back to 1796 might have been stolen.

I'll make a deal. Point me to a specific two minute segment and I'll tell you what's wrong with that specific two minute segment, and why it means nothing, unless of course I see those two minutes and there really is something suspicious, then I'll keep watching. I doubt that will happen, but it would be unfair to dismiss the possibility outright.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Poll witnesses telling their stories of seeing fraud.
Ordinary smart people.
Click to expand...

Fraud like all Chinese people looking the same? They saw some guy counting ballots? They didn't turn up to the orientation so didn't understand procedure?
 
Bubba said:
Good post


Anything but doing your own research is good
Click to expand...

Your premise is that we haven't already done our own research. You're wrong, at least for a lot of us.



Have we chased down every single video made concerning every allegation made? Of course not. If we did, some other video would be made and someone would say that since we didn't watch that one, we were too lazy to do our own research.

We've researched lots of claims. So have lots of other people. We researched the dead people voting in Georgia that Tucker Carlson talked about, and watched the interviews with the "dead people". We've read affidavits, and seen that they were nuts. We've listened to "expert witnesses" at a hotel in Gettysburg, and seen that what he said can't be true. There's no evidence of fraud.
 
Model of patriotitsm

Point me to a specific two minute segment
Click to expand...


Quibbling about taking a chance on learning the election was stolen is......


Quibbling about taking a chance on learning the election was stolen



40 minutes.?
 
Meadmaker said:
Your premise is that we haven't already done our own research. You're wrong, at least for a lot of us.



Have we chased down every single video made concerning every allegation made? Of course not. If we did, some other video would be made and someone would say that since we didn't watch that one, we were too lazy to do our own research.

We've researched lots of claims. So have lots of other people. We researched the dead people voting in Georgia that Tucker Carlson talked about, and watched the interviews with the "dead people". We've read affidavits, and seen that they were nuts. We've listened to "expert witnesses" at a hotel in Gettysburg, and seen that what he said can't be true. There's no evidence of fraud.
Click to expand...



Get a grip


The avalanche has barely begun.
 
Bubba said:
Quibbling about taking a chance on learning the election was stolen is......


Quibbling about taking a chance on learning the election was stolen



40 minutes.?
Click to expand...

You've got two. Take it or leave it. If it's worth watching more, I'll watch more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom